中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 154-157.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.02.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2005-2017年广东和云南省登革热高发区本地登革热流行病学特征比较研究

刘可可1, 刘小波1, 孙继民2, 宋秀平1, 吴海霞1, 王君1, 闫冬明1, 刘起勇1   

  1. 1. 中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所媒介生物控制室, 传染病预防控制国家重点实验室, 传染病诊治协同创新中心, 北京 102206;
    2. 浙江省疾病预防控制中心, 杭州 310051
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-24 出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘起勇,Email:liuqiyong@icdc.cn
  • 作者简介:刘可可,女,在读博士,主要从事登革热影响因素和预测方面的研究,Email:kekegood66@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1200802);传染病预防控制国家重点实验室自主研究重点课题(2018SKLID101);国家自然科学基金(81703280)

Epidemiological characteristics of indigenous in the high-risk areas of Guangdong and Yunnan provinces, China, from 2005 to 2017:a comparative study

LIU Ke-ke1, LIU Xiao-bo1, SUN Ji-min2, SONG Xiu-ping1, WU Hai-xia1, WANG Jun1, YAN Dong-ming1, LIU Qi-yong1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;
    2. Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Received:2018-12-24 Online:2019-04-20 Published:2019-04-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC1200802), Key Project of SKLID (No. 2018 SKLID101) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81703280)

摘要: 目的 比较广东和云南省登革热高发区的本地登革热病例流行病学特征。方法 收集2005-2017年的登革热病例信息,包括病例所在的现地址、性别、年龄、职业、发病时间、确诊时间和病例是否为输入病例等信息,采用SPSS 20.0和R 3.5.0软件进行统计学分析。结果 从2005-2017年广东省研究的高发区域发生登革热本地病例共有44 676例,云南省高发区域发生登革热本地病例共有3 676例。2个研究区域登革热本地病例的职业、年龄、性别及发病和确诊时间间隔差异均有统计学意义(χ2=989.647、98.666、7.429,P=0.000、0.000、0.006;U=5.360,P=0.000),其中广东省高发区登革热本地病例主要为家务及待业者,云南省主要为商业服务者;广东省高发区域登革热病例在各个年龄段广泛分布,云南省主要集中于青壮年;在性别分布中,广东省高发区域登革热的男性比例低于云南省。结论 广东和云南省登革热本地病例整体均呈现上升趋势,两地的登革热本地病例流行病学特征存在明显差异。

关键词: 登革热, 本地病例, 广东省, 云南省, 流行病学

Abstract: Objective To compare the epidemiological characteristics of indigenous dengue cases in the high-risk areas of Guangdong and Yunnan provinces, China. Methods The data of dengue cases from 2005 to 2017 were collected, which included the present address, sex, age, occupation, time of onset, time of diagnosis, and whether the cases were imported or not. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 and R 3.5.0. Results From 2005 to 2017, there were 44 676 and 3 676 indigenous dengue cases in the high-risk areas of Guangdong and Yunnan provinces, respectively. The two study regions were significantly different in the occupation, age, sex, and interval from onset to diagnosis for indigenous dengue cases (χ2=989.647, P=0.000; χ2=98.666, P=0.000; χ2=7.429, P=0.006; U=5.360, P=0.000). Besides, the indigenous dengue cases were mainly household and unemployed workers in the high-risk areas of Guangdong province and commercial service workers in Yunnan province. The indigenous dengue cases were widely distributed in all ages in the high-risk areas of Guangdong province, but concentrated in young adults in Yunnan province. The male proportion of dengue cases in the high-risk areas of Guangdong province was lower than that in Yunnan province. Conclusion The numbers of indigenous dengue cases in Guangdong and Yunnan provinces rose from 2005 to 2017, and there was a significant difference in their epidemiological characteristics between the two provinces.

Key words: Dengue fever, Indigenous cases, Guangdong province, Yunnan province, Epidemiological

中图分类号: