论著

浙江省宁波市登革热暴发疫情媒介伊蚊控制措施效果分析

展开
  • 宁波市疾病预防控制中心消毒与媒介生物防制所, 浙江 宁波 315010
马晓,男,副主任医师,主要从事媒介生物防制工作,Email:505142472@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-10-26

  网络出版日期: 2020-04-20

基金资助

浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2019KY634);宁波市医学科技计划(2017A29)

Effects of vector control in dengue fever outbreak response in Ningbo, Zhejiang province, China

Expand
  • Ningbo City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang Province, China

Received date: 2019-10-26

  Online published: 2020-04-20

Supported by

Supported by the Medical Research Program of Zhejiang Province (No. 2019KY634) and Ningbo Medical Science and Technology Project (No. 2017A29)

摘要

目的 对宁波市城区登革热暴发疫情监测数据进行分析,比较3种媒介控制方法对伊蚊成蚊密度及布雷图指数(BI)的控制效果,为制定当地登革热应急处置措施提供依据。方法 采用超低容量喷雾、热烟雾剂、滞留喷洒、缓释剂及环境整治联合防制方法控制蚊虫,其中措施1为超低容量喷雾、热烟雾剂、缓释剂及环境整治联合防制方法,措施2为超低容量喷雾、滞留喷洒、缓释剂及环境整治联合防制方法,措施3为超低容量喷雾、热烟雾剂、滞留喷洒、缓释剂及环境整治联合防制方法,比较3种控制措施伊蚊帐诱指数下降率及其BI控制效果。帐诱指数下降率采用方差分析或秩和检验分析;BI控制效果采用曲线拟合分析。结果 3种控制措施帐诱指数第1天、第2天下降率依次分别为0.24±0.41、0.20±0.64、0.47±0.17和0.27±0.27、0.55±0.27、0.47±0.39,差异无统计学意义(F=1.659,P=0.206;F=2.236,P=0.123),第3天下降率分别为0.31±0.57、0.44±0.46和0.77±0.27,差异有统计学意义(F=3.397,P=0.046),以措施3帐诱指数下降率最高(0.77±0.27);3种控制措施下BI下降到安全阈值(BI<5)所用时间分别为3.58、3.36和2.62 d,BI下降到5以措施3所用时间最短。结论 超低容量喷雾、热烟雾剂、滞留喷洒、缓释剂及环境整治联合防制在本次登革热应急控制中效果较好。

本文引用格式

马晓, 杨思嘉, 王桂安, 马敏 . 浙江省宁波市登革热暴发疫情媒介伊蚊控制措施效果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020 , 31(2) : 190 -193 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2020.02.014

Abstract

Objective To analyze the Aedes surveillance data of dengue fever outbreak in urban Ningbo, Zhejiang province, China, and compare the effects of three vector control measure packages on the density of adult Aedes mosquitoes and Breteau index (BI), and to provide a basis for formulating emergency management of dengue in the locality. Methods Three different comprehensive measure packages were used to control mosquitoes:measure package 1 included ultra-low-volume spraying, thermal fogging, slow-release agent, and environmental management; measure package 2 included ultra-low- volume spraying, residual spraying, slow-release agent, and environmental management; measure package 3 combined the 5 methods mentioned in measure package 1 and 2. The decline rate with net trap index and control effect with BI were compared between the 3 measure packages using ANOVA or rank sum test and curve fitting, respectively. Results There were no significant differences in the decline rate with net trap index between the 3 measure packages on the first day (0.24±0.41, 0.20±0.64, 0.47±0.17; F=1.659, P=0.206) and second day (0.27±0.27, 0.55±0.27, 0.47±0.39; F=2.236, P=0.123); significant difference was found on the third day (0.31±0.57, 0.44±0.46, 0.77±0.27; F=3.397, P=0.046), and measure package 3 showed the highest decline rate. Time to safety threshold of BI (decrease to less than 5) for the 3 measure packages were 3.58, 3.36, and 2.62 d, respectively, with the shortest time for measure package 3. Conclusion Combination of ultra-low-volume spraying, thermal fogging, residual spraying, slow-release agent, and environmental management works for Aedes control in the emergency response of the dengue fever outbreak.

