实验研究

上海市东部沿海地区大型建筑工地灭鼠毒饵适口性研究

展开
  • 1. 上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心病媒生物控制与寄生虫病防制科, 上海 200136;
    2. 复旦大学浦东预防医学研究院, 上海 200136
冯磊,男,主管医师,主要从事病媒生物防制研究工作,E-mail:fenglei_03@sina.com

收稿日期: 2023-12-11

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-18

基金资助

上海市浦东新区卫生系统学科带头人培养计划(PWRd2023-12);上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心卫生科技项目(PDCDC-2022-07);上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2023-2025年)重点学科(GWVI-11.1-02);上海市浦东新区卫生健康委公共卫生高峰学科-传染病学(PWYggf2021-01)

Palatability of different rodenticide baits at large construction sites in the eastern coastal area of Shanghai, China

Expand
  • 1. Department of Vector Control and Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Pudong New Area Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200136, China;
    2. Fudan University Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai 200136, China

Received date: 2023-12-11

  Online published: 2024-10-18

Supported by

Health System Discipline Leader Training Plan of Shanghai Pudong New Area (No. PWRd2023-12); Health Technology Project of Shanghai Pudong New Area Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No. PDCDC-2022-07); Shanghai's Three-year Action Plan for Strengthening the Construction of the Public Health System (2023-2025) Key Disciplines (No. GWVI-11.1-02);Public Health Highland Subject of Pudong Health Commission of Shanghai (No. PWYggf2021-01)

摘要

目的 筛选适口性好的灭鼠毒饵,为大规模灭鼠活动减少灭鼠时间和提高灭鼠质量提供支持。方法 将含0.005%溴鼠灵的蜡块、稻谷毒饵、玉米毒饵、小麦毒饵、花生毒饵与1种基饵(自然晒干的花生米)按照1∶1两两配对,饱和式投放,连续7 d观察和记录摄食情况,采用方差分析和两变量相关性分析对数据进行统计分析。结果 花生毒饵7 d累计摄食系数(FC)为0.57,适口性好;稻谷毒饵为0.18,溴鼠灵蜡块为0.18,玉米毒饵为0.17,适口性均为中等;小麦毒饵为0.10,适口性差。稻田(F=25.340,P<0.001)、居民区(F=5.667,P=0.002)和树林生境(F=3.190,P=0.022)中各毒饵7 d累计FC差异均有统计学意义,均是花生毒饵的最高,分别为0.69、0.54、0.49,居民区中玉米毒饵的7 d累计FC为0.41,适口性均好。结论 上海市东部沿海地区建筑工地开工前,可采用含溴鼠灵的花生毒饵开展大范围灭鼠工作,可提高灭鼠的效率。

本文引用格式

冯磊, 陆丽华, 元永艇, 于思雨, 刘汉昭 . 上海市东部沿海地区大型建筑工地灭鼠毒饵适口性研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024 , 35(5) : 513 -516 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2024.05.001

Abstract

Objective To select palatable rodenticide baits, so as to provide support for reducing time invested and improving rodent control quality in large-scale rodent control activities. Methods Wax block baits, rice baits, corn baits, wheat baits, and peanut baits containing 0.005% brodifacoum were each paired up with a type of bait base (naturally dried peanuts) in a 1∶1 ratio. The baits were placed in a saturated manner. Bait consumption was monitored and recorded consecutively for seven consecutive days. Analysis of variance and bivariate correlation analysis were performed. Results The 7-day cumulative feeding coefficient (FC) was 0.57 for the peanut baits, indicating good palatability; 0.18 for the rice baits, 0.18 for the wax blocks, and 0.17 for the corn baits, indicating moderate palatability; and 0.10 for the wheat baits, indicating poor palatability. There were significant differences in the 7-day cumulative FC of different baits in paddy field (F=25.340, P<0.001), residential area (F=5.667, P=0.002) and forest habitat (F=3.190, P=0.022), and the 7-day cumulative FC of peanut bait was the highest in the three habitats, which was 0.69, 0.54 and 0.49, respectively. The corn baits also showed good palatability in residential areas with a 7-day cumulative FC of 0.41. Conclusion Before starting construction at construction sites in the eastern coastal area of Shanghai, China, peanut baits containing brodifacoum can be used for large-scale rodent control work, which can improve the efficiency of rodent control.

参考文献

[1] Liu YY,Cao JZ,Geng HS,et al. The influence of the Beijing Capital International Airport T3 terminal construction on circumjacent rodent composition and density[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2009,20(3):258-259. (in Chinese) 刘永有,曹建中,耿洪善,等. 首都机场T3航站楼建设工程对其周边鼠种构成及鼠密度影响的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2009,20(3):258-259.
[2] Zhou DJ,Chen Y,Li JH. Investigation on the infection rate of hemorrhage fever with renal syndrome virus in rodents at construction sites in the urban areas of Wuhan[J]. Chin J Public Health,1995,11(10):474. (in Chinese) 周敦金,陈勇,李久鹤. 武汉市城区建筑工地鼠类肾综合征出血热带毒率调查[J]. 中国公共卫生,1995,11(10):474.
[3] Wang QY,Wang SH,Dong TF,et al. Investigation on rodents before and after the assault rodent control in Jiading District of Shanghai[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2021,27(2):145-147. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2021.02.015.(in Chinese) 王巧燕,王韶华,董腾飞,等. 上海市嘉定区突击灭鼠前后鼠情调查[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2021,27(2):145-147. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2021.02.015.
[4] Chen WE,Li XY,Zhong LQ,et al. The palatability and field deratization effect of 0.005% brodifacoum baits[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2016,22(3):239-241. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2016.03.009.(in Chinese) 陈蔚恩,李选云,钟柳青,等. 0.005%溴鼠灵饵剂的适口性及其现场灭鼠效果研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2016,22(3):239-241. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2016.03.009.
[5] Zhu YC. Analysis on the control effect of epidemic hemorrhagic fever in Nanhui County[J]. Prev Med Trib,1996,2(4):310-311. DOI:10.16406/j.pmt.issn.1672-9153.1996.04.008.(in Chinese) 朱友才. 南汇县流行性出血热防病效果分析[J]. 预防医学文献信息,1996,2(4):310-311. DOI:10.16406/j.pmt.issn.1672-9153.1996.04.008.
[6] Xu HM. An epidemiological analysis of epidemic hemorrhagic fever (EHF) in Nanhui District of Shanghai[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev,2003,7(6):569-570. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3679.2003.06.035.(in Chinese) 徐红梅. 上海市南汇县流行性出血热流行病学分析[J]. 疾病控制杂志,2003,7(6):569-570. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3679.2003.06.035.
[7] Lu NH,Jia DS,Tan WL,et al. Analysis on the effect of ecological control of rodent harm[J]. Chin J Public Health,2002,18(6):731. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2002.06.043.(in Chinese) 陆年宏,贾德胜,谭伟龙,等. 生态防制控制鼠害效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生,2002,18(6):731. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2002.06.043.
[8] Deng LL,He JH,Liao J,et al. Comparative the deratization effect of two anticoagulant rodenticide dosage forms in laboratories and scene[J]. J Med Pest Control,2010,26(12):1108-1109. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6245.2010.12.011.(in Chinese) 邓良利,何建韩,廖骏,等. 抗凝血灭鼠剂两种剂型的实验室及现场灭鼠效果比较[J]. 医学动物防制,2010,26(12):1108-1109. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6245.2010.12.011.
[9] Wang P,Zhao LX,Zheng BF. Comparison of field deratization effects of two anticoagulant rodenticides[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2009,15(1):26-28. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2009.01.012.(in Chinese) 王平,赵丽仙,郑本锋. 2种抗凝血灭鼠剂现场灭鼠效果比较研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2009,15(1):26-28. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2009.01.012.
[10] Li CN. Report on the palatability test of rodents to different base bait and poison bait in Qinhuangdao Port Area[J]. J Med Pest Control,1996,12(4):12-14. (in Chinese) 李昌年. 秦皇岛港区鼠对不同饵料及毒饵适口性试验报告[J]. 医学动物防制,1996,12(4):12-14.
[11] Liu J,Xu Y,Yu XL,et al. Surveillance and control of rodents in Neijiang City[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2016,22(3):266-267,270. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2016.03.018.(in Chinese) 刘鹃,徐勇,于雪岚,等. 内江市鼠类种群监测及控制研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2016,22(3):266-267,270. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2016.03.018.
[12] Song ML,Yang J,Qu JL,et al. Evaluation on the palatability and killig efficacy of brodifacoum wax-mass against mouse[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2002,8(3):29-31. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2002.03.011.(in Chinese) 宋明亮,杨军,曲建立,等. 溴鼠灵蜡块对家鼠适口性和灭效的实验评价[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2002,8(3):29-31. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2002.03.011.
[13] Zeng GQ,Zeng GS,Xu JY. Test and observation on the palatability of rodents to grain bait[C]//Zhejiang Province Pest Control Scientific Association. Compilation of outstanding academic papers of Zhejiang Province Pest Control Scientific Association (2015). Wenzhou: Zhejiang Province Pest Control Scientific Association,2015:38-39. (in Chinese) 曾国强,曾国胜,许金燕. 鼠类对谷物饵料适口性的测试观察[C]//浙江省除四害科技协会.浙江省除四害科技协会优秀学术论文评选汇编(2015年度). 温州:浙江省科学技术协会,2015:38-39.
[14] Jia DS,Tian SL,Lu NH,et al. The field trial of screening on the combination of attractants of rodenticide baits by factorial experiment[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2001,12(4):243-245. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2001.04.002.(in Chinese) 贾德胜,田树林,陆年宏,等. 析因设计在灭鼠毒饵诱饵组合筛选中的应用[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2001,12(4):243-245. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2001.04.002.
文章导航

/