疟疾防控专题

基于16S rRNA高通量测序的现场中华按蚊及其孳生地水体菌群结构研究

展开
  • 1. 海军军医大学基础医学院病原生物学教研室, 上海 200433;
    2. 海军军医大学海军医学系, 上海 200433
董昊炜,男,在读硕士,主要从事病媒生物学研究,E-mail:donghaowei98@163.com

收稿日期: 2021-05-20

  网络出版日期: 2021-10-20

基金资助

上海市自然科学基金(19ZR1469600);国家自然科学基金(31970445);后勤科研课题重大项目(ALB19 J003)

Composition of microbiota in Anopheles sinensis and water in larvae breeding site: A study based on 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing

Expand
  • 1. Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Basic Medical, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
    2. College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China

Received date: 2021-05-20

  Online published: 2021-10-20

Supported by

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai of China (No. 19ZR1469600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31970445) and Major Projects of Logistical Research (No. ALB19 J003)

摘要

目的 了解现场中华按蚊与孳生地水体的细菌菌群组成,分析其间的差异性。方法 采集上海市嘉定现场的中华按蚊雌蚊,分为未吸血雌蚊(A)和饱血雌蚊(B)2组,以及孳生地水样(W),分别提取宏基因组DNA。应用Illumina Miseq高通量测序技术测定16S rDNA V4变异区。整理统计测得的序列数目和操作分类单元(OTUs),分析细菌菌群的组成和丰度、细菌群落的丰富度和多样性,以及菌群组成在群落间的变化率,并与其幼蚊(L)进行菌群结构的比较。结果 获得优质序列数和精简后OTUs数分别为129 056和2 622.5(A)、171 734和3 324.5(B)、225 890.5和2 997(W)。精简后的OTUs隶属20个门,144个科,295个属。Chao1指数从高到低为B>W>A,辛普森指数为B>W>A,香农指数为A>B>W。分析细菌菌群丰度显示,A与B样本中优势菌均隶属变形菌门和厚壁菌门,丰度高的细菌为不动杆菌属(A,41.35%;B,25.71%)和泛菌属(A,10.58%;B,12.70%),B样本的Asaia丰度最高为40.85%。W样本中优势菌均隶属厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门和变形菌门,丰度>10.00%的为Desulfosporosinus(24.19%)、弯杆菌属(19.48%)、产黄菌属(15.27%)、假单胞菌属(12.19%)和Alkalibacter(10.28%)。各样本间细菌菌群差异的t检验结果显示,成蚊A与B样本间差异有统计学意义的门为1个,而W样本与幼蚊、成蚊之间为9个。主成分分析可见同组的样本间细菌多样性相近;热图聚类分析显示W与L聚为一支,B与A聚为另一支。结论 获得了现场中华按蚊雌蚊和孳生地稻田水体的细菌菌群组成,雌蚊共生的优势菌群为不动杆菌属、泛菌属和Asaia;W样本中的细菌与其中生活的幼蚊之间、雌蚊A与B样本间的细菌菌群相似程度高。

本文引用格式

董昊炜, 南春燕, 周秋明, 袁浩, 李翔宇, 彭恒, 马雅军 . 基于16S rRNA高通量测序的现场中华按蚊及其孳生地水体菌群结构研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021 , 32(5) : 533 -540 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2021.05.005

Abstract

Objective To investigate the differences in the microbial composition in Anopheles sinensis and water in larvae breeding site. Methods An. sinensis adults were collected from Jiading district, Shanghai, China and divided into unfed (A) and fed (B) groups. Water samples were collected from paddy fields in the same area (W). Metagenomic DNA was extracted and the 16S rDNA V4 region was subjected to Illumina Miseq high-throughput sequencing. The sequence number and operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were used for statistical analysis of the composition and abundance of microflorae, the richness and diversity of bacterial communities, and changes in bacterial composition across communities, which were compared with the microbial composition in An. sinensis larvae (L). Results The numbers of high-quality sequences and clustered OTUs were 129 056/2 622.5 (A), 171 734/3 324.5 (B), and 225 890.5/2 997 (W), respectively. The clustered OTUs were assigned to 20 phyla, 144 families, and 295 genera. The bacterial richness as indicated by Chao1 index was in the order of B>W>A. The bacterial diversity was B>W>A (Simpson index) or A>B>W (Shannon index). The dominant bacteria in fed and unfed adults were Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, and the abundant genera were Acinetobacter (A, 41.35%; B, 25.71%) and Pantoea (A, 10.85%; B, 12.70%). Asaia was the most abundant (40.85%) in fed adults. In paddy field water, the dominant bacteria were Firmicutes, Bacteroides, and Proteobacteria. The genera with >10.00% abundances were Desulfosporosinus (24.19%), Flectobacillus (19.48%), Flavobacterium (15.27%), Pseudomonas (12.19%), and Alkalibacter (10.28%). As shown by the t test, the numbers of phyla with statistical differences between A, B, and L were 1 (B/A), 9 (L/A), and 9 (W/A). Principal component analysis showed similar bacterial diversity among samples in the same group, and heatmap showed that W and L clustered into one clade, while B and A into another clade. Conclusion An. sinensis adults are dominated by Acinetobacter, Pantoea, and Asaia. The composition of bacteria in paddy field water is similar to those in larvae living in the water as well as fed and unfed female mosquitos.

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院中国动物志编辑委员会. 中国动物志.第八卷.昆虫纲. 双翅目:蚊科(上)[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1997:4-33.Editorial Board of Zoology of China,Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fauna sinica.Vol. 8. Insecta. Diptera:Culicidae 1[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1997:4-33.
[2] 张丽,丰俊,夏志贵,等. 2019年全国疟疾疫情特征分析及消除工作进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2020,38(2):133-138. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2020.02.001.Zhang L,Feng J,Xia ZG,et al. Epidemiological characteristics of malaria and progress on its elimination in China in 2019[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis,2020,38(2):133-138. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2020.02.001.
[3] 曹俊,刘耀宝,曹园园,等. 中国消除疟疾的持续挑战:输入性疟疾[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2018,36(2):93-96.Cao J,Liu YB,Cao YY,et al. Sustained challenge to malaria elimination in China:imported malaria[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis,2018,36(2):93-96.
[4] Gao H,Cui CL,Wang LL,et al. Mosquito microbiota and implications for disease control[J]. Trends Parasitol,2020,36(2):98-111. DOI:10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.001.
[5] Romoli O,Gendrin M. The tripartite interactions between the mosquito,its microbiota and Plasmodium[J]. Parasit Vectors,2018,11:200. DOI:10.1186/s13071-018-2784-x.
[6] Sharma P,Rani J,Chauhan C,et al. Altered gut microbiota and immunity defines Plasmodium vivax survival in Anopheles stephensi[J]. Front Immunol,2020,11:609. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00609.
[7] Boissière A,Tchioffo MT,Bachar D,et al. Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection[J]. PLoS Pathog,2012,8(5):e1002742. DOI:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002742.
[8] Dong YM,Manfredini F,Dimopoulos G. Implication of the mosquito midgut microbiota in the defense against malaria parasites[J]. PLoS Pathog,2009,5(5):e1000423. DOI:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000423.
[9] Bando H,Okado K,Guelbeogo WM,et al. Intra-specific diversity of Serratia marcescens in Anopheles mosquito midgut defines Plasmodium transmission capacity[J]. Sci Rep,2013,3:1641. DOI:10.1038/srep01641.
[10] Gonzalez-Ceron L,Santillan F,Rodriguez MH,et al. Bacteria in midguts of field-collected Anopheles albimanus block Plasmodium vivax sporogonic development[J]. J Med Entomol,2003,40(3):371-374. DOI:10.1603/0022-2585-40.3.371.
[11] Wang SB,Ghosh AK,Bongio N,et al. Fighting malaria with engineered symbiotic bacteria from vector mosquitoes[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2012,109(31):12734-12739. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1204158109/-/DCSupplemental.
[12] Kajla MK. Symbiotic bacteria as potential agents for mosquito control[J]. Trends Parasitol,2020,36(1):4-7. DOI:10.1016/j.pt.2019.07.003.
[13] 李美,汤林华. 中华按蚊实验室种群中肠内细菌菌群分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2010,28(2):143-147.Li M,Tang LH. The midgut bacterial flora in lab-reared Anopheles sinensis[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis,2010,28(2):143-147.
[14] 王丹丹. 中华按蚊肠道细菌分子多态性研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2008.Wang DD. Molecular diversity of the intestine bacterial community of Anopheles sinensis (Diptera:Culicidae)[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2008.
[15] 翟小战. 中华按蚊肠道细菌群落的研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2014.Zhai XZ. The intestinal bacterial flora community structure of Anopheles sinensis mosquitoes (Diptera:Culicidae)[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2014.
[16] 南春燕,马雅军,徐建农,等. 中华按蚊幼虫肠道细菌宏基因组的组成研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2013,31(2):114-119.Nan CY,Ma YJ,Xu JN,et al. Taxonomic composition of metagenomic community in the larval gut of mosquito Anopheles sinensis (Diptera:Culicidae)[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis,2013,31(2):114-119.
[17] Gao H,Bai L,Jiang YM,et al. A natural symbiotic bacterium drives mosquito refractoriness to Plasmodium infection via secretion of an antimalarial lipase[J]. Nat Microbiol,2021,6(6):806-817. DOI:10.1038/s41564-021-00899-8.
[18] Bai L,Wang LL,Vega-Rodríguez J,et al. A gut symbiotic bacterium Serratia marcescens renders mosquito resistance to Plasmodium infection through activation of mosquito immune responses[J]. Front Microbiol,2019,10:1580. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01580.