参考文献

[1] 孟凤霞,王义冠,冯磊,等. 我国登革热疫情防控与媒介伊蚊的综合治理[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2015,26(1):4-10. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.01.002. Meng FX,Wang YG,Feng L,et al. Review on dengue prevention and control and integrated mosquito management in China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2015,26(1):4-10. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.01.002.
[2] 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国疾控中心印发登革热防治技术指南[EB/OL]. (2014-09-25)[2019-02-28]. http://www.chinacdc.cn/jkzt/crb/zl/dgr/jszl_2235/201409/t20140929_104958.html. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Technical guidelines for dengue fever control[EB/OL]. (2014-09-25)[2019-02-28]. http://www.chinacdc.cn/jkzt/crb/zl/dgr/jszl_2235/201409/t20140929_104958.html.
[3] Bonds JAS. Ultra-low-volume space sprays in mosquito control:a critical review[J]. Med Vet Entomol,2012,26(2):121-130. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00992.x.
[4] Space spray application of insecticides for vector and public health pest control. WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2003.5[Z]. 2003.
[5] 景钦隆,王鸣. 登革热媒介控制研究进展[J]. 疾病监测,2016,31(10):808-813. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2016.10.004. Jing QL,Wang M. Progress in research of dengue fever vector control[J]. Dis Surveill,2016,31(10):808-813. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2016.10.004.
[6] 钱薇萍,胡雅劼,李观翠,等. 绿篱技术对白纹伊蚊的现场防治效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2018,29(4):361-363. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.04.010. Qian WP,Hu YJ,Li GC,et al. Field control effect of vegetation barrier treatment on Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2018,29(4):361-363. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003. 8280.2018.04.010.
[7] 董言德,赵彤言,汪中明,等. 02 I型摩托车载超低容量喷雾系统的研制及对蚊虫的杀灭效果[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2008,19(1):21-24. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692. 2008.01.009. Dong YD,Zhao TY,Wang ZM,et al. Development and testing of 02 I type of motor-mounted ultra low volume system for mosquito control[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2008,19(1):21-24. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2008.01.009.
[8] 王飞,陆珏磊,蒋璐,等. 热烟雾喷洒技术现场控制白纹伊蚊的效果研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2017,23(3):212-215. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2017.03.003. Wang F,Lu JL,Jiang L,et al. Evaluation of thermal fog spraying for the control of Aedes albopictus in field[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2017,23(3):212-215. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781. 2017.03.003.
[9] 宫占威,刘增加,杨银书,等. 高效滞留喷洒剂杀灭蚊虫的效果研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2004,10(2):101-102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2004.02.010. Gong ZW,Liu ZJ,Yang YS,et al. Efficacy of high efficient detained spraying insecticide against mosquitoes[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2004,10(2):101-102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2004.02.010.
[10] 陈文江,吴开琛,吴开录,等. 登革热数学模型及其应用研究(Ⅱ):利用数学模型评价不同措施对登革热的防治效应[J]. 中国热带医学,2001,1(2):117-120. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1009-9727.2001.02.012. Chen WJ,Wu KC,Wu KL,et al. Studies on mathematical model of dengue fever and its application (Ⅱ)-Using mathematical model to evaluate the effect of different measures on the control of dengue fever[J]. China Trop Med,2001,1(2):117-120. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9727.2001.02.012.
[11] Paredes-Esquivel C,Lenhart A,Del Río R,et al. The impact of indoor residual spraying of deltamethrin on dengue vector populations in the Peruvian Amazon[J]. Acta Trop,2015,154:139-144. DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.10.020.
[12] 周毅彬,赵彤言,冷培恩. 孳生地治理对控制白纹伊蚊效果的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2009,20(1):3-6. Zhou YB,Zhao TY,Leng PE,et al. Evaluation on the control efficacy of source reduction to Aedes albopictus in Shanghai,China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2009,20(1):3-6.
[13] 徐仁权,刘洪霞,冷培恩,等. 0.5%吡丙醚颗粒剂对白纹伊蚊控制效果的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2010,21(4):297-299. Xu RQ,Liu HX,Leng PE,et al. Effectiveness of 0.5% pyriproxyfen granules for Aedes albopictus control[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2010,21(4):297-299.
[14] 冷培恩,徐仁权,刘洪霞,等. 1%双硫磷砂粒剂现场灭蚊幼效果研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2008,14(5):330-333. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2008.05.002. Leng PE,Xu RQ,Liu HX,et al. Control efficacy of 1% temophos granule to mosquito larvae in the field[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2008,14(5):330-333. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2008.05.002.
[15] Abu Hassan A,Che Salmah MR,Ngumbang J,et al. Mosquitoes of urban areas of Penang:abundance and control[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Urban Pests. Malaysia:International Conference on Urban Pests,2005:257-263.
[16] 高强,曹晖,周毅彬,等. 成蚊密度与蚊幼孳生状况的相关性研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2014,20(4):323-325,328. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2014.04.010. Gao Q,Cao H,Zhou YB,et al. Correlation analysis between adult mosquito density and larvae breeding conditions[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2014,20(4):323-325. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2014.04.010.
[17] 陈祖华,黄进,唐刚,等. 攀枝花市登革热媒介白纹伊蚊防制效果研究[J]. 医学动物防制,2016,32(11):1208-1210. DOI:10.7629/yxdwfz201611009. Chen ZH,Huang J,Tang G,et al. Study on control effect of dengue vector Aedes albopictus in Panzhihua city[J]. J Med Pest Control,2016,32(11):1208-1210. DOI:10.7629/yxdwfz201611009.
文章导航

/