收稿日期: 2016-06-24
网络出版日期: 2016-12-20
基金资助
住房和城乡建设部2014年科学技术项目计划(2014-k6-002)
Attraction and feeding response of Reticulitermes chinensis to baits supplemented with Masson pine pollen and Zea pollinium
Received date: 2016-06-24
Online published: 2016-12-20
Supported by
Supported by the 2014 Science and Technology Project Plan, Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development (No. 2014-k6-002)
目的 了解松花粉和玉米蜂花粉作为饵料添加剂对黑胸散白蚁的诱食作用。方法 以松木粉为基础饵料,添加不同浓度的松花粉和玉米蜂花粉,每种花粉设6个浓度(5%、10%、15%、20%、25%和30%)处理。利用四臂嗅觉仪测定2015年5月采集的黑胸散白蚁对各处理的嗅觉反应,并测定其连续10 d的取食量。结果 黑胸散白蚁对含15%和25%松花粉的饵料具有负趋向性,对其他浓度松花粉的饵料具有正趋向性;对含20%、25%和30%玉米蜂花粉的饵料具有负趋向性,对含5%、10%和15%玉米蜂花粉的饵料具有正趋向性。黑胸散白蚁对含松花粉饵料的取食量(5~24 mg)均小于对照组(52~54 mg);对含5%、10%、15%、20%和25%玉米蜂花粉饵料的取食量(15~43 mg)与对照组(11~57 mg)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而对含30%玉米蜂花粉饵料的取食量(108 mg)大于对照组(12 mg)。结论 黑胸散白蚁对含20%松花粉和含15%玉米蜂花粉的饵料具有较好的趋向性;不喜食含松花粉的饵料,较喜食含玉米蜂花粉的饵料;随着玉米蜂花粉浓度的提高,取食量逐渐增加。黑胸散白蚁对饵料的嗅觉反应与取食量无相关性。
朱方丽, 王顺庚, 陈建, 吉伟 . 松花粉和玉米蜂花粉对黑胸散白蚁诱食作用研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2016 , 27(6) : 566 -569 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.06.010
Objective To examine the effect of Masson pine pollen and Zea pollinium as food attractant to Reticulitermes chinensis. Methods The treatments were designed with Masson pine pollen, and Zea pollinium at 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%. The olfactory response and selectivity of R. chinensis were determined with a four-arm olfactometer, and food consumption of during 10 d was measured. Results The results showed that 15% and 25% Masson pine pollen, and 5%, 10%, and 15% Zea pollinium had a repellency to R. chinensis, but other concentrations with an attractant effect; food consumption of R. chinensis to untreated control(52-54 mg)was significantly more than the baits containing Masson pine pollen(5-24 mg); between untreated control(11-57 mg)and 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% Zea pollinium(15-43 mg), there was no significant difference,but significant at 30% Zea pollinium(108 mg)obviously more than to control check (12 mg). Conclusion 20% Masson pine pollen and 15% Zea pollinium were attractive to R. chinensis. Termite didn't like food containing Masson pine pollen, but preferred food containing Zea pollinium and food consumption gradually increased with concentration increasing. Therefore, researchers suggested that olfactory response and food consumption had no correspondence, and should research and analyze separately.
[1] 李桂祥. 中国白蚁及其防治[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2002:165-166.
[2] 黄蔚蓉. 房屋散白蚁防治技术的研究[J]. 安徽建筑, 2004, 11(5):114, 116.
[3] 林雁,张睿,何利文. 6种白蚁防治药物对散白蚁的室内毒力比较[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械, 2010, 16(1):30-34.
[4] 刘晓燕,苗静,安玉兴,等. 植物质防白蚁剂开发与应用前景[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2012(4):50-53.
[5] 韩彤彤,葛琴雅,成倩. 白蚁对古代建筑的危害及防治方法研究现状[J]. 文物保护与考古科学, 2014, 26(3):110-116.
[6] 邓志坚. 白蚁毒饵诱杀技术研究进展[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2006, 15(4):315-320.
[7] Saran RK, Millar JG, Rust MK. Role of(3Z,6Z,8E)-dodecatrien-1-ol in trail following,feeding,and mating behavior of Reticulitermes hesperus[J]. J Chem Ecol,2007,33(2):369-389.
[8] 程冬保. 白蚁信息素研究进展[J]. 昆虫学报, 2013, 56(4):419-426.
[9] 黄求应,薛东,雷朝亮. 白蚁诱食信息素研究进展[J]. 昆虫学报, 2005, 48(4):616-621.
[10] Raina AK,Bland JM,Osbrink W. Hydroquinone is not a phagostimulant for the Formosan subterranean termite[J]. J Chem Ecol, 2005, 31(3):509-517.
[11] 刘吉敏,韦戈,黄其椿,等. 白蚁诱饵的研究现状与前景展望[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(24):14666-14667, 14670.
[12] 丁芳,嵇保中,刘曙雯,等. 白蚁的食物选择[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(2):166-173.
[13] 林爱寿,冯亮和,胡允岳,等. 台湾乳白蚁和黄胸散白蚁对不同糖的趋性研究[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2011, 30(3):10-12.
[14] Castillo VP, Sajap AS, Sahri MH. Feeding response of subterranean termites Coptotermes curvignathus and Coptotermes gestroi(Blattodea:Rhinotermitidae)to baits supplemented with sugars,amino acids,and cassava[J]. J Econ Entomol, 2013, 106(4):1794-1801.
[15] Gautam BK,Henderson G. Effects of m-tyrosine on feeding and survival of Formosan subterranean termites (Isoptera:Rhinotermitidae)[J]. Ann Entomol Soc Am, 2008, 101(6):1088-1093.
[16] 黄求应,雷朝亮,薛东. 黑翅土白蚁的食物选择性研究[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(5):91-95.
[17] 梁小松,刘勇,张绍红,等. 两种乳白蚁对几种物质的嗅觉反应及触角电位测定[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 31(2):55-58.
[18] 丁红建,郭予元,吴才宏. 用于昆虫嗅觉行为研究的四臂嗅觉仪的设计、制作和应用[J]. 昆虫知识, 1996, 33(4):241-243.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |