调查研究

2017-2022年中山口岸输入性病媒生物截获情况分析

展开
  • 1. 广东药科大学公共卫生学院, 广东 广州 510006;
    2. 中山海关技术中心国家医学媒介生物监测重点实验室, 广东 中山 528403;
    3. 珠海国际旅行卫生保健中心(拱北海关口岸门诊部), 广东 珠海 519020;
    4. 秦皇岛海关, 河北 秦皇岛 066002;
    5. 中山火炬职业技术学院, 广东 中山 528436;
    6. 广东药科大学食品科学学院食品科学系, 广东 中山 528458
赖梅凤,女,在读硕士,从事公共卫生研究,E-mail:1751543772@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-08-14

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-05

基金资助

海关总署项目(2020HK121,2021HK144);中山市社会公益与基础研究项目(2021B2009,2023B2021);拱北海关科研项目(2021GK009,2023GK002,2023GK004);河北省重点研发计划(213777109D)

An analysis of intercepted vectors at Zhongshan Port, China, 2017-2022

Expand
  • 1. School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Medical Vector Surveillance, Zhongshan Customs Technology Center, Zhongshan, Guangdong 528403, China;
    3. Zhuhai International Travel Healthcare Center(Gongbei Customs Port Out-patient Department), Zhuhai, Guangdong 519020, China;
    4. Qinhuangdao Customs, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066002, China;
    5. Zhongshan Torch Polytechnic, Zhongshan, Guangdong 528436, China;
    6. Department of Food Science, School of Food Science, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Zhongshan, Guangdong 528458, China

Received date: 2023-08-14

  Online published: 2024-03-05

Supported by

General Administraion of Customs Research Projects (No. 2020HK121, 2021HK144); Zhongshan City Major Public Welfare Projects (No. 2021B2009, 2023B2021); Gongbei Customs Research Projects (No. 2021GK009, 2023GK002, 2023GK004); Key R&D Program in Hebei Province (No. 213777109D)

摘要

目的 分析中山口岸2017-2022年输入性病媒生物监测数据,总结中山口岸病媒生物输入规律,为口岸制定病媒生物监测策略、预防传染性疾病的传播提供参考依据。方法 根据2017-2022年中山口岸入境货物截获病媒生物情况,采用描述性统计方法对病媒生物的种属构成比、数量变化、来源地及与携带途径的关联性进行分析。结果 2017-2022年中山口岸截获的病媒生物有蜚蠊、蝇、蚊、鼠形动物及蠓共5大类51种。其中,截获的蜚蠊类中,美洲大蠊、澳洲大蠊、古巴绿蠊和德国小蠊分别占蜚蠊总数的36.48%、28.36%、17.64%和13.37%;蛆症异蚤蝇、家蝇、市蝇和红头丽蝇分别占蝇类总数的26.14%、25.00%、12.50%和11.36%;致倦库蚊、东乡伊蚊和白纹伊蚊分别占蚊类总数的85.11%、7.98%和3.72%;主要的鼠形动物是黄胸鼠;主要蠓类为异域库蠓。蜚蠊的主要来源地是圭亚那,蝇类和蚊类主要来源于中国香港。口岸病媒生物主要通过木材原料、集装箱和入境维修船舶等途径入境;木材中携带的病媒生物种类较多,最多的是蜚蠊,占48.41%。结论 中山口岸截获病媒生物种类繁多,来源广泛,其中有6种为全国口岸首次截获的国内未见分布种,外来病媒生物入侵风险和由此带来的公共卫生潜在风险较高,进一步加强口岸病媒生物检疫鉴定、监测和防控意义重大。

本文引用格式

赖梅凤, 陈健, 李婷婷, 刘德星, 魏晓雅, 聂维忠, 岳巧云, 石筱毓, 邱德义, 毕水莲 . 2017-2022年中山口岸输入性病媒生物截获情况分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024 , 35(1) : 95 -99 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2024.01.017

Abstract

Objective To analyze the surveillance data of intercepted medical vectors at Zhongshan Port from 2017 to 2022, and to summarize the law of intercepted medical vectors at Zhongshan Port, so as to provide the reference for the formulation of vector surveillance strategies at the port and prevention of the infectious diseases transmission. Methods Descriptive statistical method was used to analyze the species composition, number, origin, and transportation route of vectors intercepted from inbound cargoes at Zhongshan Port from 2017 to 2022. Results From 2017 to 2022, the vectors intercepted at Zhongshan Port involved 51 species of 5 categories: cockroaches, flies, mosquitoes, rodents, and midges. Among the intercepted cockroaches, Periplaneta americana, P. australasiae, Panchlora nivea, and Blattella germanica accounted for 36.48%, 28.36%, 17.64%, and 13.37% of the total number, respectively. Megaselia scalaris, Musca domestica, Mu. sorbens, and Calliphora vicina accounted for 26.14%, 25.00%, 12.50%, and 11.36% of the total number of intercepted flies, respectively. Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus, Aedes togoi, and Ae. albopictus accounted for 85.11%, 7.98%, and 3.72% of the total number of mosquitoes, respectively. Rattus tanezumi was the main rodent species. Culicoides peregrinus was the predominant midge species. The cockroaches were mainly from Guyana, and the flies and mosquitoes were mainly from Hong Kong, China. The vectors were mainly carried into China through raw wood logs, containers, and inbound ships for maintenance. Wood logs carried various organisms, among which cockroaches were most common, with a percentage of 48.41%. Conclusions The intercepted vectors were diverse in species and in the source of origin, and six species were intercepted for the first time across domestic ports, with no domestic distribution, indicating high risks of vector invasion and associated potential public health problem. It is of great significance to further strengthen the detection, identification, surveillance, and control of vectors at ports.

参考文献

[1] 孙玉琴,蒋辰燕. 中山市港口发展现状及对策研究[J]. 珠江水运,2011(12):67-69. DOI:10.14125/j.cnki.zjsy.2011.12.019.Sun YQ,Jiang CY. Research on the development and countermeasures of port in Zhongshan city[J]. Pearl River Water Transp,2011(12):67-69. DOI:10.14125/j.cnki.zjsy.2011. 12.019.(in Chinese)
[2] 程军,吴燕子. 中山港口发展评价[J]. 珠江水运,2020(21):93-94. DOI:10.14125/j.cnki.zjsy.2020.21.043.Cheng J,Wu YZ. Evaluation on Zhongshan port development[J]. Pearl River Water Transp,2020(21):93-94. DOI:10.14125/j.cnki.zjsy.2020.21.043.(in Chinese)
[3] 吴燕子,姜伟,李强. 中山市港口发展分析[J]. 珠江水运,2020(16):92-93. DOI:10.14125/j.cnki.zjsy.2020.16.041.Wu YZ,Jiang W,Li Q. Analysis of port development in Zhongshan city[J]. Pearl River Water Transp,2020(16):92-93. DOI:10.14125/j.cnki.zjsy.2020.16.041.(in Chinese)
[4] 蔡丽萍. 常熟地区国境卫生检疫现状与管理对策研究[D]. 苏州:苏州大学,2011.Cai LP. Status of health and quarantine in Changshu and management countermeasure[D]. Suzhou:Soochow University,2011. (in Chinese)
[5] 徐云庆,赵纯中,史蕾,等. 国境口岸医学媒介生物研究进展[J]. 中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2009,32(5):378-393. DOI:10.16408/j.1004-9770.2009.05.020.Xu YQ,Zhao CZ,Shi L,et al. Research development on medical vectors at frontier port[J]. Chin J Front Health Quar,2009,32(5):378-393. DOI:10.16408/j.1004-9770.2009.05.020.(in Chinese)
[6] 林颖峥,张冠楠,李树清,等. 口岸入侵病媒生物特征及防控策略[J]. 中国动物检疫,2019,36(9):29-32. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-944X.2019.09.007.Lin YZ,Zhang GN,Li SQ,et al. Analysis on biological characteristics of invasive vectors at border ports and relevant control measures[J]. China Anim Health Insp,2019,36(9):29-32. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-944X.2019.09.007.(in Chinese)
[7] 聂维忠,聂晨辉,贺骥,等. 开展21世纪海上丝绸之路沿线国家输入性病媒生物监测与防控研究,服务国家发展战略,切实维护国门安全[J]. 口岸卫生控制,2020,25(3):23-27. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5777.2020.03.007.Nie WZ,Nie CH,He J,et al. Developing the monitoring and control research on introduced vectors at countries along the 21st-century maritime silk road jointly serveing the national development strategyand safeguarding the national gate security effectively[J]. Port Health Control,2020,25(3):23-27. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5777.2020.03.007.(in Chinese)
[8] 裘炯良,郑剑宁,赵瑞,等. 宁波口岸外来有害生物截获情况及国境口岸检疫对策[J]. 中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2011,34(5):379-381. DOI:10.16408/j.1004-9770.2011.05.019.Qiu JL,Zheng JN,Zhao R,et al. Analysis of exotic pests captured for the first time at Ningbo Port and strategies of quarantine[J]. Chin J Front Health Quar,2011,34(5):379-381. DOI:10.16408/j.1004-9770.2011.05.019.(in Chinese)
[9] Katial RK. Cockroach allergy[J]. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am,2003,23(3):483-499. DOI:10.1016/s0889-8561(03)00002-x.
[10] Khamesipour F,Lankarani KB,Honarvar B,et al. A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.)[J]. BMC Public Health,2018,18(1):1049. DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-5934-3.
[11] Tsagaan A,Kanuka I,Okado K. Study of pathogenic bacteria detected in fly samples using universal primer-multiplex PCR[J]. Mong J Agric Sci,2015,15(2):27-32. DOI:10.5564/mjas.v15i2.541.
[12] Chandrasegaran K,Lahondère C,Escobar LE,et al. Linking mosquito ecology,traits,behavior,and disease transmission[J]. Trends Parasitol,2020,36(4):393-403. DOI:10.1016/j.pt.2020.02.001.
[13] Guo XX,Li CX,Deng YQ,et al. Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus:A potential vector to transmit Zika virus[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect,2016,5(1):e102. DOI:10.1038/emi.2016.102.
[14] Hernández-Triana LM,Folly AJ,Sewgobind S,et al. Susceptibility of Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus to Japanese encephalitis virus[J]. Parasit Vectors,2022,15(1):210. DOI:10.1186/s13071-022-05329-0.
