调查研究

山东省烟台市长角血蜱携带嗜吞噬细胞无形体调查研究

展开
  • 1. 滨州医学院公共卫生与管理学院, 山东 烟台 264000;
    2. 烟台市疾病预防控制中心消毒与病媒生物防制科, 山东 烟台 264003;
    3. 山东省疾病预防控制中心消毒与病媒生物防制所, 山东 济南 250013
赵颖珠,女,在读硕士,主要从事传染病媒介生物研究,E-mail:zhaoyingzhu2021@163.com;李春辉,女,副主任医师,主要从事消毒与病媒生物防治研究工作,E-mail:lichunhui2015@163.com

收稿日期: 2024-11-24

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-18

基金资助

山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(202112070223);烟台市医疗卫生重点学科项目(2020)

An investigation of Anaplasma phagocytophilum carried by Haemaphysalis longicornis in Yantai, Shandong Province, China

Expand
  • 1. School of Public Health and Management, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong 264000, China;
    2. Department of Disinfection and Vector Control and Prevention, Yantai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yantai, Shandong 264003, China;
    3. Institute of Disinfection and Vector Control and Prevention, Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, Shandong 250013, China

Received date: 2024-11-24

  Online published: 2024-10-18

Supported by

General Projects of Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Plan of Shandong (No. 202112070223); Yantai Medical and Health Key Discipline Project (2020)

摘要

目的 了解山东省烟台市长角血蜱携带嗜吞噬细胞无形体的情况,为烟台市防控人粒细胞无形体病、降低蜱危害提供相关科学依据。方法 于2021年4—10月在烟台市牟平区、开发区、蓬莱区、海阳市、栖霞市、招远市、莱州市等地开展蜱监测,采用体表检蜱法和布旗法分别采集家畜体表的寄生蜱和野外环境中的游离蜱。采用巢式PCR法对采集的长角血蜱进行嗜吞噬细胞无形体检测,SPSS 22.0软件对不同组间阳性率进行χ2检验。结果 共捕获1 698只蜱,均为长角血蜱,其中寄生蜱1 097只,游离蜱601只。将采集的913只寄生蜱与游离蜱按不同地区、不同来源和发育阶段及有无吸血进行分组,提取DNA,获得413份样本,共检出13份嗜吞噬细胞无形体核酸阳性样本,阳性检出率为3.15%,最小感染率1.42%;其中寄生蜱检测出11份阳性样本,包括2份犬源蜱样本和9份羊源蜱样本;游离蜱检测出2份阳性样本。寄生蜱阳性样本均为成蜱,游离蜱阳性样本中,1份为幼蜱,1份为成蜱;不同来源蜱样本阳性率的差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.722,P=0.423)。开发区、莱州市寄生蜱中分别检出3份和6份阳性样本,蓬莱区游离蜱中检出1份阳性样本,招远市则在2份寄生蜱和1份游离蜱样本中检出阳性,不同市(区)之间蜱样本阳性率的差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.468,P=0.038)。结论 长角血蜱作为烟台市的优势蜱种,且多个市(区)不同来源的长角血蜱存在嗜吞噬细胞无形体感染,潜在致病风险较高,应加强蜱生态学监测及相关病原体检测,为人粒细胞无形体病防控提供科学依据。

本文引用格式

赵颖珠, 李春辉, 刘成娟, 王婷, 张慧敏, 肖龙杰, 王学军, 郭培军 . 山东省烟台市长角血蜱携带嗜吞噬细胞无形体调查研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024 , 35(5) : 587 -592 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2024.05.014

Abstract

Objective To investigate the prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Haemaphysalis longicornis in Yantai, Shandong Province, China, so as to provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of human granulocytic anaplasmosis and the dangers of ticks in Yantai. Methods Tick surveillance was carried out in Muping District, Yantai economic and technological development zone (development zone), Penglai District, Haiyang City, Qixia City, Zhaoyuan City, and Laizhou City of Yantai from April to October in 2021. On-host ticks were collected from domestic animals through body surface inspection and questing ticks in the field environment were collected using the flagging method. Nested PCR was used to detect A. phagocytophilum in H. longicornis specimens. SPSS 22.0 software was used to perform the Chi-square test to compare the positive rates of different groups. Results A total of 1 698 ticks (1 097 on-host ticks and 601 questing ticks) were captured, all belonging to H. longicornis. DNA was extracted from 913 ticks grouped by region, source, developmental stage, and whether they were engorged. Among the obtained 413 DNA samples, 13 were positive for the nucleic acid of A. phagocytophilum, with a positive rate of 3.15% and a minimum infection rate of 1.42%; and of the 13 positive samples, 11 were from adult on-host ticks (2 from dogs and 9 from sheep), and the other 2 were from questing ticks (1 from larvae and 1 from adults). There was no significant difference in the positive rates of ticks from different hosts (χ2=1.722, P=0.423). By region, 3 and 6 positive samples were detected in the on-host ticks in the development zone and Laizhou City, 1 positive sample was detected in the free ticks in Penglai District, and 3 positive samples (2 from on-host ticks and 1 from free ticks) were detected in Zhaoyuan City. There was a significant difference in the positive rates of ticks from different regions (χ2=11.468, P=0.038). Conclusions H. longicornis, the dominant tick species in Yantai, from different host sources in various districts/cities have an infection with A. phagocytophilum, indicating a high pathogenic risk from human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Tick surveillance and pathogen detection should be strengthened to inform the prevention and control of human granulocytic anaplasmosis.

参考文献

[1] Liu HB. Isolation and identification of tick pathogens and surveillance study[D]. Beijing:Academy of Military Sciences,2018. (in Chinese) 刘洪波. 蜱感染病原体的分离鉴定与监测研究[D]. 北京:军事科学院,2018.
[2] Li LH,Zhang Y. Epidemic status and control of tick-borne parasitic diseases in China[J]. Chin J Schisto Control,2019,31(1):58-62. DOI:10.16250/j.32.1374.2018310.(in Chinese) 李兰花,张仪. 我国蜱传寄生虫病流行现状及防控[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志,2019,31(1):58-62. DOI:10.16250/j.32.1374.2018310.
[3] Madison-Antenucci S,Kramer LD,Gebhardt LL,et al. Emerging tick-borne diseases[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev,2020,33(2):e00083-18. DOI:10.1128/CMR.00083-18.
[4] Nader J,Król N,Pfeffer M,et al. The diversity of tick-borne bacteria and parasites in ticks collected from the Strandja Nature Park in south-eastern Bulgaria[J]. Parasit Vectors,2018,11(1):165. DOI:10.1186/s13071-018-2721-z.
[5] Zhou MH,Chen HN. A review on emerging tick-borne pathogens in China[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2019,25(3):193-198. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2019.03.001.(in Chinese) 周明浩,陈红娜. 我国新发蜱媒病原体研究概述[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2019,25(3):193-198. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2019.03.001.
[6] Tao LY,Liang Z,Bao FK,et al. Progress in study of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in China[J]. China Trop Med,2017,17(2):193-197. DOI:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2017.02.23.(in Chinese) 陶律延,梁张,宝福凯,等. 中国人粒细胞无形体病的研究进展[J]. 中国热带医学,2017,17(2):193-197. DOI:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2017.02.23.
[7] Xu XH,Yin HY,Zhang NJ,et al. Investigation on a human granulocytic anaplasmosis disease in Laizhou City[J]. Prev Med Trib,2011,17(4):357-358. DOI:10.16406/j.pmt.issn.1672-9153.2011.04.029.(in Chinese) 徐雪华,尹海英,张乃杰,等. 莱州市1例人粒细胞无形体病病例调查[J]. 预防医学论坛,2011,17(4):357-358. DOI:10.16406/j.pmt.issn.1672-9153.2011.04.029.
[8] Wang T,Bian C,Liu HY,et al. Suspected human granulocytic anaplasmosis:An analysis of 12 cases[J]. Med J Qilu,2011,26(3):257-258,260. (in Chinese) 王婷,边城,刘涵云,等. 疑似人粒细胞无形体病12例分析[J]. 齐鲁医学杂志,2011,26(3):257-258,260.
[9] Wang S,Kou ZQ,Wang M,et al. A survey and identification of co-infection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichiachaffeensis in Shandong[J]. Dis Surveill,2012,27(8):642-643. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2012.8.018.(in Chinese) 王爽,寇增强,王梅,等. 一起人粒细胞无形体和查菲埃立克体符合感染病例的确认和调查[J]. 疾病监测,2012,27(8):642-643. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2012.8.018.
[10] Sun M,Nie Y,Wang SF,et al. Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in cattle,sheep and ticks in Hexi area,Gansu Province[J]. Chin J Anim Infect Dis,2022,30(2):164-169. DOI:10.19958/j.cnki.cn31-2031/s.2022.02.012.(in Chinese) 孙明,聂英,王淑芳,等. 河西走廊区域牛、羊和蜱的嗜吞噬细胞无形体分子检测[J]. 中国动物传染病学报,2022,30(2):164-169. DOI:10.19958/j.cnki.cn31-2031/s.2022.02.012.
[11] Hornok S,Boldogh SA,Takács N,et al. Zoonotic ecotype -Ⅰ ofAnaplasma phagocytophilum in sympatric wildcat,pine marten and red squirrel-short communication[J]. Acta Vet Hung,2022,70(3):215-219. DOI:10.1556/004.2022.00021.
[12] Zhou SH,Zeng ZW,Liu WJ,et al. Investigation and genotype analysis of piroplasms in ticks parasitized on wild animals in eastern Fujian[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis,2022,40(1):76-83. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2022.01.011.(in Chinese) 周淑姮,曾志伟,刘维俊,等. 闽东地区野生动物寄生蜱感染梨形虫状况的调查及基因型分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2022,40(1):76-83. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2022.01.011.
[13] Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. National vector surveillance implementation plan[Z]. Beijing:Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,2016. (in Chinese) 中国疾病预防控制中心. 全国病媒生物监测实施方案[Z]. 北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2016.
[14] Lu BL,Wu HY. Classification and identification of important medical insects of China[M]. Zhengzhou:Henan Science and Technology Press,2003:652-713. (in Chinese) 陆宝麟,吴厚永. 中国重要医学昆虫分类与鉴别[M]. 郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2003:652-713.
