中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 260-261.

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

CO2灯诱法与紫外灯诱法捕蚊效果比较

任彤, 刘艳华, 王艺凯, 田洁, 张丽杰, 郭惠琳, 郭天宇   

  1. 北京出入境检验检疫局医学媒介生物检测实验室,北京 100621
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-22 出版日期:2011-06-20 发布日期:2011-06-20
  • 作者简介:任彤(1985-),女,助理工程师,主要从事媒介生物检测工作。Email: rent@bjciq.gov.cn

Attracting effects of carbon dioxide lamps versus ultraviolet light on mosquitoes

REN Tong, LIU Yan-hua, WANG Yi-kai, TIAN Jie, ZHANG Li-jie, GUO Hui-lin, GUO Tian-yu   

  1. Beijing Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Medical Vector Surveillance Laboratory, Beijing 100621, China
  • Received:2010-11-22 Online:2011-06-20 Published:2011-06-20

摘要:

目的 现场调查CO2灯诱法与紫外灯诱法的捕蚊效果。方法 以每月3次的频率分别于日落前后2 h,同时采取CO2灯诱法和紫外灯诱法诱捕蚊虫,连续诱捕6个月。结果 2种方法共捕获成蚊2483只,其中CO2灯诱法捕获成蚊1544只,紫外灯诱法捕获成蚊939只;CO2灯诱法捕获的成蚊密度〔11.20只/(灯·h)〕显著高于紫外灯诱法〔6.87只/(灯·h)〕。结论 CO2灯诱法捕蚊效果好于紫外灯诱法,是蚊虫密度监测的一种有效方法。

关键词: CO2诱蚊灯, 紫外诱蚊灯, 蚊虫密度, 监测

Abstract:

Objective To compare the attracting effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) traps with ultraviolet (UV) light traps on mosquitoes in field settings. Methods Both approaches were used within a 2-hour window before and after sunset, three times monthly, for six consecutive months. Results A total of 2483 mosquitoes were captured, of which 1544 were attracted by CO2 traps and 939 by UV light. The density of mosquitoes captured by CO2 traps (11.20/lamp·hour) was significantly higher than by UV light traps (6.87/light·hour). Conclusion The attracting effect of carbon dioxide traps was better than that of UV light traps. CO2 traps can be used to effectively monitor mosquito density.

Key words: CO2 lamp trap, Ultraviolet light trap, Mosquito density, Monitoring

中图分类号: