3种白纹伊蚊种群密度监测方法的效果比较研究

doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.03.004

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 336-339.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.03.004

3种白纹伊蚊种群密度监测方法的效果比较研究

马德珍¹, 宋伟¹, 徐燕¹, 刘焕燕²

1. 泰安市疾病预防控制中心消毒管理与病媒生物防制科, 山东泰安 271000;
2. 青岛大学附属泰安市中心医院口腔科, 山东泰安 271000

收稿日期:2022-01-13 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-11
通讯作者: 刘焕燕,E-mail:2307222877@qq.com
作者简介:马德珍,女,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事疾病控制方面研究,E-mail:madezhen1985@126.com
基金资助:
2016－2018年泰安市科技局计划项目（2016NS1204）

Comparison of three Aedes albopictus density monitoring methods

MA De-zhen¹, SONG Wei¹, XU Yan¹, LIU Huan-yan²

1. Department of Disinfection Management and Vector Control, Tai'an Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tai'an, Shandong 271000, China;
2. Department of Oral, Tai'an City Central Hospital Affilated to Qingdao University Tai'an, Shandong 271000, China

Received:2022-01-13 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-11
Supported by:
2016-2018 Tai'an Municipal Science and Technology Bureau Planned Project (No. 2016NS1204)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究比较3种方法在白纹伊蚊密度监测中的效果。方法在山东省泰安市选择城镇居民区、农村居民区、废品收购站和公园4类生境各1处作为监测点，采用布雷图指数（BI）法、诱蚊诱卵器（mosq-ovitrap，MOT）法、双层叠帐法3种方法，于2020年4－11月每月上、中、下旬各1次，开展白纹伊蚊密度监测。蚊虫密度间差异采用χ²检验，BI和诱蚊诱卵指数（MOI）间的相关性采用Pearson相关性分析。结果 2020年4－11月平均BI为1.57，平均MOI为6.22，双层叠帐法平均成蚊密度为0.05只/（顶·h）。3种监测方法的季节消长趋势基本一致，密度高峰均集中在8月上旬。MOT法在5月上旬开始监测到白纹伊蚊成蚊，BI法和双层叠帐法在7月上旬开始监测到白纹伊蚊。BI和MOI呈正相关（r=0.957，P<0.001），MOI和双层叠帐法成蚊密度呈正相关（r=0.914，P<0.001），BI和双层叠帐法成蚊密度呈正相关（r=0.934，P<0.001）。废品收购站BI（5.16）>农村居民区（3.10）>城镇居民区（0.11）>公园（0.00）。公园MOI（6.90）>城镇居民区（6.82）>农村居民区（5.55）>废品收购站（4.84）。双层叠帐法成蚊密度［只/（顶·h）］废品收购站（0.32）>农村居民区（0.30）>公园（0.22）>城镇居民区（0.06）。结论泰安地区MOT法监测的白纹伊蚊密度指数相对较高，更能较早反映白纹伊蚊密度水平，预警蚊传疾病风险。BI法和双层叠帐法在白纹伊蚊密度高峰期适用性较大。

关键词: 布雷图指数, 诱蚊诱卵指数, 双层叠帐法成蚊密度, 白纹伊蚊

Abstract: Objective To study the effects of three Aedes albopictus density monitoring methods. Methods One monitoring site each was selected in four types of habitats (urban residential areas, rural residential areas, waste collection stations, and parks) of Tai'an, Shandong province, China. The Breteau index (BI) method, Mosq-ovitrap (MOT) method, and double-layered mosquito net method were used to separately monitor the density of Ae. albopictus once each in the early, middle, and late periods of every month from April to November 2020. Differences in mosquito density were examined using Chi-squared test, and a Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between BI and mosq-ovitrap index (MOI). Results The average BI was 1.57, the average MOI was 6.22, and the average adult mosquitoes density by double-layer net method was 0.05 mosquito/net·h from April to November in 2020. The seasonal fluctuation trend of the three monitoring methods was basically the same, and the peak density was all in early August. Adult Ae. albopictus was detected by MOT method in early May, and Ae. albopictus was detected by BI method and double-layer net method in early July. There was a positive correlation between the BI and the MOI (r=0.957, P<0.001), and there was a positive correlation between the MOI and the adult mosquitoes density by double-layer (r=0.914, P<0.001), and there was a positive correlation between the BI and the adult mosquitoes density using double-layer net method (r=0.934, P<0.001). the BI in waste collection station (5.16)>in rural residential area (3.10)>in urban residential area (0.11)>in park (0.00). the MOI of park (6.90)>urban residential area (6.82)>rural residential area (5.55)>waste collection station (4.84). The adult mosquitoes density by double-layer net method in waste collection station (mosquito/net·h) (0.32)>rural residential area (0.30)>park (0.22)>urban residential area (0.06). Conclusion The density index of Ae. albopictus monitored by the MOT method is relatively high, which can reflect the density level of Ae. albopictus at an earlier time to provide an earlier warning of mosquito-borne diseases in Tai'an city. The BI method and double-layer net method are suitable for density surveillance during the peak period of Ae. albopictus.

Key words: Breteau index, Mosquito ovitrap index, Adult mosquito density by double-layered net method, Aedes albopictus

中图分类号:

R384.1

马德珍, 宋伟, 徐燕, 刘焕燕. 3种白纹伊蚊种群密度监测方法的效果比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(3): 336-339.

MA De-zhen, SONG Wei, XU Yan, LIU Huan-yan. Comparison of three Aedes albopictus density monitoring methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2022, 33(3): 336-339.

参考文献

[1] 刘起勇. 寨卡病毒媒介伊蚊控制策略和措施展望[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2016, 27(2):93-98. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.02.001. Liu QY. Prospects on Zika virus vector control measures and strategy[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2016, 27(2):93-98. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.02.001.(in Chinese)
[2] 景晓, 康殿民, 王学军. 蚊媒传染病监测技术及应用[M]. 济南:山东人民出版社, 2017:702-763. Jing X, Kang DM, Wang XJ. Monitoring technologies and their application of mosquito borne infectious diseases[M]. Ji'nan:Shandong People's Publishing House, 2017:702-763. (in Chinese)
[3] 李天奇, 刘钦梅, 吴瑜燕, 等. 浙江省登革热重点地区2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊种群密度监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1):21-24, 37. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280. 2022.01.004. Li TQ, Liu QM, Wu YY, et al. Surveillance of the population density of Aedes albopictus larvae in dengue prone and risk areas of Zhejiang province, China, 2020[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2022, 33(1):21-24, 37. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003. 8280.2022.01.004.(in Chinese)
[4] 田野, 吴治明, 张恒端, 等. 3种监测方法对白纹伊蚊成蚊密度监测效果比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(6):586-589. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.06.008. Tian Y, Wu ZM, Zhang HD, et al. Efficiency of three monitoring methods for the density of adult Aedes albopictus:A comparative analysis[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2018, 29(6):586-589. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.06.008.(in Chinese)
[5] 刘彬彬, 王家豪, 位广帅, 等. 诱蚊诱卵器与BGS-trap捕蚊器应用效果研究[J]. 河南大学学报(医学版), 2018, 37(4):254-256, 264. DOI:10.15991/j.cnki.41-1361/r.2018.04.007. Liu BB, Wang JH, Wei GS, et al. Study on the efficiency between ovitrap and BG-sentinel trap[J]. J Henan Univ:Med Sci, 2018, 37(4):254-256, 264. DOI:10.15991/j.cnki.41-1361/r.2018. 04.007.(in Chinese)
[6] Gao Q, Wang F, Lyu XH, et al. Comparison of the human-baited double net trap with the human landing catch for Aedes albopictus monitoring in Shanghai, China[J]. Parasit Vectors, 2018, 11(1):483. DOI:10.1186/s13071-018-3053-8.
[7] 郭玉红, 吴海霞, 刘小波, 等. 2018年全国媒介蚊虫监测报告[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(2):128-133. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.02.003. Guo YH, Wu HX, Liu XB, et al. National vectors surveillance report on mosquitoes in China, 2018[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2019, 30(2):128-133. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003. 8280.2019.02.003.(in Chinese)