[15] 梁莹,徐烨,殷颖璇,等. 中国重要外来入侵媒介和病原生物名录(2023版)[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2023,34(2):129-136,144. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2023.02.001.Liang Y,Xu Y,Yin YX,et al. Catalogue of major invasive alien vectors and pathogens in China (2023 version)[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2023,34(2):129-136,144. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2023.02.001.(in Chinese)
[16] 李婷婷,魏晓雅,陈健,等. 首次截获弯曲歪尾蠊(Phyllodromiidae:Symploce)[J]. 寄生虫与医学昆虫学报,2021,28(1):41-45. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0507.2021. 01.007.Li TT,Wei XY,Chen J,et al. Symploce incuriosa-firstly intercepted cockroach in China[J]. Acta Parasitol Med Entomol Sin,2021,28(1):41-45. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0507.2021. 01.007.(in Chinese)
[17] 刘德星,李婷婷,魏晓雅,等. 口岸截获国内未见分布种小异甲蠊(Diplopterina parva)形态学与分子生物学鉴定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2022,33(6):859-864. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.06.018.Liu DX,Li TT,Wei XY,et al. Morphological and molecular identification of a non-recorded cockroach species,Diplopterina parva,inceperated at a port of China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2022,33(6):859-864. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003. 8280.2022.06.018.(in Chinese)
[18] 李婷婷,刘德星,陈健,等. 首次截获2种国内未见分布拉丁蠊属(Latindiinae:Latindia)蜚蠊的形态学鉴定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2022,33(5):742-747. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.05.024.Li TT,Liu DX,Chen J,et al. Morphological identification of two non-recorded cockroach species (Latindiinae:Latindia) firstly intercepted in China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2022,33(5):742-747. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.05.024. (in Chinese)
[19] 国为栋. 新冠疫情对我国国际贸易的影响研究[D]. 上海:上海财经大学,2021. DOI:10.27296/d.cnki.gshcu.2021.001132.Guo WD. Study on the impact of COVID-19 on China's international trade[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai University of Finance and Econ,2021. DOI:10.27296/d.cnki.gshcu.2021.001132.(in Chinese)
[20] 刘起勇. 2005-2020年我国媒介生物传染病报告病例:流行趋势、防控挑战及应对策略[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2022,33(1):1-7. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.01.001.Liu QY. Reported cases of vector-borne diseases in China,2005-2020:Epidemic trend,challenges in prevention and control,and related coping strategies[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2022,33(1):1-7. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.01.001.(in Chinese)
[21] 杨光,吴新华,陆军,等. 进境木材检验检疫风险分析及对策建议[J]. 植物检疫,2013,27(1):92-94.Yang G,Wu XH,Lu J,et al. Risk analysis and countermeasures for inspection and quarantine of imported timber[J]. Plant Quar,2013,27(1):92-94. (in Chinese)
[22] 黄昕恒,何汉标,王章根,等. 中山口岸进口原木的检疫与管理[J]. 植物检疫,2003,17(2):100-101. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2003.02.017.Huang XH,He HB,Wang ZG,et al. Quarantine and management of imported logs at Zhongshan Port[J]. Plant Quar,2003,17(2):100-101. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2003.02.017.(in Chinese)
[23] 吕飞,简保磊,罗春阳,等. 2012-2017年我国进口木材截获有害生物疫情数据分析[J]. 植物检疫,2018,32(3):68-72. DOI:10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2018.03.016.Lyu F,Jian BL,Luo CY,et al. Analysis of pest interception from imported timber during 2012-2017[J]. Plant Quar,2018,32(3):68-72. DOI:10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2018.03.016.(in Chinese)
[24] 吴建峰,陈向,汤燕. 南通口岸进境集装箱重箱卫生检疫疫情截获风险分析及防控对策[J]. 中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2010,33(2):120-122. DOI:10.16408/j.1004-9770.2010.02.019.Wu JF,Chen X,Tang Y. Risk analysis and prevention and control measures of epidemic interception of heavy container health quarantine at Nantong Port[J]. Chin J Front Health Quar,2010,33(2):120-122. DOI:10.16408/j.1004-9770.2010.02.019.(in Chinese)
文章导航

/