论著

祁连山东缘高原鼢鼠对溴敌隆的敏感性与适口性测定实验

展开
  • 1 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室, 中美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2 甘肃省草原技术推广总站, 甘肃 兰州 730020;
    3 甘肃农业大学动物医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070
谭宇尘,女,在读硕士,从事生化与分子生物学研究,Email:sasuke421339218@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-04-21

  网络出版日期: 2019-10-20

基金资助

甘肃省农牧厅草原技术推广总站项目(GCB2015-01);甘肃省陇原青年创新创业人才项目(LQ20180916-2);甘肃农业大学"伏羲杰出人才"培育项目(Gaufx-02J03)

The determination study of Eospalax baileyi to bromadiolone and palatability of bromadiolone for E. baileyi in the eastern margin of the Qilian Mountains

Expand
  • 1 College of Grassland Science, Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem(Ministry of Education), Pratacultural Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province, Sino-U. S. Centers for Grazing Land Ecosystem Sustainability, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu Province, China;
    2 Garssland Technology Extension Station of Gansu Province;
    3 College of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University

Received date: 2019-04-21

  Online published: 2019-10-20

Supported by

Supported by the Grassland Technology Extension General Station Project of Gansu Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Department (No. GCB2015-01), Longyuan Youth Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents Project of Gansu Province (No. LQ20180916-2) and the Fuxi Talents Cultivation Project of Gansu Agricultural University (No. Gaufx-02J03)

摘要

目的 测定祁连山东缘高原鼢鼠对抗凝血杀鼠剂溴敌隆的敏感性与适口性水平,为野外采用溴敌隆鼠药防制高原鼢鼠提供科学依据。方法 于2018年7-8月,在祁连山东缘天祝地区采用捕鼠笼非损伤捕获活的高原鼢鼠,实验室环境下单鼠单笼饲养,采用无选择性摄食试验,连续喂食1、3、5和7 d 0.000 5%的溴敌隆毒饵,记录高原鼢鼠取食和死亡情况,使用SPSS 19.0软件Bliss计算机程序,拟合回归分析,计算半致死喂食期(LFP50),99%致死喂食期(LFP99)。采用成组设计资料的t检验,分析其敏感性与适口性。结果 高原鼢鼠毒饵取食量有下降趋势,不同性别高原鼢鼠对溴敌隆的敏感性差异无统计学意义(t=-1.232,P=0.329),其LFP50和LFP99的估计值分别为0.492和11.897 d;高原鼢鼠取食毒饵后,死亡高峰期出现在第6~9天。0.000 5%溴敌隆对高原鼢鼠的首遇适口性为0.66,再遇适口性为0.77,均达到良好摄食系数,实验室校正灭鼠率均达100%。结论 溴敌隆对祁连山东缘天祝地区高原鼢鼠的毒效高、适口性好,且无抗性发生,0.000 5%溴敌隆可有效防治该地区的高原鼢鼠。

本文引用格式

谭宇尘, 韩天虎, 许国成, 魏彦明, 蔡志远, 王缠, 姚宝辉, 郭怀亮, 苏军虎 . 祁连山东缘高原鼢鼠对溴敌隆的敏感性与适口性测定实验[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019 , 30(5) : 545 -549 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.05.015

Abstract

Objective To determine the sensitivity of Eospalax baileyi to bromadiolone (an anticoagulant rodenticide) and the palatability of bromadiolone for E. baileyi in the eastern margin of the Qilian Mountains, and to provide a scientific basis for prevention and control of E. baileyi in the field using bromadiolone as a rodenticide. Methods During July to August, 2018, non-invasive live cage trapping was used to capture E. baileyi in Tianzhu area in the eastern margin of the Qilian Mountains; the E. baileyi was then individually caged and fed in a laboratory environment. In a non-selective food intake test, 0.000 5% bromadiolone bait was continuously provided to the E. baileyi for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days, and food intake and death of the E. baileyi were recorded. Bliss calculating program in SPSS 19.0 software was used for regression analysis and fitting, and the half-lethal feeding period (LFP50) and the 99% lethal feeding period (LFP99) were calculated. The t-test for grouped data was applied to analyze the sensitivity and palatability. Results There was a decreasing trend in the food intake of E. baileyi, with no significant difference observed in the sensitivity of E. baileyi to bromadiolone between sexes (t=-1.232, P=0.329). The estimated values of LFP50 and LFP99 were 0.492 day and 11.897 days, respectively. The death peak of E. baileyi appeared on the sixth to the ninth day after intake of the poison bait. The first and second palatability of 0.000 5% bromadiolone for E. baileyi was 0.66 and 0.77, respectively, both of which showed a good food intake coefficient and a laboratory-corrected deratization rate of 100%. Conclusion Bromadiolone is highly toxic and palatable to the E. baileyi in Tianzhu area in the eastern margin of the Qilian Mountains with no resistance observed; therefore, 0.000 5% bromadiolone may be used to control E. baileyi effectively in this area.

