一起炭疽疫情中炭疽病原检测方法的应用与评价

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 231-233.

一起炭疽疫情中炭疽病原检测方法的应用与评价

张慧娟¹, 梁旭东¹, 海岩², 李忠延³, 袁海涛³, 郭长山⁴, 东晓晖⁵, 魏建春¹

1 中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所, 传染病预防控制国家重点实验室, 北京102206;
2 内蒙古自治区疾病预防控制中心;
3 兴安盟疾病预防控制中心;
4 科尔沁右翼前旗疾病预防控制中心;
5 扎赉特旗疾病预防控制中心

收稿日期:2012-02-10 出版日期:2012-06-20 发布日期:2012-06-20
通讯作者: 魏建春,Email: weijianchun@icdc.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项课题(2008ZX10004-008)

Evaluation of the methods applied for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in anthrax outbreak

ZHANG Hui-juan¹, LIANG Xu-dong¹, HAI Yan², LI Zhong-yan³, YUAN Hai-tao³, GUO Chang-shan⁴, DONG Xiao-hui⁵, WEI Jian-chun¹

1 State Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;
2 Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
3 Xing’an League Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
4 Keyouqian Banner Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
5 Zhalaite Town Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Received:2012-02-10 Online:2012-06-20 Published:2012-06-20
Supported by:
Supported by the Major National Science and Technology Projects of China(No. 2008ZX10004-008)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析总结一起炭疽疫情中应急检测的经验与问题,为炭疽疾病预防控制提供参考依据。方法采集报告的疑似皮肤炭疽患者皮损渗出液和静脉血标本,与病例相关的病死动物和土壤标本,渗出液采集采用载玻片直接蘸取和无菌棉签擦取2种方法,用涂片镜检、直接分离培养和肉汤增菌后分离培养细菌以及炭疽芽胞杆菌毒力基因PCR扩增方法检测病原,分析检测结果。结果共采集标本57份,病例标本占91.23%,病死牛肉及剖牛处土壤标本占8.77%。病例标本采集时间距发病时间最短1 d,最长23 d,平均6.62 d。29例疑似皮肤炭疽患者在采样时其中16例(占55.17%)已使用抗生素类药物治疗,4例(占13.79%)未曾使用抗生素。从2例未使用抗生素的患者皮损渗出液和1份病死牛肉中分离到炭疽芽胞杆菌,分离阳性率为5.26%;其中1例患者皮损渗出液涂片镜检阳性;全部标本PCR扩增结果均为阴性。结论标本炭疽芽胞杆菌阳性检出率较低,与采样方法和采样时机关系较大,应加强部门间的沟通协作和人群的健康教育,做到疫情早报告、早确诊、早控制。

关键词: 炭疽, 疫情, 应急检测

Abstract: Objective To analyze and summarize the experience and problems in emergent detection of Bacillus anthracis in anthrax outbreak for providing a basis for anthrax prevention and control. Methods The study collected lesions exudates and blood samples from suspected cases, as well as related animal samples and soil samples. The lesions were collected by slides and sterile cotton swabs. Smear microscopy, direct culture and broth enrichment were used to isolate and foster virulence genes. The virulence genes were amplified by PCR for detection of pathogens. Results Fifty-seven specimens were collected. 91.23% of the specimens came from B. anthracis cases and the other 8.77% came from cattle and soil. The time window between disease outbreak and collection of case specimens was 1 day at least and 23 days at most, with an average of 6.62 days. 16 (55.17%) of 29 suspected cases had received antibiotic treatment before their specimens were collected while 4 (13.79%) suspected cases had never received any antibiotic treatment. B. anthracis was isolated from lesions of 2 suspected cases who did not receive antibiotic treatment and 1 dead cattle, with 5.26% of positive isolation rate. Lesions from 1 patient had positive result under smear microscopy. All the specimens were tested negative after PCR amplification. Conclusion Low detection rate of B. anthracis is closely associated with the methods and time window of sample collection. Therefore, we should enhance interdepartmental communication and coordination and public education for early reporting, diagnosis and control of the pandemic.

