Abstract：Objective To investigate the mosquito-trapping effect of photocatalysis mosquito lamp versus BG-trap mosquito lamp, and to provide a more effective method for the surveillance of dengue vector Aedes. Methods From August to September in 2019, one site each was selected from the four types of habitats of urban residential area, farm house, tire factory, and salvage station as the surveillance sites in Daiyue district of Tai'an in Shandong province, China, and photocatalysis mosquito lamp and BG-trap mosquito lamp were set up at the same time, with a distance of 100 m between the two types of mosquito lamps. Power supply was turned on at 15:00, and the lamps were collected at 09:00 on the next day. Surveillance was performed once in the first, middle, and last ten days of each month, and the mosquitoes were taken back to the laboratory and were frozen and sacrificed for taxonomic identification and counting. Excel 2010 and SPSS16.0 softwares were used for statistical analysis, and the χ2 test was used for the comparison of composition ratio (rate). Results The dominant mosquito species were Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens pallens in Tai'an. A total of 212 female mosquitoes were captured by photocatalysis mosquito lamp, mainly Cx. pipiens pallens (49.53%), and a total of 1 005 female mosquitoes were captured by BG-trap mosquito lamp, mainly Ae. albopictus (55.32%). There were significant differences in the trapping rates of different mosquito species between the two types of mosquito traps (all P<0.05); the BG-trap mosquito lamp had significantly higher trapping rates of Ae. albopictus and Armigeres subalbatus than the photocatalysis mosquito lamp, while the photocatalysis mosquito lamp had significantly higher trapping rates of Cx. pipiens pallens, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, and Anopheles sinensis than the BG-trap mosquito lamp. The highest number of mosquitoes were captured in the tire factory, with the dominant species of Ae. albopictus (65.22%), followed by the farm house, with the dominant species of Cx. pipiens pallens (47.40%). There were significant differences in the trapping rates of Cx. pipiens pallens, Ae. Albopictus, and Ar. subalbatus between different habitats (all P<0.05). For the tire factory, the mosquitoes trapped by BG-trap mosquito lamp accounted for 65.90% of all mosquitoes, mainly Ae. albopictus (89.37%); for the farm house, there were significant differences in the trapping rates of Ae. albopictus, Ar. subalbatus, and An. sinensis between the two types of mosquito traps (all P<0.05), and compared with the photocatalysis mosquito lamp, the BG-trap mosquito lamp had higher trapping rates of Ae. albopictus (17.48% vs 2.74%) and Ar. subalbatus (12.59% vs 2.74%) and a lower trapping rate of An. sinensis (20.28% vs 42.47%). Conclusion BG-trap mosquito lamp has a relatively good trapping effect on Ae. albopictus, and it is recommended to be used in the surveillance of dengue vector Aedes and the investigation of breeding sites.
马德珍, 明明, 陆华. 光催化诱蚊灯与BG-trap捕蚊器诱蚊效果比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(6): 685-689.
MA De-zhen, MING Ming, LU Hua. Mosquito-trapping effect of photocatalysis mosquito lamp versus BG-trap mosquito lamp. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2020, 31(6): 685-689.
[1] 刘华,曲建强,王学军,等. 2种监测方法在登革热媒介监测中的应用效果评价[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(3):243-246. Liu H,Qu JQ,Wang XJ,et al. Evaluation of the application effect of two monitoring methods in dengue media monitoring[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2018,24(3):243-246. [2] 中华人民共和国卫生部. GB/T 23797-2009病媒生物密度监测方法蚊虫[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2009. Ministry of Health of People's Republic of China. GB/T 23797-2009 Surveillance methods for vector density-Mosquito[S]. Beijing:China Standard Press,2009. [3] Kröckel U,Rose A,Eiras áE,et al. New tools for surveillance of adult yellow fever mosquitoes:comparison of trap catches with human landing rates in an urban environment[J]. J Am Mosq Control Assoc,2006,22(2):229-238. DOI:10.2987/8756-971X (2006)22[229:NTFSOA]2.0.CO;2. [4] Gama RA,da Silva IM,Eiras M,et al. Development of the BG-Malaria trap as an alternative to human-landing catches for the capture of Anopheles darlingi[J]. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz,2013,108(6):763-771. DOI:10.1590/0074-0276108062013013. [5] Tangena JAA,Thammavong P,Hiscox A,et al. The human-baited double net trap:an alternative to human landing catches for collecting outdoor biting mosquitoes in Lao PDR[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(9):e0138735. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0138735. [6] 王佳璐,谭梁飞. 白纹伊蚊的饲养技巧及其卵巢的解剖方法[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2011,22(4):366-367. Wang JL,Tan LF. Aedes albopictus rearing and ovarian dissection methods[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2011,22(4):366-367. [7] 杨绍基,任红. 传染病学[M]. 7版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:92-93. Yang SJ,Ren H. Infectious diseases[M]. 7th ed. Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House,2008:92-93. [8] 郑学礼. 我国蚊媒研究概况[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志,2014,9(2):183-187. DOI:10.13350/j.cjpb.140222. Zheng XL. Advances in research on mosquitoes in China[J]. J Pathog Biol,2014,9(2):183-187. DOI:10.13350/j.cjpb.140222. [9] Waldock J,Chandra NL,Lelieveld J,et al. The role of environmental variables on Aedes albopictus biology and chikungunya epidemiology[J]. Pathog Glob Health,2013,107(5):224-241. DOI:10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000100. [10] Armbruster PA. Photoperiodic diapause and the establishment of Aedes albopictus (Diptera:Culicidae) in North America[J]. J Med Entomol,2016,53(5):1013-1023. DOI:10.1093/jme/tjw037. [11] Li YJ,Su XH,Zhou GF,et al. Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of the BG-Sentinel trap,CDC light trap and Mosquito-oviposition trap for the surveillance of vector mosquitoes[J]. Parasit Vectors,2016,9:446. DOI:10.1186/s13071-016-1724-x. [12] 刘彬彬,王家豪,位广帅,等. 诱蚊诱卵器与BGS-trap捕蚊器应用效果研究[J]. 河南大学学报:医学版,2018,37(4):254-256,264. Liu BB,Wang JH,Wei GS,et al. Study on the efficiency between ovitrap and BG-Sentinel trap[J]. J Henan Univ:Med Ed,2018, 37(4):254-256,264. [13] 韦凌娅,孔庆鑫,王慧敏. 双层叠帐法与BG-trap诱捕器法在登革热应急蚊媒监测中的捕蚊效果比较[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2019,30(1):65-68. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.01.014. Wei LY,Kong QX,Wang HM. Effectiveness of double mosquito net and BG-trap for emergency vector surveillance during dengue fever epidemics:a comparative study[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2019,30(1):65-68. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.01.014. [14] Medeiros-Sousa AR,Fernandes A,Ceretti-Junior W,et al. Mosquitoes in urban green spaces:using an island biogeographic approach to identify drivers of species richness and composition[J]. Sci Rep,2017,7:17826. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-18208-x. [15] Schmidt CA,Comeau G,Monaghan AJ,et al. Effects of desiccation stress on adult female longevity in Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus (Diptera:Culicidae):results of a systematic review and pooled survival analysis[J]. Parasit Vectors,2018,11:267. DOI:10.1186/s13071-018-2808-6.
2020, Vol. 31 