参考文献

[1] 赵卫燕,张秀娟. 血液灌流联合维生素K1治疗急性溴敌隆、溴鼠灵中毒1例急救与护理[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(增刊4):275-276.
[2] 宋英,李宁,王大伟,等. 鼠类对抗凝血类灭鼠剂抗药性的遗传机制[J]. 中国科学:生命科学,2016,46(5):619-626.
[3] 刘阳,张韶华,梁焯南,等. 广东省深圳市2017年褐家鼠对抗凝血杀鼠剂抗药性研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2018,29(6):617-620. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018. 06.016.
[4] 曹煜,王宇,王大伟,等. 哈尔滨地区黑线姬鼠对溴敌隆的敏感性测定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2008,19(5):405-407. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2008.05.006.
[5] 王庭林,郭永旺,刘晓辉,等. 山西省中华鼢鼠发生危害现状[J]. 农业技术与装备,2015(7):51-53. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1673-887X.2015.07.019.
[6] 王克琴,郭发新. 世双鼠靶地芬诺·硫酸钡成品颗粒剂防治高原鼢鼠田间试验[J]. 现代农业科技,2018(19):140-141,146.
[7] 苏军虎,南志标,纪维红. 家畜放牧对草地啮齿动物影响的研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(11):136-148.
[8] 王俊超,程春河,张进华,等. 增效溴敌隆对几种害鼠的毒杀作用[J]. 植物保护,2012,38(5):174-178. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 0529-1542.2012.05.038.
[9] 唐俊伟,张明,马志贵. 3种药剂防治高原鼢鼠的药效研究[J]. 现代农业科技,2013(24):144,152. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1007-5739.2013.24.085.
[10] 刘鹃,徐勇,于雪岚,等. 内江市鼠类种群监测及控制研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2016,22(3):266-267,270.
[11] Greaves JH. Resistance to anticoagulants in rodents[J]. Pest Manag Sci,1971,2(6):276-279. DOI:10.1002/ps.2780020609.
[12] Pelz HJ,Rost S,Hünerberg M,et al. The genetic basis of resistance to anticoagulants in rodents[J]. Genetics,2005,170(4):1839-1847. DOI:10.1534/genetics.104.040360.
[13] Cowan PE,Gleeson DM,Howitt RL,et al. Vkorc1 sequencing suggests anticoagulant resistance in rats in New Zealand[J]. Pest Manag Sci,2017,73(1):262-266. DOI:10.1002/ps.4304.
[14] 刘正祥,高子厚,段兴德,等. 云南省野鼠鼠疫疫区处置中溴敌隆灭鼠效果评价[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2018,29(2):172-174. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.02.014.
[15] 陈骏飞,徐娜,金艳,等. 趁鲜清洗和干制后清洗对三七药材质量的影响[J]. 中国药学杂志,2017,52(14):1227-1233. DOI:10.11669/cpj.2017.14.007.
[16] 林伟松,林森馨,冯志勇,等. 不同浓度敌鼠钠盐毒饵的适口性及灭效研究[J]. 广东农业科学,2011,38(15):68-69. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.15.026.
[17] 冯刘栋,雍峰,仲四清,等. 苏中圩田地区褐家鼠对杀鼠灵的抗药性研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2015,21(5):472-473.
[18] 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1152-2006农药登记用杀鼠剂防治家栖鼠类药效试验方法及评价[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国农业部,2006.
[19] Drummond DC,Rennison BD. The detection of rodent resistance to anticoagulants[J]. Bull World Health Organ,1973,48(2):239-242.
[20] 陈蔚恩,李选云,钟柳青,等. 0.005%溴鼠灵饵剂的适口性及其现场灭鼠效果研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2016,22(3):239-241.
[21] 王文龙,林希刚. 0.005%大隆毒饵适口性和灭鼠效果观察[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2009,15(2):119-120.
[22] 黄金波,柳付明,潘孝猛,等. 模拟现场快速评价家栖鼠毒饵适口性的应用研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(5):505-507. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.05.027.
[23] 苏军虎,Ji WH,南志标,等. 鼢鼠亚科Mysopalacinae动物系统学研究现状与展望[J]. 动物学杂志,2015,50(4):649-658. DOI:10.13859/j.cjz.201504019.
[24] 刘晓辉. 我国杀鼠剂应用现状及发展趋势[J]. 植物保护,2018,44(5):85-90. DOI:10.16688/j.zwbh.2018304.
[25] Whisson DA,Salmon TP. Effect of the timing of applications and amount of 0.01% diphacinone consumed on mortality of California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi)[J]. Crop Prot,2002,21(10):885-889. DOI:10.1016/s0261-2194(02)00054-6.
[26] 石金泉. 灭鼠毒饵适口性效果观察[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2006,12(3):212-214. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2006. 03.018.
[27] Bentley EW. A review of anticoagulant rodenticides in current use[J]. Bull World Health Organ,1972,47(3):275-280.
[28] 王军建,杨宇林,陈念慈,等. 不同浓度敌鼠钠盐毒鼠效果比较[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1991,2(2):108-110.
[29] 曹煜,牛海峰,田治中,等. 布氏田鼠对溴敌隆的敏感性测定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2011,22(1):59-61.
[30] 陈越华,黄华南,王勇. 几种抗凝血杀鼠剂对东方田鼠的毒杀试验[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2007,18(4):267-268. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2007.04.002.
文章导航

/