调查研究

上海市松江区2017-2018年登革热媒介伊蚊幼蚊监测分析

展开
  • 1 上海市松江区疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病和病媒生物防治科, 上海 201620;
    2 上海市疾病预防控制中心, 上海 200336
吕锡宏,男,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事病媒生物监测及控制工作,Email:xihonglv@126.com

收稿日期: 2019-09-25

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-20

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“十三五”课题(2017ZX10303404001006);上海市松江区科学技术攻关项目(16SJGG26)

Surveillance of the dengue vector Aedes larvae in Songjiang district, Shanghai, China, 2017-2018

Expand
  • 1 Songjiang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Songjiang 201620, Shanghai, China;
    2 Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Received date: 2019-09-25

  Online published: 2020-02-20

Supported by

Supported by the 13th Five-Year Plan for National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2017ZX10303404001006) and Scientific and Technological Project of Songjiang, Shanghai (No. 16SJGG26)

摘要

目的 分析2017-2018年上海市松江区白纹伊蚊幼蚊密度季节消长、生境分布及空间变化,为当地登革热防控提供参考依据。方法 在松江区多个街道(镇)设立监测点,于2017、2018年的4-11月采用布雷图指数(BI)法和诱蚊诱卵器法监测白纹伊蚊密度,每月中旬1次。利用Excel 2003、SPSS 16.0软件进行分析,不同生境的密度差异采用χ2检验,BI和诱蚊诱卵指数(MOI)的相关性采用Pearson相关分析,利用Epi Info 3.5.4软件制作白纹伊蚊密度空间分布地图。结果 松江区白纹伊蚊幼蚊密度从4-5月开始升高,6-8月达到高峰,之后逐渐下降,2018年平均BI为7.09,峰值为15.23(7月);平均MOI为10.61,峰值为18.50(8月),均高于2017年;同期的BI和MOI呈正相关(r=0.881,P<0.001)。不同生境中,BI法监测的居民区白纹伊蚊幼蚊密度最高(BI为8.63),其次是工地和学校;MOI法监测废品收购站白纹伊蚊幼蚊密度最高(MOI为10.53),其次是居民区和其他外环境。2018年松江区15个街道(镇)的平均MOI显示,有1个街道达到区域流行风险,7个街道(镇)达到暴发风险,6个街道(镇)达到传播风险,只有1个镇MOI<5,密度较高区域主要集中在中部及北部街道(镇),整体上登革热发生风险高于2017年。结论 松江区登革热发生和流行的风险较高,建议当地相关部门应进一步加强白纹伊蚊监测及其控制,防止输入性登革热病例引起本地病例的发生或疫情暴发。

本文引用格式

吕锡宏, 郭晓芹, 费胜军, 庞博文, 冷培恩 . 上海市松江区2017-2018年登革热媒介伊蚊幼蚊监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020 , 31(1) : 78 -82 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2020.01.016

Abstract

Objective To analyze seasonal, habitat, and spatial variation in the density of Aedes albopictus larvae in Songjiang district, Shanghai, China, 2017-2018, and to provide evidence for prevention and control of dengue. Methods Surveillance points were set up in several sub-districts/towns of Songjiang district, and surveillance was done once during the middle ten days of every month from April to November, 2017-2018, using the Breteau index method and mosquito-oviposition trapping method for monitoring the density of Aedes mosquitoes. Excel 2003 and SPSS 16.0 softwares were employed to perform analyses; the chi-square test was used to analyze the difference in mosquito density between different habitats; Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between Breteau index (BI) and mosq-ovitrap index (MOI). Epi Info 3.5.4 software was employed to map the spatial distribution of Ae. albopictus density. Results The larval density of Ae. albopictus in Songjiang district increased from April to May, peaked during June to August, and then decreased gradually. In 2018, BI averaged 7.09 and peaked at 15.23 in July; MOI averaged 10.61 and peaked at 18.50 in August; the values were higher than those in 2017. BI and MOI in the same period were positively correlated (r=0.881, P<0.001). Among different habitats, BI assessment showed that residential areas had the highest density (BI=8.63), followed by construction sites and schools; MOI assessment showed that waste collection stations had the highest density (MOI=10.53), followed by residential areas and other outdoor environment. In 2018, mean MOI data from 15 sub-districts/towns in Songjiang district showed that 1 sub-district had risk of a regional epidemic, 7 sub-districts/towns had risk of an outbreak, 6 sub-districts/towns had spreading risk, and only 1 town had a density of less than 5; the areas with relatively high density were concentrated in central and northern sub-districts/towns. The overall risk of dengue in 2018 was higher than that in 2017. Conclusion The occurrence and epidemic risk of dengue is relatively high in Songjiang district, suggesting that local authorities should further strengthen surveillance and control of Ae. albopictus to prevent the occurrence or even outbreak of local cases caused by imported dengue cases.

参考文献

[1] Lacour G,Vernichon F,Cadilhac N,et al. When mothers anticipate:effects of the prediapause stage on embryo development time and of maternal photoperiod on eggs of a temperate and a tropical strains of Aedes albopictus (Diptera:Culicidae)[J]. J Insect Physiol,2014,71:87-96. DOI:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.10.008.
[2] 李晨颖,陈晓光. 媒介白纹伊蚊监测和控制技术研究及应用进展[J]. 中国热带医学,2018,18(7):732-736,739. DOI:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2018.07.26. Li CY,Chen XG. Research and application progress of Aedes albopictus monitoring and control techniques[J]. China Trop Med,2018,18(7):732-736,739. DOI:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2018.07.26.
[3] 孟凤霞,王义冠,冯磊,等. 我国登革热疫情防控与媒介伊蚊的综合治理[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2015,26(1):4-10. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.01.002. Meng FX,Wang YG,Feng L,et al. Review on dengue prevention and control and integrated mosquito management in China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2015,26(1):4-10. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.01.002.
[4] 刘仰青,马红梅,柳小青. 南昌地区2016年登革热传播媒介白纹伊蚊密度及抗药性监测[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(5):447-450. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017. 05.009. Liu YQ,Ma HM,Liu XQ. Study on the seasonal dynamics and insecticide resistance of dengue vector,Aedes albopictus,in Nanchang,2016[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2017,28(5):447-450. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.05.009.
[5] 刘起勇. 媒介伊蚊可持续控制策略及关键技术[J]. 新发传染病电子杂志,2018,3(2):75-79. DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2096-2738.2018.02.005. Liu QY. The sustainable control strategy and key technology of Aedes vector[J]. Electr J Emerg Infect Dis,2018,3(2):75-79. DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2096-2738.2018.02.005.
[6] Bhatt S,Gething PW,Brady OJ,et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue[J]. Nature,2013,496(7446):504-507. DOI:10.1038/nature12060.
[7] 吴海霞,刘起勇,刘小波,等. 2006-2013年中国19省白纹伊蚊监测数据分析[J]. 疾病监测:2015,30(4):310-315. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2015.04.016. Wu HX,Liu QY,Liu XB,et al. Surveillance for Aedes albopictus in China,2006-2013[J]. Dis Surveill,2015,30(4):310-315. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2015.04.016.
[8] 徐哲,方利洪,任江萍,等. 2008-2014年建德市登革热蚊媒监测结果[J]. 浙江预防医学,2016,28(3):290-292. DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2016.03.022. Xu Z,Fang LH,Ren JP,et al. Surveillance results of dengue mosquito vectors in Jiande city from 2008 to 2014[J]. Zhejiang Prev Med,2016,28(3):290-292. DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn 1007-0931.2016.03.022.
[9] 龚道方,周红宁. 中国登革热重要媒介白纹伊蚊的研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2009,20(6):607-610. Gong DF,Zhou HN. Progress in dengue fever important vector Aedes albopictus in China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2009,20(6):607-610.
[10] 刘小波,吴海霞,郭玉红,等. 2016年中国媒介伊蚊密度监测结果分析[J]. 疾病监测,2018,33(2):144-149. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2018.02.008. Liu XB,Wu HX,Guo YH,et al. Surveillance on the density of Aedes mosquitoes in China,2016[J]. Dis Surveill,2018,33(2):144-149. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2018.02.008.
[11] 李美青,刘彬,罗雷,等. 伊蚊诱捕器监测法在社区蚊媒监测中的应用[J]. 热带医学杂志,2012,12(10):1260-1263. Li MQ,Liu B,Luo L,et al. The application of Aedes traps for the mosquito monitoring in community[J]. J Trop Med,2012,12(10):1260-1263.
[12] 林立丰,段金花,李荣彪,等. 现场比较诱蚊诱卵器与传统幼虫监测效果的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2006,17(6):454-457. Lin LF,Duan JH,Li RB,et al. Comparative study of the monitoring results of the mosq-ovitrap method and the traditional larval index surveys in the field[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2006,17(6):454-457.
[13] 王韶华,武峥嵘,钟培松,等. 上海市嘉定区白纹伊蚊分布及其种群密度监测[J]. 上海预防医学,2018,30(8):640-644. DOI:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18776. Wang SH,Wu ZR,Zhong PS,et al. Distribution of Aedes albopictus and its population density monitoring in Jiading district of Shanghai[J]. Shanghai J Prev Med,2018,30(8):640-644. DOI:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18776.
[14] 邓惠,刘礼平,蔡松武,等. 广东省2007-2017年白纹伊蚊种群密度调查研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2019,30(1):60-64. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.01.013. Deng H,Liu LP,Cai SW,et al. A study of Aedes albopictus population density in Guangdong province,China,from 2007 to 2017[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2019,30(1):60-64. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.01.013.
[15] 孙春卫,杨迎宇,张勤丽,等. 不同颜色诱蚊诱卵器在白纹伊蚊种群监测中的应用效果研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(6):523-526. Sun CW,Yang YY,Zhang QL,et al. Study on the effect of different color ovitraps in the population monitoring of Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2018,24(6):523-526.
文章导航

/