中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 212-214.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2020.02.019

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

3种不同器械在山西省不同地区诱捕白蛉效果比较研究

代培芳1, 田晓东1, 赵俊英1, 武滨2, 范志国2, 李艳2, 石义平2, 倪树青3, 程建书3, 马雅军4, 杨振洲5, 程璟侠1   

  1. 1 山西省疾病预防控制中心病媒生物防控科, 山西 太原 030012;
    2阳泉市疾病预防控制中心, 山西 阳泉 045000;
    3 武乡县疾病预防控制中心, 山西 武乡 046300;
    4 海军军医大学海军医学系, 上海 200433;
    5 解放军疾病预防控制中心, 北京 100071
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-25 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 程璟侠,Email:chengjingxia007@163.com
  • 作者简介:代培芳,女,主管技师,主要从事病媒生物防控工作,Email:sxcdcbmkdpf@sohu.com
  • 基金资助:
    山西省科技厅重点研发计划(201803D31205)

The effectiveness comparative study of three different devices in trapping sandflies in different areas of Shanxi province, China

DAI Pei-fang1, TIAN Xiao-dong1, ZHAO Jun-ying1, WU Bin2, FAN Zhi-guo2, LI Yan2, SHI Yi-ping2, NI Shu-qing3, CHENG Jian-shu3, MA Ya-jun4, YANG Zhen-zhou5, CHENG Jing-xia1   

  1. 1 Shanxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi Province, China;
    2 Yangquan City Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
    3 Wuxiang County Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
    4 Faculty of Naval Medicine, Navy Medical University;
    5 Center for Disease Control and Prevention of PLA
  • Received:2019-10-25 Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-04-20
  • Supported by:
    Suppported by the Key Research and Development Project of Shanxi Science and Technology Committee(No. 201803D31205)

摘要: 目的 通过对白蛉密度调查,比较不同器械诱捕白蛉的效果。方法 2017-2019年每年的6-8月,在山西省阳泉、长治、运城和临汾市共5个县(区)9个乡镇12个村庄13户农户禽畜圈,采用二氧化碳诱蚊灯、蚊太太诱蚊灯、吸血昆虫光谱诱捕装置3种器械诱捕白蛉,比较同一时间、同一生境中不同器械对白蛉的诱捕效果。使用SPSS 17.0软件对诱捕白蛉数量进行非参数2个相关样本的Wilcoxon检验。结果 共诱捕白蛉10 522只,其中阳泉市5 851只,长治市4 372只,临汾市294只,运城市5只;累计抽检5%的标本显微镜下鉴定,均为中华白蛉;3种不同诱捕器械诱捕白蛉数量范围在0~1 890只;同一场所不同器械诱捕白蛉数量范围在1~1 890只;3种不同器械诱捕白蛉数量经非参数2个相关样本Wilcoxon检验,二氧化碳诱蚊灯与蚊太太诱蚊灯及光谱诱蚊灯诱捕白蛉数量差异有统计学意义(P=0.034,P=0.039),蚊太太诱蚊灯与光谱诱蚊灯诱捕白蛉数量差异无统计学意义(P=0.348)。结论 综合数据统计结果及使用因素,蚊太太诱蚊灯是捕获白蛉的适宜器械。

关键词: 白蛉, 诱捕器械, 调查

Abstract: Objective To compare the effectiveness of three different devices in trapping sandflies by investigating the sandfly density. Methods From June to August of each year from 2017 to 2019, three types of devices, namely CO2 trap, Maxttrac trap, and mini light trap (MYSF-HJY-1), were used to collect sandflies from 13 rural household livestock or poultry pens in 12 villages of 9 townships in 5 counties (districts), including Yangquan, Changzhi, Yuncheng, and Linfen, of Shanxi province. The effectiveness of different devices in trapping sandflies at the same time and in the same habitat was compared. SPSS 17.0 software was used to conduct a non-parametric Wilcoxon test for two related samples on the numbers of sandflies trapped. Results A total of 10 522 sandflies were trapped, including 5 851 in Yangquan, 4 372 in Changzhi, 294 in Linfen, and 5 in Yuncheng. Five percent of the specimens were sampled randomly, and they were all identified as Phlebotomus chinensis according to microscopy. The numbers of sandflies trapped by the three different traps ranged from 0 to 1 890. The numbers of sandflies trapped by different traps at the same site ranged from 1 to 1 890. The numbers of sandflies trapped by the three different traps were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test for two related samples; the results showed that there were significant differences in the number of trapped sandflies between CO2 trap and Maxttrac trap (P=0.034), and between CO2 trap and mini light trap (P=0.039), but there was no significant difference between Maxttrac trap and mini light trap (P=0.348). Conclusion Based on the statistical results and considering the use factors, the most suitable device for trapping sandflies is the Maxttrac trap.

Key words: Sandfly, Trapping device, Investigation

中图分类号: