论著

嗜吞噬细胞无形体在不同组织细胞间抗原差异研究

展开
  • 1 河套学院医学系, 内蒙古 巴彦淖尔 015000;
    2 巴彦淖尔市疾病预防控制中心, 内蒙古 巴彦淖尔 015000
高娃,女,蒙古族,博士,讲师,主要从事蜱媒人兽共患疾病研究,Email:melody_gaowa@yahoo.com

收稿日期: 2016-12-29

  网络出版日期: 2017-06-20

基金资助

巴彦淖尔市科技计划;河套学院引进人才科研启动基金

Analysis of antigenic diversity of Anaplasma phagocytophilum grown in different cells

Expand
  • 1 Department of Medicine, Hetao College, Bayannur 015000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China;
    2 Byannur Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Received date: 2016-12-29

  Online published: 2017-06-20

Supported by

Supported by the Science and Technology Project of Bayannur, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Scientific Research Foundation for Introduced Talents, Hetao College, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

摘要

目的 调查嗜吞噬细胞无形体在不同组织细胞间产生抗原差异的原因。方法 采用RT PCR法对嗜吞噬细胞无形体在不同组织细胞中的抗原蛋白表达差异进行分析,并利用真核无细胞蛋白表达系统合成重组蛋白,利用蛋白质印迹法进行测试。结果 组织培养细胞不同,嗜吞噬细胞无形体菌体表面可产生不同的P44外膜蛋白。通过检测发现,3种rP44蛋白易与患者血清中抗体结合,可作为人粒细胞无形体病的诊断用抗原。结论 不同组织细胞间存在抗原性差异的不同嗜吞噬细胞无形体。

本文引用格式

高娃, 殷旭红, 郭生春, 乌兰图雅, 曹民治 . 嗜吞噬细胞无形体在不同组织细胞间抗原差异研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2017 , 28(3) : 255 -257 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.03.015

Abstract

Objective To analyze the reasons for antigen diversity of Anaplasma phagocytophilum grown in different cells. Methods The P44 transcripts were analyzed using nested RT-PCR, and the P44 proteins were produced as recombinant protein in vitro by insect cell-free protein synthesis system. Results We detected and characterized P44 transcript variants of A. phagocytophilum from THP-1 and HL60 cells. And our study demonstrated the presence of specific antibodies against the 3 type of rP44 proteins that prevailed in infected THP-1 and HL60 cells, probably being suitable as protein antigens for sero-diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Conclusion We demonstrated antigenic diversity of a variety of A. phagocytophilum grown in different cells.

参考文献

[1] Chen SM,Dumler JS,Bakken JS,et al. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1994, 32(3):589-595.
[2] Zhang LJ,Liu Y,Ni DX,et al. Nosocomial transmission of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in China[J]. JAMA, 2008, 300(19):2263-2270.
[3] Lin MQ, Kikuchi T, Brewer HM, et al. Global proteomic analysis of two tick-borne emerging zoonotic agents:Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis[J]. Front Microbiol, 2011, 2:24.
[4] Dunning Hotopp JC,Lin MQ,Madupu R,et al. Comparative genomics of emerging human ehrlichiosis agents[J]. PLoS Genet, 2006, 2(2):e21.
[5] Lin Q, Rikihisa Y,Ohashi N,et al. Mechanisms of variable p44 expression by Anaplasma phagocytophilum[J]. Infect Immun, 2003, 71(10):5650-5661.
[6] Ohashi N, Gaowa, Wuritu, et al. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis, Japan[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2013, 19(2):289-292.
[7] Jiao XY,Fan ZC,Li YZ,et al. Clinical and laboratory features parameters of human granulocytic anaplasmosis(HGA) in patients admitted to hospital in Guangdong province, China[J]. Trop Doct, 2015, 45(4):209-213.
[8] Wang Y,Chen CF,Zhang LJ. Molecular characterization of Msp2/P44 of Anaplasma phagocytophilum isolated from infected patients and Haemaphysalis longicornis in Laizhou Bay, Shandong province, China[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10):e78189.
[9] Hao Q, Geng Z, Hou XX, et al. Seroepidemiological investigation of lyme disease and human granulocytic anaplasmosis among people living in forest areas of eight provinces in China[J]. Biomed Environ Sci, 2013, 26(3):185-189.
[10] Rikihisa Y. Mechanisms of obligatory intracellular infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2011, 24(3):469-489.
文章导航

/