[19] Tran Q,Pham DT,Phan V. Using 16S rRNA gene as marker to detect unknown bacteria in microbial communities[J]. BMC Bioinformatics,2017,18(14):499. DOI:10.1186/s12859-017-1901-8.
[20] Wang Y,Gilbreath Ⅲ TM,Kukutla P,et al. Dynamic gut microbiome across life history of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Kenya[J]. PLoS One,2011,6(9):e24767. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0024767.
[21] Champion CJ,Xu JN. The impact of metagenomic interplay on the mosquito redox homeostasis[J]. Free Radic Biol Med,2017,105:79-85. DOI:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.031.
[22] Gimonneau G,Tchioffo MT,Abate L,et al. Composition of Anopheles coluzzii and An. gambiae microbiota from larval to adult stages[J]. Infect Genet Evol,2014,28:715-724. DOI:10.1016/j.meegid.2014.09.029.
[23] Osei-Poku J,Mbogo CM,Palmer WJ,et al. Deep sequencing reveals extensive variation in the gut microbiota of wild mosquitoes from Kenya[J]. Mol Ecol,2012,21(20):5138-5150. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05759.x.
[24] 彭恒,陈翰明,陈辉莹,等. 我国赫坎按蚊种团的分子鉴别及中华按蚊的区系分布研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2020,38(1):58-66,73. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2020.01.009.Peng H,Chen HM,Chen HY,et al. Molecular identification of Anopheles hyrcanus group and faunal distribution of An. sinensis (Diptera:Culicidae) in China[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis,2020,38(1):58-66,73. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2020.01.009.
[25] Wang Y,Qian PY. Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies[J]. PLoS One,2009,4(10):e7401. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0007401.
[26] Li KL,Chen HY,Jiang JJ,et al. Diversity of bacteriome associated with Phlebotomus chinensis (Diptera:Psychodidae) sand flies in two wild populations from China[J]. Sci Rep,2016,6:36406. DOI:10.1038/srep36406.
[27] de O Gaio A,Gusmão DS,Santos AV,et al. Contribution of midgut bacteria to blood digestion and egg production in Aedes aegypti (Diptera:Culicidae) (L.)[J]. Parasit Vectors,2011,4:105. DOI:10.1186/1756-3305-4-105.
[28] Zouache K,Raharimalala FN,Raquin V,et al. Bacterial diversity of field-caught mosquitoes,Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti,from different geographic regions of Madagascar[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol,2011,75(3):377-389. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01012.x.
[29] Alfano N,Tagliapietra V,Rosso F,et al. Changes in microbiota across developmental stages of Aedes koreicus,an invasive mosquito vector in Europe:indications for microbiota-based control strategies[J]. Front Microbiol,2019,10:2832. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02832.
[30] Akorli J,Namaali PA,Ametsi GW,et al. Generational conservation of composition and diversity of field-acquired midgut microbiota in Anopheles gambiae (sensu lato) during colonization in the laboratory[J]. Parasit Vectors,2019,12:27. DOI:10.1186/s13071-019-3287-0.
[31] Kalappa DM,Subramani PA,Basavanna SK,et al. Influence of midgut microbiota in Anopheles stephensi on Plasmodium berghei infections[J]. Malar J,2018,17:385. DOI:10.1186/s12936-018-2535-7.
[32] Zoure AA,Sare AR,Yameogo F,et al. Bacterial communities associated with the midgut microbiota of wild Anopheles gambiae complex in Burkina Faso[J]. Mol Biol Rep,2020,47:211-224. DOI:10.1007/s11033-019-05121-x.
[33] Coon KL,Vogel KJ,Brown MR,et al. Mosquitoes rely on their gut microbiota for development[J]. Mol Ecol,2014,23(11):2727-2739. DOI:10.1111/mec.12771.
[34] Feng XY,Huang LB,Lin L,et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of the primary malaria vector Anopheles sinensis (Diptera:Culicidae) in China inferred by cox1 gene[J]. Parasit Vectors,2017,10:75. DOI:10.1186/s13071-017-2013-z.
[35] Gabrieli P,Caccia S,Varotto-Boccazzi I,et al. Mosquito trilogy:microbiota,immunity and pathogens,and their implications for the control of disease transmission[J]. Front Microbiol,2021,12:630438. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2021.630438.
[36] Mancini MV,Damiani C,Accoti A,et al. Estimating bacteria diversity in different organs of nine species of mosquito by next generation sequencing[J]. BMC Microbiol,2018,18:126. DOI:10.1186/s12866-018-1266-9.
文章导航

/