[1]	马喆, 郑宇婷, 杨锐, 许翔, 魏春, 余晓君, 杨春梅, 姜进勇. 云南省普洱市思茅区2020年白纹伊蚊的密度、孳生习性及对杀虫剂抗性状况研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(3): 360-365.
[2]	伍思翰, 周欣欣, 柯雪梅, 李玉伟, 陈斌, 黄婧雯, 陈华芳, 林敏珍, 雷蕾, 郭志南, 孟凤霞. 福建省厦门市2020年白纹伊蚊对拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂敏感性及击倒抗性基因研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(2): 177-182.
[3]	刘文娟, 张可心, 程鹏, 张心雨, 张倩, 张忠, 张瑞玲. 白纹伊蚊性别差异miRNA筛选及miRNA-mRNA调控网络分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(2): 191-200.
[4]	覃晓宁, 任欣悦, 谢雪颜, 陈彦桦, 夏乾峰, 康迅. 海口市及周边地区白纹伊蚊幼蚊肠道微生物分离与鉴定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(2): 201-206.
[5]	范建华, 高阳, 朱进, 黄强, 李俊明, 苏梅惠, 张海林. 云南省西双版纳州2006-2020年登革热流行特征及媒介伊蚊监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(2): 245-251.
[6]	孙钦同, 韩英男, 刘言, 王学军, 刘峰, 赖世宏, 景晓. 山东省登革热媒介白纹伊蚊生态学调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 16-20.
[7]	李天奇, 刘钦梅, 吴瑜燕, 罗明宇, 王金娜, 龚震宇. 浙江省登革热重点地区2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊种群密度监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 21-24.
[8]	魏超, 马海芳, 廖宁, 熊绮梦. 广西壮族自治区2020－2021年登革热媒介伊蚊密度专项调查结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 25-29.
[9]	赵春春, 周欣欣, 李文玉, 伦辛畅, 刘小波, 吴海霞, 王君, 刘起勇, 孟凤霞. 2020年中国13省份登革热媒介白纹伊蚊抗药性监测及分析研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 30-37.
[10]	郑宇婷, 杨春梅, 杨明东, 姜进勇. 云南边境地区登革热媒介伊蚊生态学及抗药性监测[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 38-43.
[11]	涂涛田, 肖汉森, 孟凤霞, 刘起勇, 刘小波, 何亚明, 季恒青. 重庆市2019年登革热暴发疫情应急控制后媒介伊蚊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 44-47.
[12]	周欣欣, 李芬, 段文波, 马欣然, 宋秀平, 吴少英, 孟凤霞. 白纹伊蚊电压门控钠离子通道基因克隆及其生物信息学分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 672-679.
[13]	薛海滨, 孟金霞, 任乐, 景晓. 山东省临沂市2018－2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊监测与风险评估[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 686-690.
[14]	张育富, 张守刚, 朱丁, 顾灯安, 葛小伍, 袁建明, 崔倩, 褚宏亮. 江苏省多层住宅居民区不同楼层白纹伊蚊分布调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 700-704.
[15]	周毅彬, 朱奕奕, 朱伟, 姚隽一, 朱江, 冷培恩, 吴寰宇. 诱蚊诱卵器监测的空间抽样方法研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 749-755.

3种白纹伊蚊种群密度监测方法的效果比较研究

Comparison of three Aedes albopictus density monitoring methods

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价