中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 526-529.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.06.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

4类成蚊监测工具现场诱捕效果评价研究

陈传伟1, 刘起勇2, 魏世程2, 刘吉起3, 郭玉红2, 任东升2, 朱丽1, 刘祥1, 罗运动1, 沈阳1, 刘京利2, 李贵昌2, 刘小波2, 唐振强3   

  1. 1 永城市疾病预防控制中心, 河南 永城 476600;
    2 中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所, 传染病预防控制国家重点实验室, 世界卫生组织媒介生物监测与管理合作中心, 北京 102206;
    3 河南省疾病预防控制中心, 郑州 450016
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-23 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2017-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭玉红,Email:guoyuhong@icdc.cn
  • 作者简介:陈传伟,男,主治医师,从事疾病预防控制研究,Email:ccw138370@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    科技部改革发展专项(寨卡致病机制及其防控策略研究)

Comparative efficacy of four adult mosquito surveillance tools in Yongcheng city

CHEN Chuan-wei1, LIU Qi-yong2, WEI Shi-cheng2, LIU Ji-qi3, GUO Yu-hong2, REN Dong-sheng2, ZHU Li1, LIU Xiang1, LUO Yun-dong1, SHEN Yang1, LIU Jing-li2, LI Gui-chang2, LIU Xiao-bo2, TANG Zhen-qiang3   

  1. 1 Yongcheng Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yongcheng 476600, Henan Province, China;
    2 State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO Collaborating Centre for Vector Surveillance and Management;
    3 Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Received:2017-06-23 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2017-12-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Zika Special Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology Reform and Development Project

摘要: 目的 比较4类成蚊监测工具的现场诱捕效果。方法 2016年8月13-20日选择河南省永城市高庄镇谢庄村,在蚊虫活动高发季节于羊圈生境中,采用4种监测工具连续开展现场成蚊诱捕试验,对白天(09:00-18:00)和夜晚(18:00至次日09:00)捕获蚊虫分别进行分拣、分类统计,依次轮换监测工具位置,共进行2轮,比较捕获成蚊效果。结果 4类监测工具白天时段的蚊虫监测结果不具有统计分析意义;4类监测工具在夜间均捕获鳞翅目蛾类昆虫,以功夫小帅诱蚊灯捕获蛾类昆虫密度最高,为24.43只(灯/·夜);功夫小帅诱蚊灯、迈斯萃/加康升级版捕蚊器和WJ-C全自动蚊虫采样器捕获蚊虫均以三带喙库蚊雌蚊密度最高,分别为797.29、62.57和85.17只(灯/·夜);BGS-trap捕蚊器捕获蚊虫则以淡色库蚊雌蚊密度最高,为22.71只(灯/·夜)。结论 各类监测工具夜晚均能捕获居民区的主要蚊种,均具有噪音昆虫诱捕干扰,功夫小帅诱蚊灯干扰昆虫数量最多,在捕获三带喙库蚊和中华按蚊数量上具有优势;BGS-trap捕蚊器和WJ-C全自动蚊虫采样器捕获蚊虫数量较少;迈斯萃/加康升级版捕蚊器在蚊虫监测工作中具有优势;监测工具的选择和替换仍需进一步验证。

关键词: 媒介成蚊, 监测工具, 效果评价

Abstract: Objective To compare the effectiveness of 4 adult mosquito sampling methods. Methods All the experiments were carried out in sheepfolds during mosquito active season around-the-clock continuously for 2 circles rotating positions one by one in Yongcheng city, Henan province. The mosquitoes were collected and sorted separately in the daytime (09:00-18:00) and nighttime (18:00-09:00 the next day). Results The results in the daytime did not give us any specific indication except all the tools did not work well as surveillance tools during daytime. All the monitoring tools caught the main mosquito species in the residential areas at nighttime, but all of them had the unexpected other insects especially the most in Kung Fu Xiao Shuai. Kung Fu Xiao Shuai showed excellent results in trapping Culex tritaeniorhynchus and Anopheles sinensis; BGS-trap and WJ-C captured a small number of mosquitoes; Maisicui caught a variety of mosquito species with the appreciable density for surveillance work. Conclusion Kung Fu Xiao Shuai might be a good surveillance tool for Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and An. sinensis; Maisicui could work as a good mosquito surveillance tool in general; this study can be used to evaluate the mosquito monitoring tools partially and the selection and replacement of monitoring tools need further efficacy evaluation.

Key words: Adult mosquito, Surveillance tool, Efficacy evaluation

中图分类号: