中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 316-318.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

黑箱法与二氧化碳诱捕法蚊虫监测结果比较

冷培恩1, 刘洪霞1, 唐毅2, 曹辉3, 束惠慧3, 徐仁权1   

  1. 1 上海市疾病预防控制中心病媒生物防治科,上海 200336;
    2 上海市卢湾区疾病预防控制中心;
    3 上海市黄浦区疾病预防控制中心
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-31 出版日期:2011-08-20 发布日期:2011-08-20
  • 作者简介:冷培恩(1963-),男,主任医师,主要从事媒介生物学研究。Email: peleng@scdc.sh.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项课题(2008ZX10004-010)

Comparison of mosquito surveillance efficiency between the black box method and carbon dioxide method

LENG Pei-en1, LIU Hong-xia1, TANG Yi2, CAO Hui3, SHU Hui-hui3, XU Ren-quan1   

  1. 1 Shanghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China;
    2 Luwan Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
    3 Huangpu Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Received:2011-01-31 Online:2011-08-20 Published:2011-08-20
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Major National Science and Technology Projects of China(No. 2008ZX10004-010)

摘要:

目的 比较黑箱法和二氧化碳(CO2)诱捕法监测蚊虫密度的差异,探讨黑箱法在蚊虫密度监测中的作用。方法 在2个区7个点比较黑箱法和CO2诱捕法监测蚊虫密度、种类的差异,比较2种方法 监测蚊种构成比、性别比和季节消长趋势的相关性。结果 黑箱法监测蚊虫平均密度为25.63只/箱,是CO2诱捕法平均密度(7.32只/器)的3.50倍,黑箱法监测雌蚊平均密度为14.65只/箱,是CO2诱捕法平均密度(6.23只/器)的2.35倍,2种方法差异有统计学意义,密度指数无相关性;黑箱法捕获蚊种构成,淡色库蚊占捕蚊总数的94.97%,为优势蚊种;白纹伊蚊占4.97%,三带喙库蚊和中华按蚊各仅占0.03%;CO2诱捕法捕获蚊种构成,淡色库蚊占捕蚊总数的79.26%,为优势蚊种;白纹伊蚊占18.27%,三带喙库蚊和中华按蚊分别占2.10%和0.37%,2种监测方法蚊虫构成比差异有统计学意义。结论 黑箱法设备简单,易操作,经济成本低,适用范围较广,比较适合淡色库蚊的监测,在淡色库蚊为优势种的地区,可使用黑箱法进行蚊虫密度监测;CO2诱捕法除适合淡色库蚊监测外,还适用于白纹伊蚊监测。

关键词: 黑箱法, 二氧化碳法, 蚊虫, 监测

Abstract:

Objective To compare mosquito densities using the black box method and the carbon dioxide method and explore the application of the black box approach. Methods The black box method and the carbon dioxide method were used to measure mosquito density and composition at seven locations in two districts of Shanghai. Correlations between species composition, sex ratios and seasonal variation were compared using the two Methods. Results The average mosquito density using the black box method (25.63 mosquitoes/box) was 3.50 times higher than the carbon dioxide method (7.32 mosquitoes/ device), and the average density of female mosquitoes using the black box method (14.65 mosquitoes/box) was 2.35 times higher than the carbon dioxide method (6.23 mosquitoes/device), densities were significantly different. The density indices of the two approaches were not correlated. The species composition recorded by the black box method was: Culex pipiens pallens (94.97%), Aedes albopictus (4.97%), Cx. tritaeriorhynchus (0.03%), and Anopheles sinensis (0.03%). The species composition recorded by the carbon dioxide method was: Cx. pipiens pallens (79.26%), Ae. albopictus (18.27%), Cx. tritaeriorhynchus (2.10%) and An. sinensis (0.37%). The differences in composition were also statistically significant. Conclusion As compared to the carbon dioxide method, the black box method is readily applicable, simple, affordable and can be used in most locations, particularly habitats dominated by Cx. pipiens pallens. The carbon dioxide method can be used for the monitoring of both Cx. pipiens pallens and Ae. albopictus.

Key words: Black box method, Carbon dioxide method, Mosquitoes, Surveillance

中图分类号: