3种剂型高效氯氟氰菊酯对白纹伊蚊现场防制效果研究

doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2021.01.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探索不同剂型高效氯氟氰菊酯和施药方式对白纹伊蚊的防制效果。方法 2019年8－10月在苏州市虎丘区选择4个相对独立的苗圃种植基地，分别使用静电和非静电低容量喷雾器在白纹伊蚊栖息的植被上喷洒高效氯氟氰菊酯微囊悬浮剂、可湿性粉剂和悬浮剂；分别在喷洒前1周和喷洒后连续6周内采用人诱停落法监测白纹伊蚊密度变化，同时每周每块试验样地采集植被叶片约200 g，采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术（GC-MS）监测喷洒后植被叶面药物残留量变化。采用SPSS 16.0软件对数据进行统计分析，率的比较采用χ²检验，计量资料采用t 检验或方差分析。结果与对照组相比，白纹伊蚊密度在各试验组进行绿篱药物喷洒后，高效氯氟氰菊酯微囊悬浮剂可连续4～5周保持密度下降率>70.0%；悬浮剂可在2周内保持密度下降率>70.0%；可湿性粉剂仅能1周保持密度下降率>70.0%。微囊悬浮剂药物残留量在喷药后4周内维持在7.2～9.3 mg/kg之间，微囊悬浮剂静电喷雾1周后的药物残留量显著高于非静电喷雾，约为非静电喷雾的1.7倍，其持效期也长于非静电喷雾。结论绿篱施药技术可有效控制外环境白纹伊蚊密度，微胶囊悬浮剂防制白纹伊蚊效果明显优于可湿性粉剂和悬浮剂，持效时间可达4～5周；静电喷雾方式可显著提高植被药物沉积量，增强防制效果。

关键词: 绿篱技术, 高效氯氟氰菊酯, 白纹伊蚊, 效果评价

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of different formulations and application methods of lambda-cyhalothrin in the control of Aedes albopictus in the field. Methods From August to October, 2019, relatively independent nursery gardens were selected in Huqiu district of Suzhou, and electrostatic and non-electrostatic sprayers were used to spray lambda-cyhalothrin in the forms of microcapsule suspension, wettable powder, and suspension on the vegetation with Ae. albopictus. At 1 week before spraying and within 6 consecutive weeks after spraying, the human-baited landing method was used to monitor the density of Ae. albopictus; at the same time, about 200 grams of leaves were collected per experimental plot every week, and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy was used to monitor the change in drug residue on leaves after spraying. SPSS 16.0 software was used for statistical analysis of data; the chi-square test was used for comparison of rates, and the t-test or an analysis of variance was used for comparison of continuous data. Results Compared with the control group, the experimental groups achieved a reduction rate of >70.0% in Ae. albopictus density for 4-5 consecutive weeks after the spraying of lambda-cyhalothrin microcapsule suspension on hedgerow; the suspension achieved a reduction rate of >70.0% in Ae. albopictus density for 2 weeks, while the wettable powder achieved a reduction rate of >70.0% for only 1 week. The residue of microcapsule suspension remained between 7.2 mg/kg and 9.3 mg/kg within 4 weeks after spraying; at 1 week after spraying, the residue of microcapsule suspension with electrostatic sprayer was about 1.7 times that with non-electrostatic sprayer, and microcapsule suspension with electrostatic sprayer had a longer effective duration than that with non-electrostatic sprayer. Conclusion Pesticide application on hedgerow can effectively control the density of Ae. albopictus in the external environment. Microcapsule suspension has a significantly better control effect on Ae. albopictus than wettable powder and suspension, with an effective duration of 4-5 weeks. Electrostatic spraying can significantly improve the amount of drug residue on vegetation and thus enhance the control effect on Ae. albopictus.

Key words: Hedgerow technique, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Aedes albopictus, Effect evaluation

中图分类号:

顾灯安, 孙爱娟, 马晓艳, 陈学良. 3种剂型高效氯氟氰菊酯对白纹伊蚊现场防制效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(1): 107-110.

GU Deng-an, SUN Ai-juan, MA Xiao-yan, CHEN Xue-liang. Field evaluation of three formulations of lambda-cyhalothrin in the control of Aedes albopictus[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2021, 32(1): 107-110.

参考文献

[1] Li CX,Wang ZM,Dong YD,et al. Evaluation of lambda-cyhalothrin barrier spray on vegetation for control of Aedes albopictus in China[J]. J Am Mosq Control Assoc,2010,26(3):346-348. DOI:10.2987/10-6007.1.
[2] 邓惠,赵晓明,陈锡炎,等. 应用人工模拟绿篱现场筛选绿篱技术使用药物[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(2):170-172. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.02.019.Deng H,Zhao XM,Chen XY,et al. Application of artificial simulation in insecticide screening for barrier spray on vegetation[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2017,28(2):170-172. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.02.019.
[3] 周小洁,张勇,阎婷,等. 绿篱滞留喷洒对蚊虫防制效果的初步研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2019,30(6):653-656. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.06.013.Zhou XJ,Zhang Y,Yan T,et al. A preliminary study on the effect of residual spraying on hedgerow in preventing and controlling mosquitoes[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2019,30(6):653-656. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.06.013.
[4] Maski D,Durairaj D. Effects of electrode voltage,liquid flow rate,and liquid properties on spray chargeability of an air-assisted electrostatic-induction spray-charging system[J]. J Electrostat,2010,68(2):152-158. DOI:10.1016/j.elstat.2009.12.001.
[5] 任立瑞,陈福良,尹明明. 静电喷雾技术理论与应用研究进展[J]. 现代农药,2019,18(1):1-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-5284.2019.01.001.Ren LR,Chen FL,Yin MM. Progress in theory and application on electrostatic spraying technology[J]. Mod Agrochem,2019,18(1):1-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-5284.2019.01.001.
[6] 张少杰,孙轩,高胜松,等. 静电喷雾在农药植保领域的应用与现状分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2019,47(17):15-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2019.17.005.Zhang SJ,Sun X,Gao SS,et al. Application and status quo of electrostatic spray in pesticide plant protection[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci,2019,47(17):15-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611. 2019.17.005.
[7] 王飞,陆珏磊,蒋璐,等. 绿篱施药技术现场控制白纹伊蚊的效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2016,27(6):555-557. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.06.007.Wang F,Lu JL,Jiang L,et al. Field evaluation of insecticidal barrier spray on vegetation for the control of Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2016,27(6):555-557. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.06.007.
[8] 黎祖秋,屈志强,汤洪洋,等. 5种卫生杀虫剂对登革热媒介伊蚊现场控制效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2018,29(6):598-600. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.06.011.Li ZQ,Qu ZQ,Tang HY,et al. Field control efficacy of Aedes vectors of dengue fever with five public health insecticides[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2018,29(6):598-600. DOI:10. 11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.06.011.
[9] 刘旭振,倪秀锋,吴军,等. 绿篱技术应用于登革热蚊媒控制的现场试验研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(2):152-156. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.02.014.Liu XZ,Ni XF,Wu J,et al. The field test for insecticidal barrier spray on vegetation to control dengue mosquito vectors[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2017,28(2):152-156. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.02.014.
[10] 钱薇萍,胡雅劼,李观翠,等. 绿篱技术对白纹伊蚊的现场防治效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2018,29(4):361-363. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.04.010.Qian WP,Hu YJ,Li GC,et al. Field control effect of vegetation barrier treatment on Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2018,29(4):361-363. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003. 8280.2018.04.010.
[11] Trout RT,Brown GC,Potter MF,et al. Efficacy of two pyrethroid insecticides applied as barrier treatments for managing mosquito (Diptera:Culicidae) populations in suburban residential properties[J]. J Med Entomol,2007,44(3):470-477. DOI:10. 1093/jmedent/44.3.470
[12] 袁慧娟,宋国新,胡耀铭. GC/MS技术在蔬菜农残快速检测中的应用[J]. 现代科学仪器,2006,16(3):68-69.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-8892.2006.03.020.Yuan HJ,Song GX,Hu YM.Determination of pesticide residues in vegetables by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J].ModSci Instruments,2006,16(3):68-69. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-8892.2006.03.020.

[1]	孙钦同, 韩英男, 刘言, 王学军, 刘峰, 赖世宏, 景晓. 山东省登革热媒介白纹伊蚊生态学调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 16-20.
[2]	李天奇, 刘钦梅, 吴瑜燕, 罗明宇, 王金娜, 龚震宇. 浙江省登革热重点地区2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊种群密度监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 21-24.
[3]	魏超, 马海芳, 廖宁, 熊绮梦. 广西壮族自治区2020－2021年登革热媒介伊蚊密度专项调查结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 25-29.
[4]	赵春春, 周欣欣, 李文玉, 伦辛畅, 刘小波, 吴海霞, 王君, 刘起勇, 孟凤霞. 2020年中国13省份登革热媒介白纹伊蚊抗药性监测及分析研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 30-37.
[5]	郑宇婷, 杨春梅, 杨明东, 姜进勇. 云南边境地区登革热媒介伊蚊生态学及抗药性监测[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 38-43.
[6]	涂涛田, 肖汉森, 孟凤霞, 刘起勇, 刘小波, 何亚明, 季恒青. 重庆市2019年登革热暴发疫情应急控制后媒介伊蚊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 44-47.
[7]	周欣欣, 李芬, 段文波, 马欣然, 宋秀平, 吴少英, 孟凤霞. 白纹伊蚊电压门控钠离子通道基因克隆及其生物信息学分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 672-679.
[8]	薛海滨, 孟金霞, 任乐, 景晓. 山东省临沂市2018－2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊监测与风险评估[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 686-690.
[9]	张育富, 张守刚, 朱丁, 顾灯安, 葛小伍, 袁建明, 崔倩, 褚宏亮. 江苏省多层住宅居民区不同楼层白纹伊蚊分布调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 700-704.
[10]	周毅彬, 朱奕奕, 朱伟, 姚隽一, 朱江, 冷培恩, 吴寰宇. 诱蚊诱卵器监测的空间抽样方法研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 749-755.
[11]	朱伟, 刘翔宇, 周毅彬. 绿篱喷洒控制白纹伊蚊密度的时空变化研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 772-778.
[12]	郭秀霞, 程鹏, 刘丽娟, 王海防, 张崇星, 王怀位, 公茂庆. 白纹伊蚊紫外光敏感视蛋白基因的克隆及序列特征[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 553-559.
[13]	张家林, 黄发源. 安徽省2015－2019年登革热媒介伊蚊监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 582-585.
[14]	邓惠, 刘礼平, 许齐爱, 廉战民, 段金花, 陈宗晶, 芦瑞鹏, 沈秀婷, 阴伟雄, 吴军, 林立丰. 3种蚊虫引诱剂与不同流量CO₂对白纹伊蚊诱集效果的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 637-641.
[15]	陈秋梅, 王热勤, 吴海霞, 张涛, 马燕东, 颉东岗, 管斌. 甘肃省天水市2017－2020年两种重要媒介蚊虫监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(4): 456-460.