中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 103-106.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2021.01.022

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

卫生城市暗访评价中的病媒生物预防控制指标分析

王东, 张晓, 张彤, 辛正   

  1. 济南市疾病预防控制中心消毒与病媒生物防制所, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-07 出版日期:2021-02-20 发布日期:2021-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 辛正,E-mail:xinzheng121@163.com
  • 作者简介:王东,男,博士,副主任技师,主要从事病媒生物防制工作,E-mail:9830129@163.com

An analysis of indicators for vector prevention and control in the secret evaluation of healthy cities

WANG Dong, ZHANG Xiao, ZHANG Tong, XIN Zheng   

  1. Department of Disinfection and Vector Control, Ji'nan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ji'nan, Shandong 250021, China
  • Received:2020-07-07 Online:2021-02-20 Published:2021-02-20

摘要: 目的 分析在国家卫生城市暗访中病媒生物预防控制的薄弱环节,提出创建或巩固卫生城市工作中病媒生物预防控制的重点与方向。方法 采用回顾性资料分析,汇总35个国家卫生城市(县、区)的病媒生物预防控制暗访评价指标。利用IBM SPSS 20.0软件,暗访总分与病媒生物预防控制单项分值的相关性采用Pearson相关分析,不同类型城市的分值采用Independent-Samples t test方法进行分析比较。结果 暗访总分与病媒生物预防控制单项得分呈正相关(r=0.812,P<0.001);地级市与县级市(t=0.375,P=0.710)、创建城市与复审城市(t=1.506,P=0.141)的病媒生物预防控制分值差异无统计学意义;二级指标中,蝇类防制和鼠类防制2个指标易失分;三级指标中,灭鼠毒饵站、重点行业防鼠设施、灭/防蝇设施、蝇类孳生地控制、成蝇密度控制和蚊虫孳生地控制6项指标达不到及格标准。结论 病媒生物预防控制工作与城市管理的其他工作相辅相成,其中病媒生物孳生地管理和防护设施建设是薄弱环节。全面动员、广泛宣传、健康教育、法规建设、专业指导和设施完善是巩固病媒生物控制效果的保障。

关键词: 卫生城市, 病媒生物, 预防控制

Abstract: Objective To analyze the weak links of vector prevention and control in the secret evaluation of healthy cities in China, and to propose the focus and direction of vector prevention and control in the establishment or consolidation of healthy cities. Methods The secret evaluation indicators for vector prevention and control in 35 national healthy cities (counties or districts) were retrospectively reviewed. With IBM SPSS 20.0 software, the correlation between the total score and the individual score of vector prevention and control was determined by Pearson correlation analysis. The scores of different cities were compared using the independent-samples t test. Results There was a positive correlation between the total score and the individual score of vector prevention and control (r =0.812, P <0.001). No significant differences in the scores of vector prevention and control were found between prefecture-level cities and county-level cities (t =0.375, P =0.710) and between established healthy cities and reexamined healthy cities (t =1.506, P =0.141). Among the second-level indicators, two indicators of fly control and rodent control were where points were easy to lose. Among the third-level indicators, rodent bait station, anti-rodent facilities in key industries, facilities for fly control, fly breeding area control, adult fly density control, and mosquito breeding area control failed to meet the standard. Conclusion Vector prevention and control, where the management of vector breeding areas and the construction of anti-vector facilities are weak links, is closely related to other urban management work. Comprehensive mobilization, extensive publicity, health education, establishment of regulations, professional guidance, and improvement of facilities are the guarantee to consolidate the effects of vector control.

Key words: Healthy city, Vector, Prevention and control

中图分类号: