收稿日期: 2015-10-26
网络出版日期: 2016-04-20
基金资助
国家重大科学研究计划(2012CB955504);国家自然科学基金(81273139)
Relationship between mosquito density and land cover types in Guangzhou, China
Received date: 2015-10-26
Online published: 2016-04-20
Supported by
Supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program)(No. 2012CB955504) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81273139)
目的 探索蚊虫密度与土地覆盖类型之间的关系。方法 采用广州市2014年9月1-30日期间的蚊虫调查数据,用遥感和地理信息系统技术提取广州市街道的土地覆盖因子;采用流行病学统计分析蚊虫密度与土地覆盖类型之间的关系;比较街道蚊虫密度空间分布差异。结果 布雷图指数(BI)>20的街道水浇地、水体和被水淹没或浸湿植被的覆盖比率取值范围分别为1.4%~35.7%、0.1%~23.1%和0~3.4%,而BI≤5的街道水浇地、水体和被水淹没或浸湿植被的覆盖比率取值范围分别为0~0.7%、0~5.1%和0,总体而言,BI>20的街道水浇地、水体和被水淹没或浸湿植被的覆盖比率要高于BI≤5的街道。与邻近的BI≤5的街道比较,BI>20的街道水浇地、水体、耕地和植被的覆盖比率高,旱地的覆盖比率低。结论 蚊虫密度与水浇地、水体和被水淹没或浸湿植被密切相关。
岳玉娟, 鲁亮, 刘起勇 . 广州市蚊虫密度与土地覆盖类型关系研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2016 , 27(2) : 99 -102 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.02.002
Objective To explore the relationships between mosquito density and land cover types. Methods Mosquito data in Guangzhou city were extracted from 1st-30th September 2014. Land cover types in towns of Guangzhou city were extracted based on geographical information system and remote sensing. The relationships between mosquito density and land cover types were explored based on epidemiological statistical method. The differences of mosquito density among towns were explored. Results Coverage ratios of irrigated croplands, water bodies and closed to open (>15%) grassland or woody vegetation on regularly flooded or waterlogged soil-fresh, brackish or saline water in towns with Breteau index (BI)>20, were 1.4%-35.7%, 0.1%-23.1% and 0-3.4%, respectively. These coverage ratios were higher than those in towns with BI≤5, amounting to 0-0.7%, 0-5.1% and 0, for the coverage types described previously. Compared with land cover types in adjacent towns with BI≤5, coverage ratios of irrigated croplands, water bodies and cropland/vegetation were higher and coverage ratio of rainfed croplands was even higher in towns with BI>20. Conclusion Mosquito density was closely related to irrigated croplands, water bodies and closed to open (>15%) grassland or woody vegetation on regularly flooded or waterlogged soil-Fresh, brackish or saline water.
Key words: Mosquito density; Breteau index; Land cover; Spatial relationship
[1] 杨佩英,秦鄂德. 登革热和登革出血热:基础理论与实验技术[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,1999:10-20.
[2] 孔繁吉,王华,宋华,等. 曲阜孔林伊蚊调查研究及防制[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2001,12(3):195-196.
[3] 郑重,张桂林,刘斌,等. 新疆北湾地区刺扰伊蚊孳生地调查[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2008,14(4):270-271.
[4] 林新武,康素萍,赖天然,等. 莆田口岸登革热流行风险分析[J]. 口岸卫生控制,2014,19(3):33-37.
[5] 桑少伟. 中国登革热溯源、预警模型及决策支持系统框架建立[D]. 北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2015.
[6] 王成岗. 广东省登革流行特征及气象因素对广州市登革热的影响研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2014.
[7] Cianci D,Hartemink N,Zeimes CB,et al. High resolution spatial analysis of habitat preference of Aedes albopictus (Diptera:Culicidae)in an urban environment[J]. J Med Entomol,2015, 52(3):329-335.
[8] Midekisa A, Senay GB, Wimberly MC. Multisensor earth observations to characterize wetlands and malaria epidemiology in Ethiopia[J]. Water Res Res,2014,50(11):8791-8806.
[9] Acheson ES, Plowright AA, Kerr JT. Where have all the mosquito nets gone? Spatial modelling reveals mosquito net distributions across Tanzania do not target optimal Anopheles mosquito habitats[J]. Malaria J,2015,14(1):322.
[10] Obsomer V,Dufrene M,Defourny P,et al. Anopheles species associations in Southeast Asia:indicator species and environmental influences[J]. Parasit Vect,2013,6(1):136-149.
[11] 樊景春,刘起勇. 气候变化对登革热传播媒介影响研究进展[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2013,34(7):745-749.
[12] 易彬樘,张治英,徐德忠,等. 广东省登革热流行与气候因素变化的相关性[J]. 第四军医大学学报,2003,24(2):143-146.
[13] 易彬樘,张治英,徐德忠,等. 气候因素对登革热媒介伊蚊密度影响的研究[J]. 中国公共卫生,2003,19(2):129-131.
[14] 江毅民,严子锵,胡志刚,等. 气候因素用于白纹伊蚊密度预测的探索[J]. 热带医学杂志,2014,14(2):235-237.
[15] 卫生部疾病预防控制局. 登革热防治手册[M]. 2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:74-84,97-98.
[16] 牛振国,单玉秀,张海英. 全球土地覆盖GlobCover2009数据中的中国区域湿地数据精度评价[J]. 湿地科学,2012,10(4):389-395.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |