调查研究

重庆市2018年国家级监测点鼠类监测结果分析

展开
  • 重庆市疾病预防控制中心消毒与媒介生物控制所, 重庆 400042
涂涛田,男,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事虫媒传染病等相关研究,Email:taotiantu@sina.cn

收稿日期: 2019-06-29

  网络出版日期: 2019-12-20

An analysis of rodent surveillance results at national-level surveillance sites in Chongqing, China, 2018

Expand
  • Chongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing 400042, China

Received date: 2019-06-29

  Online published: 2019-12-20

摘要

目的 了解重庆市国家级监测点鼠种类、密度及季节消长情况,为预防和控制鼠传疾病的发生与流行提供依据。方法 2018年1-11月,在重庆市4个国家级监测点采用夹夜法和路径法监测鼠类,采用SPSS 25.0和Excel 2010软件进行统计学分析,构成比之间的比较采用χ2检验。结果 2018年重庆市国家级监测点城镇和农村居民区鼠密度分别为0.98%和0.73%,室内外鼠平均密度为1.15%,以重点行业的鼠密度最高(1.74%);各类场所外环境鼠密度平均路径指数为1.81处/km,以垃圾中转站或公共厕所周围最高(2.86处/km);城镇和农村居民区优势鼠种均为小家鼠,不同生境的鼠种构成差异有统计学意义(χ2=32.814,P<0.001)。结论 初步了解了重庆市鼠类情况,建议各监测点区(县)根据监测结果采取合理的防控措施。

关键词: 鼠类; 监测; 密度; 季节消长

本文引用格式

涂涛田, 冯绍全, 何亚明, 杨雪帆, 肖汉森, 季恒青 . 重庆市2018年国家级监测点鼠类监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019 , 30(6) : 711 -712 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.06.028

Abstract

Objective To investigate the community structure, density, and seasonal variation of rodents at national-level surveillance sites in Chongqing, China, and to provide a basis for the prevention and control of rodent-borne diseases. Methods From January to November, 2018, the trap-at-night method and the route index method were used at four national-level surveillance sites in Chongqing. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of constituent ratio. Results In 2018, the density of rodents was 0.98% in urban surveillance sites and 0.73% in rural surveillance sites, with a mean density of 1.15% indoors and outdoors, and the highest density was observed in special industries (1.74%). The mean route index of rodents was 1.81/km in the external environment of various places, and the highest index was observed in waste transfer stations and public toilets (2.86/km). The dominant species was Mus musculus in both urban and rural areas, and there was a significant difference in the composition of rodent species between different habitats (χ2=32.814, P<0.001). Conclusion This study provides preliminary results of the rodents in Chongqing, and reasonable prevention and control measures should be adopted based on surveillance results in districts and counties.

参考文献

[1] 季恒清,李艳红,李霞,等. 重庆市鼠形动物种类及其地理分布调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2004,15(4):320-322. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2004.04.025.
[2] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 全国病媒生物监测方案[S]. 北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2016.
[3] 杨雪帆,何亚明,季恒青,等. 重庆市2013-2015年鼠密度监测与防治探讨[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2017,23(2):142-145.
[4] 吴海霞,鲁亮,孟凤霞,等. 2006-2015年我国鼠类监测报告[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(6):517-522. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.06.001.
[5] 柳小青,刘仰青,陶卉英,等. 2011-2016年江西省南昌市鼠类种群变化情况分析[J]. 疾病监测,2018,33(2):155-158. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2018.02.010.
[6] 徐建敏,魏跃红,陈守义,等. 2003-2016年广州市鼠形动物种类及结构变化分析[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(2):188-191.
[7] 王桂安,马晓,徐荣,等. 2006-2016年浙江省宁波市鼠密度及其季节消长分析[J]. 疾病监测,2018,33(8):674-678. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2018.08.015.
[8] 陈树林,尹世强,刘伟,等. 鞍山市2013-2016年鼠类监测分析[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(3):272-274.
[9] 杨瑞,谭梁飞,熊进峰,等. 湖北省2015年病媒生物监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(5):492-495. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.05.023.
[10] 唐小兰,魏超,欧阳颐,等. 广西壮族自治区2016年2个国家级病媒生物监测点监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2018,29(4):383-387. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.04.016.
[11] 张家勇,丁俊,白玉银,等. 2006-2015年辽宁省鼠类密度季节消长趋势分析[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(2):149-153.
[12] 郭黄吉,冯丹,杨国军. 2015-2016年遵义市城区鼠密度监测分析[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(3):264-266.
[13] 陈华,刘平,黄铮铮,等. 绵阳市2016年鼠类种群及密度监测分析[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2017,23(6):564-565,568.
文章导航

/