Key words: Anthrax, Outbreak, Emergent detection

中图分类号:

R378.7⁺2

张慧娟, 梁旭东, 海岩, 李忠延, 袁海涛, 郭长山, 东晓晖, 魏建春. 一起炭疽疫情中炭疽病原检测方法的应用与评价[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2012, 23(3): 231-233.

ZHANG Hui-juan, LIANG Xu-dong, HAI Yan, LI Zhong-yan, YUAN Hai-tao, GUO Chang-shan, DONG Xiao-hui, WEI Jian-chun. Evaluation of the methods applied for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in anthrax outbreak[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2012, 23(3): 231-233.

[1]	徐名芳, 岳玉娟, 刘小波, 王君, 刘国军, 刘起勇, 张钦凤. 云南省瑞丽及景洪市2006－2018年登革热疫情特征比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(3): 318-323.
[2]	周良才, 周仲瑾, 吴太平, 包继永, 陈晓敏, 吴丽群. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间华南海鲜批发市场鼠类应急监测与控制研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(5): 513-516.
[3]	孙昼, 陈珺芳, 竹军伟, 考庆君, 黄仁杰, 汪皓秋. 杭州市2018年一起农村登革热暴发疫情调查研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(4): 465-468.
[4]	叶凌, 谭启龙, 赵剑刚, 李世波, 任宜, 管临福, 舒纪为. 浙江省一起海岛地区登革热本地暴发疫情的隐性感染情况调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(3): 353-357.
[5]	郭荣, 谢木西丁·艾麦提, 党辉, 马合木提, 排孜拉·海力力, 艾山吐尔·马坎, 拜合提牙·赛里木哈孜, 周志刚, 布仁明德, 黎唯, 崔燕. 中亚边境区域新疆天山南脉、帕米尔高原东部动物鼠疫疫情分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(1): 16-20.
[6]	海岩, 王文瑞, 范蒙光, 跃华, 宋健, 张恩民, 张慧娟, 魏建春, 聂莉. 炭疽暴发疫情中炭疽病例诊断方法应用与建议[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(5): 494-497.
[7]	廖勇, 宗俊, 肖光, 黄仁发, 唐松, 罗华彬, 胡晓军, 唐满妹, 李建华. 江西省首起登革热本地感染病例流行病学调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(1): 84-86.
[8]	田珍灶, 胡灿, 周敬祝, 邹志霆, 李法锦, 郭军, 黄红武, 余多, 姚刚, 冷远强, 曾地敏, 杨国军, 郭黄吉. 贵州省道真县一起输入性登革热疫情的调查处置分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(1): 80-82.
[9]	阿衣夏木·克尤木, 木合塔尔·艾山, 卢忠荣, 艾尔肯·塔西铁木尔. 新疆拜城县2015年人间布鲁氏菌病血清学检测及疫情分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(1): 94-96.
[10]	王晶, 唐振柱, 林玫, 陈敏玫, 周开姣, 何为涛, 阳益萍, 谭毅. 南宁市首起登革热暴发疫情处置及成本效益分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2017, 28(3): 258-261.
[11]	赖辉兵, 罗立旷, 欧庆华, 冯梓来, 张华, 何忠强, 钟红苗, 雷洁贞, 陈小敏. 云浮市首起报告登革热病例与蚊虫媒介监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2017, 28(2): 179-181.
[12]	贾玉新, 刘旭红, 何建, 李治平, 吴照. 某建设集团尼日利亚项目部建设工地疟疾和伤寒疫情的调查与处置[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2016, 27(5): 501-503.
[13]	刘彦君, 罗剑龙, 段炳华. 云南省大理州2013年鼠疫疫情监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2016, 27(3): 315-316.
[14]	鱼爱水, 杨永慧, 李纯辉, 王永, 郑志良, 刘慧, 周红宁. 缅甸边境地区一起恶性疟暴发疫情调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2015, 26(5): 503-505.
[15]	木合塔尔·艾山, 何海波, 邰新平, 陈侠, 童苏祥, 王忠. 新疆2013年人间布鲁氏菌病监测结果及疫情分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2015, 26(1): 86-88.