[15] Zhao QL,Huang L,Yang X,et al. 16S rRNA sequence analysis of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in rodents from parts area of Xinjiang[J]. Chin J Zoonoses,2013,29(8):743-747. DOI:10.3969/cjz.jissn1002-2694.2013.08.002.(in Chinese) 赵庆亮,黄林,杨霞,等. 新疆部分地区鼠类无形体和埃立克体的调查及16S rRNA序列分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,2013,29(8):743-747. DOI:10.3969/cjz.jissn1002-2694.2013.08.002.
[16] Cui XM. Anaplasma phagocytophilum and its coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens:Experimental study and epidemiological investigation[D]. Beijing:Academy of Military Medical Sciences,2016. (in Chinese) 崔晓鸣. 嗜吞噬细胞无形体及其复合感染的调查与实验研究[D]. 北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2016.
[17] Chen SH,Zhang QY,Yuan J,et al. Pathogenic mechanisms of Anaplasma phagocytophilum[J]. Chin J Microbiol Immunol,2021,41(12):962-968. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112309-20210616-00205.(in Chinese) 陈施华,张秋宇,袁瑾,等. 嗜吞噬细胞无形体致病机制的研究现状[J]. 中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2021,41(12):962-968. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112309-20210616-00205.
[18] Liu ZJ,Zheng L,Zhang AQ,et al. Research progress of clinical epidemiology,prevention and treatment on human granulocytic anaplasmosis. [J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2018,24(5):417-422. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2018.05.001.(in Chinese) 刘增加,郑龙,张爱勤,等. 人粒细胞无形体病临床流行病学与防治研究现状[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(5):417-422. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2018.05.001.
[19] Zhang Y,Feng P,Zhai JJ. Progress on interactions of ticks and pathogens[J]. Chin J Anim Infect Dis,2020,28(5):86-93. DOI:10.19958/j.cnki.cn31-2031/s.2020.05.015.(in Chinese) 张艳,冯平,翟军军. 蜱与病原体相互作用的研究进展[J]. 中国动物传染病学报,2020,28(5):86-93. DOI:10.19958/j.cnki.cn31-2031/s.2020.05.015.
[20] Zou YX,Jin HT,Wang QY,et al. Molecular detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ixodid ticks in Hebei Province,China[J]. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis,2011,11(10):1323-1327. DOI:10.1089/vbz.2010.0253.
[21] Zhang LJ,Wang GQ,Liu QH,et al. Molecular analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum isolated from patients with febrile diseases of unknown etiology in China[J]. PLoS ONE,2013,8(2):e57155. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0057155.
[22] Zhang LY,Li J,Zhan FX,et al. Investigation on the Haemaphysalis longicornis infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Hubei Province,China[J]. Chin J Zoonoses,2010,26(12):1148-1150. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2010.12.017.(in Chinese) 张令要,李静,詹发先,等. 湖北省长角血蜱携带嗜吞噬细胞无形体的调查[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,2010,26(12):1148-1150. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2010.12.017.
[23] Zhou Q,He Z,Shao ZJ. Epidemiological characteristics and progress in clinical diagnosis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2022,28(2):184-187. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2022.02.022.(in Chinese) 周琦,贺真,邵中军. 嗜吞噬细胞无形体的流行特征及临床诊断进展[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2022,28(2):184-187. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2022.02.022.
[24] Grochowska A,Milewski R,Pancewicz S,et al. Comparison of tick-borne pathogen prevalence in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in urban areas of Europe[J]. Sci Rep,2020,10(1):6975. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-63883-y.
[25] Aardema ML,Bates NV,Archer QE,et al. Demographic expansions and the emergence of host specialization in genetically distinct ecotypes of the tick-transmitted bacterium Anaplasma phagocytophilum[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2022,88(14):e00617-22. DOI:10.1128/aem.00617-22.
[26] Yu Q,Liu QH,Ju ZB,et al. Genetic identification of A. Phagocytophilum from H. longicornisin Laizhou bay of Shandong Province,China[J]. Chin J Zoonoses,2012,28(4):323-326. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2012.04.003.(in Chinese) 于强,刘庆辉,鞠中斌,等. 山东莱洲湾湿地长角血蜱无形体16S rRNA检测分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,2012,28(4):323-326. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2012.04.003.
[27] Salter SJ,Cox MJ,Turek EM,et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses[J]. BMC Biol,2014,12:87. DOI:10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z.
文章导航

/