调查研究

天津市2009-2016年动物致伤处置门诊暴露人群流行病学分析

展开
  • 天津市疾病预防控制中心传染病控制室传染病科, 天津 300011
刘怡芳,女,硕士,主管医师,主要从事传染病预防控制工作,Email:yifang_2007@hotmail.com

收稿日期: 2017-08-22

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-20

Epidemiological analysis of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Tianjin, China, 2009-2016

Expand
  • Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China

Received date: 2017-08-22

  Online published: 2017-12-20

摘要

目的 分析2009-2016年天津市85家动物致伤处置门诊暴露人群流行病学特征及暴露后处置情况,为狂犬病防控提供科学依据。方法 收集天津市动物致伤处置门诊报告的人群资料及狂犬病病例资料,采用Excel 2007软件进行数据录入,SPSS 22.0软件进行率的χ2检验及Mann-kendall趋势检验。结果 天津市2009-2016年累计接诊636 286人次,年平均暴露率为558.20/10万,不同年度暴露率差异有统计学意义(χ2=9 016.882,P=0.000),其中Ⅲ级伤口暴露率呈上升趋势(Z=2.230,P < 0.05)。暴露人群分布呈现明显季节性,5-8月累计暴露人数占全部暴露人数的43.50%。男性暴露率高于女性(χ2=223.512,P=0.000),0~14岁年龄组人群暴露率为117.13/10万,远高于其他年龄组。犬暴露占82.28%,70.67%的伤口为Ⅱ级暴露,52.35%的暴露部位为上肢。门诊伤口处置率为86.60%。疫苗接种率为99.80%,Ⅲ级暴露人群被动免疫制剂接种率有上升趋势(Z=2.969,P < 0.05),但总体接种率仅为31.48%。结论 应依托规范化动物致伤门诊建设进一步规范门诊处置,同时加强狂犬病防治宣传,特别是针对重点地区重点人群进行健康教育。

本文引用格式

刘怡芳, 吕杰, 苏承 . 天津市2009-2016年动物致伤处置门诊暴露人群流行病学分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2017 , 28(6) : 589 -591 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.06.018

Abstract

Objective To provide evidence for rabies control and prevention by investigating the epidemiological characteristics of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Tianjin, China, from 2009-2016. Methods The data of 85 rabies post-exposure prophylaxis and human rabies cases were collected. Excel 2007 was used for data entry and SPSS 22.0 for Chi-square test and Mann-Kendall test. Results A total of 636 286 cases were reported with an average of 558.20/100 000 during 2009-2016 in Tianjin. The difference among annual exposure rate was statistically significant (χ2=9 016.882, P=0.000). The exposure rate of degree Ⅱ wound showed an upward trend (Z=2.230, P<0.05). The number of incidents from May to August constituted 43.50% of all the incidents. The exposure rate was higher in males (χ2=223.512, P=0.000). The exposure rate in 0-14 years of age was 117.13/100 000, the highest rate during all age groups. Dog bites constituted 82.28% of all exposures. The number of person with degree Ⅱ exposure accounted for 70.67%, 52.35% of the wounds were on the upper limb. Clinical wound cleaning constituted 86.60% of the wounds and 99.80% of the exposed persons were inoculated with rabies vaccines. The inoculation rate of passive immunizing agents showed an upward trend but only 31.48% of persons with degree Ⅲ exposure was given. Conclusion We should standardize the outpatient treatment relying on the establishment of post-exposure prophylaxis clinics. The health education and intervention should be strengthened.

参考文献

[1] Hampson K, Coudeville L, Lembo T,et al. Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2015, 9(5):e0003709.
[2] Yao HW,Yang Y,Liu K,et al. The spatiotemporal expansion of human rabies and its probable explanation in mainland China, 2004-2013[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2015, 9(2):e0003502.
[3] Sabeta CT,Mansfield KL,McElhinney LM,et al. Molecular epidemiology of rabies in bat-eared foxes(Otocyon megalotis)in South Africa[J]. Virus Res, 2007, 129(1):1-10.
[4] MacInnes CD, Smith SM, Tinline RR, et al. Elimination of rabies from red foxes in eastern Ontario[J]. J Wildlife Dis, 2001, 7(1):119-132.
[5] Yin CP,Zhou H,Wu H,et al. Analysis on factors related to rabies epidemic in China from 2007-2011[J]. Virol Sin, 2012, 27(2):132-143.
[6] 茅蓉,曹家穗,金安宝. 2009-2014年浙江省嘉兴市疾病预防控制中心犬伤门诊狂犬病暴露人群监测分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2015, 30(10):851-854.
[7] 邱波,梁纪伟,辛化雷,等. 青岛市2009-2013年狂犬病暴露处置监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2014, 25(6):563-565.
[8] 马奎. 湖北省疾控中心2013年犬伤门诊病例流行病学分析[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2015, 26(1):96-97.
[9] Wilde H,Glueck R,Khawplod P,et al. Efficacy study of a new albumin-free human diploid cell rabies vaccine(Lyssavac-HDC, Berna) in 100 severely rabies-exposed Thai patients[J]. Vaccine, 1995, 13(6):593-596.
[10] 毛伟成,蓝荣伟,蒙南新,等. 狂犬病流行与防治研究进展[J]. 医学动物防制, 2015, 31(3):283-286.
文章导航

/