化学杀虫剂复配及生物杀虫剂对济宁市淡色库蚊灭效的现场研究

doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.03.015

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 296-299.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.03.015

化学杀虫剂复配及生物杀虫剂对济宁市淡色库蚊灭效的现场研究

宋晓^1,2, 程鹏¹, 吕晔源², 史琦琪^1,2, 刘宏美¹, 王海防¹, 刘丽娟¹, 郭秀霞¹, 张崇星¹, 赵玉强¹, 王怀位¹, 公茂庆¹

1 山东省医学科学院, 山东省寄生虫病防治研究所, 山东济宁 272033;
2 济南大学, 山东省医学科学院医学与生命科学学院, 山东济南 250022

收稿日期:2019-02-13 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20
通讯作者: 公茂庆,Email:gmq2005@163.com
作者简介:宋晓,女,在读硕士,主要从事媒介昆虫抗药性监测与治理工作,Email:15020777096@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81471985，81672059，81702034）；山东省医学科学院医药卫生科技创新工程

Efficacy of chemical insecticide mixture and biological insecticides against Culex pipiens pallens in Jining, China

SONG Xiao^1,2, CHENG Peng¹, LYU Ye-yuan², SHI Qi-qi^1,2, LIU Hong-mei¹, WANG Hai-fang¹, LIU Li-juan¹, GUO Xiu-xia¹, ZHANG Chong-xing¹, ZHAO Yu-qiang¹, WANG Huai-wei¹, GONG Mao-qing¹

1 Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Institute of Parasitic Disease Prevention and Control, Jining 272033, Shandong Province, China;
2 School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences

Received:2019-02-13 Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81471985, 81672059, 81702034), and the Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨常用化学杀虫剂复配以及生物杀虫剂对现场淡色库蚊的杀灭效果，为制定合理有效的蚊虫防治措施提供科学依据。方法采用幼虫浸渍法及药物复配方法，测试现场淡色库蚊对2种生物杀虫剂与4种化学杀虫剂的抗性及增效系数。结果现场淡色库蚊对苏云金芽孢杆菌以色列亚种和球形芽孢杆菌的抗性倍数分别为1.02和1.08倍，对氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯、敌敌畏和残杀威的抗性倍数分别为97.00、59.08、6.44和2.36倍，溴氰菊酯+敌敌畏、溴氰菊酯+残杀威、氯氰菊酯+敌敌畏、氯氰菊酯+残杀威复配共毒系数分别为156.24～182.37、163.28～201.36、166.23～190.56和160.23～199.58，敌敌畏+残杀威复配效果不佳。结论济宁市城区淡色库蚊对常用化学杀虫剂产生不同程度抗性，对生物杀虫剂表现敏感，建议采取生物杀虫剂或化学杀虫剂复配方式控制蚊虫孳生，减缓抗药性发展。

关键词: 淡色库蚊, 生物杀虫剂, 杀虫剂复配, 抗药性

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy of a mixture of common chemical insecticides and biological insecticides against Culex pipiens pallens, and to provide a scientific basis for establishing reasonable and effective mosquito control measures. Methods The larval impregnation method and drug complex formulation method were applied to measure the resistance and synergistic coefficients of Cx. pipiens pallens against two biological insecticides and four chemical insecticides. Results The resistance coefficients of Cx. pipiens pallens against Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and B. sphaericus were 1.02 and 1.08 times, respectively, and the resistance coefficients against cypermethrin, deltamethrin, DDVP, and propoxur were 97.00, 59.08, 6.44, and 2.36 times, respectively. The synergistic coefficient of deltamethrin+DDVP, deltamethrin+propoxur, cypermethrin+DDVP, and cypermethrin+propoxur were 156.24-182.37, 163.28- 201.36, 166.23-190.56, and 160.23-199.58, respectively. The synergistic effect of DDVP+ propoxur was not good. Conclusion Culex pipiens pallens in Jining city has developed varying degrees of resistance to common chemical insecticides, but is still sensitive to biological insecticides. It is suggested that biological insecticides or chemical insecticide mixtures be applied to control mosquito breeding and mitigate the development of insecticide resistance.

Key words: Culex pipiens pallens, Biological insecticide, Insecticide mixture, Insecticide resistance

中图分类号:

宋晓, 程鹏, 吕晔源, 史琦琪, 刘宏美, 王海防, 刘丽娟, 郭秀霞, 张崇星, 赵玉强, 王怀位, 公茂庆. 化学杀虫剂复配及生物杀虫剂对济宁市淡色库蚊灭效的现场研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(3): 296-299.

SONG Xiao, CHENG Peng, LYU Ye-yuan, SHI Qi-qi, LIU Hong-mei, WANG Hai-fang, LIU Li-juan, GUO Xiu-xia, ZHANG Chong-xing, ZHAO Yu-qiang, WANG Huai-wei, GONG Mao-qing. Efficacy of chemical insecticide mixture and biological insecticides against Culex pipiens pallens in Jining, China[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2019, 30(3): 296-299.

参考文献

[1] Guo JX,Ye WY,Liu XM,et al. piRNA-3312:a putative role for pyrethroid resistance in Culex pipiens pallens (Diptera:Culicidae)[J]. J Med Entomol,2017,54(4):1013-1018. DOI:10.1093/jme/tjx043.
[2] 李文刚,赵敏. 虫媒传染病流行现状[J]. 传染病信息,2011,24(1):8-11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-8134.2011.01.003.
[3] Benelli G,Lo Iacono A,Canale A,et al. Mosquito vectors and the spread of cancer:an overlooked connection?[J]. Parasitol Res,2016,115(6):2131-2137. DOI:10.1007/s00436-016-5037-y.
[4] Glunt KD,Abílio AP,Bassat Q,et al. Long-lasting insecticidal nets no longer effectively kill the highly resistant Anopheles funestus of southern Mozambique[J]. Malar J,2015,14:298. DOI:10.1186/s12936-015-0807-z.
[5] 赖辉兵,罗立旷,欧庆华,等. 云浮市首起报告登革热病例与蚊虫媒介监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(2):179-181. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.02. 023.
[6] Rašić G,Schama R,Powell R,et al. Contrasting genetic structure between mitochondrial and nuclear markers in the dengue fever mosquito from Rio de Janeiro:implications for vector control[J]. Evol Appl,2015,8(9):901-915. DOI:10.1111/eva.12301.
[7] 刘维德. 蚊类抗药性及其测定[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1979:53.
[8] 王新国,王怀位,甄天民,等. 山东省淡色库蚊抗药性及现场治理方法的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2004,15(1):25-26. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2004.01.009.
[9] 王新国,甄天民,王怀位,等. 复配杀虫剂杀灭淡色库蚊的现场效果研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2003,9(3):33-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2781.2003.03.013.
[10] 黄晓丹,赵久旭,寇景轩,等. 山东省东平湖地区淡色库蚊对常用杀虫剂的抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2013,24(5):406-408. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2013.05. 007.
[11] Ibrahim MA,Griko N,Junker M,et al. Bacillus thuringiensis:a genomics and proteomics perspective[J]. Bioeng Bugs,2010,1(1):31-50. DOI:10.4161/bbug.1.1.10519.
[12] 关鹏,秦培钢,代小娟,等. 苏云金芽胞杆菌cyt2Ba16基因的克隆表达[J]. 生物技术,2018,28(2):119-123.
[13] Schlein Y,Muller GC. Decrease of larval and subsequent adult Anopheles sergentii populations following feeding of adult mosquitoes from Bacillus sphaericus-containing attractive sugar baits[J]. Parasit Vectors,2015,8:244. DOI:10.1186/s13071-015-0845-y.
[14] Regis L,da Silva SB,Melo-Santos MAV. The use of bacterial larvicides in mosquito and black fly control programmes in Brazil[J]. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz,2000,95 Suppl 1:S207-210. DOI:10.1590/S0074-02762000000700035.

[1]	赵春春, 周欣欣, 李文玉, 伦辛畅, 刘小波, 吴海霞, 王君, 刘起勇, 孟凤霞. 2020年中国13省份登革热媒介白纹伊蚊抗药性监测及分析研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 30-37.
[2]	郑宇婷, 杨春梅, 杨明东, 姜进勇. 云南边境地区登革热媒介伊蚊生态学及抗药性监测[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 38-43.
[3]	涂涛田, 肖汉森, 孟凤霞, 刘起勇, 刘小波, 何亚明, 季恒青. 重庆市2019年登革热暴发疫情应急控制后媒介伊蚊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 44-47.
[4]	吴治明, 褚宏亮. 江苏省城市环境中蚊虫越冬状况调查研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 83-88.
[5]	吕文祥, 程鹏, 彭荟, 王海洋, 王海防, 郭秀霞, 张崇星, 刘宏美, 公茂庆, 刘丽娟. 山东省东平湖地区2021年淡色库蚊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 104-107.
[6]	周毅彬, 姚隽一, 朱奕奕, 朱江, 冷培恩, 吴寰宇. CO₂诱蚊灯法监测淡色库蚊的时间频次模型研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 137-142.
[7]	周长印, 关晴晴, 戴雨琪, 刘洪霞, 钱坤. 淡色库蚊保幼激素受体基因CpMet的表达特性和功能分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 680-685.
[8]	胡远峰, 谭梁飞. 湖北省鄂州市2016－2020年蜚蠊密度及抗药性监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 599-603.
[9]	王洋, 刘宏美, 郭秀霞, 宋晓, 王海洋, 程鹏, 王海防, 王怀位, 公茂庆. 淡色库蚊表皮蛋白CpCPR117基因克隆及表达分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(4): 436-440.
[10]	陈晓敏, 刘芹, 周良才, 吴丽群, 包继永, 吴太平. 武汉市2009－2015年家蝇对常用杀虫剂的抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(4): 468-471.
[11]	李峰, 崔士磊, 闫静, 丁新阳. 河南省南阳市德国小蠊对常用杀虫剂的抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(4): 472-474.
[12]	王丹, 史鹏, 赵文平, 闫英, 周敬祝, 田珍灶, 梁文琴. 贵州省兴义及赤水市白纹伊蚊抗药性监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(3): 302-306.
[13]	李春燕, 田丰源, 凌远农, 肖崇堃, 张福艳. 四川省自贡市登革热媒介白纹伊蚊密度监测及其对常用杀虫剂的抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(3): 307-311.
[14]	邹亚明, 兰策介, 朱丁, 游颖琦, 刘蕴华, 陈恩品. 江苏省无锡市2010－2018年德国小蠊对常用杀虫剂的抗药性发展趋势分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(2): 193-196.
[15]	周毅彬, 朱江, 冷培恩, 吴寰宇. 基于泰勒幂法则的诱蚊灯抽样模型研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(1): 21-25.

化学杀虫剂复配及生物杀虫剂对济宁市淡色库蚊灭效的现场研究

Efficacy of chemical insecticide mixture and biological insecticides against Culex pipiens pallens in Jining, China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价