不同地域内单位突击灭鼠质量分析

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志

不同地域内单位突击灭鼠质量分析

徐仁权1;罗引珍1;徐康2;顾文祥3;须俊明4;胡家贵5

1上海市疾病预防控制中心200031;2卢湾区疾病预防控制中心;3闸北区疾病预防控制中心;4宝山区疾病预防控制中心;5闵行区疾病预防控制中心

出版日期:2001-02-20 发布日期:2001-02-20

Analysis of Quality for Rodent Control in Apartments on the Different Streets

XU Ren-quan*; LUO Yin-zhen; XU Kang; et al

Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention 200031

Online:2001-02-20 Published:2001-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:了解街道不同地域内单位突击灭鼠的质量。方法:询问法及现场检查街道示范路段、街道政府所在地周围、相邻其他街道路段上的单位参与灭鼠过程、投药质量和鼠征及防鼠设施。结果:3种地域上单位突击灭鼠的知晓率分别为99.38%95.04%88.71%;投药率依次为87.56%82.09%、75.33%;鼠征阳性率分别达16.59%、19.02%、21.72%;防鼠设施合格率依次为78.99%、68.75%、52.86%;单位反映灭鼠有效率为81.41%、55.37%、55.74%。结论:暴露了街道灭鼠工作的不均衡性,应在抓好示范路段单位灭鼠基础上,加强周边地区防灭鼠,提高除害站灭鼠服务质量和指导作用。

关键词: 不同地域, 灭鼠质量

Abstract: Objective:To analysisthe quality of rodent control with poison baits in apartments on the different streetsin a process of once rodent control.Methods:Direct observing and questionary.Result:The rate of cast bait was 87.56%,82.09% and 75.33% respectively.The rate of rodent trace was 16.59%,19.02% and 21.72% respectively.Thequalified rate for rodent proof equipment was 78.99%,68.75%,52.86%,respectively.The rate of effect was 81.41%,55.37% and 55.74%in order.Conclusions:The resultindicated that rodent control in the street is un-balanced.The rodent control of around street should bestrengthened.

徐仁权1;罗引珍1;徐康2;顾文祥3;须俊明4;胡家贵5. 不同地域内单位突击灭鼠质量分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志.

XU Ren-quan*; LUO Yin-zhen; XU Kang; et al. Analysis of Quality for Rodent Control in Apartments on the Different Streets[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control.

[1]	徐仁权1; 邵国财2; 蔡恩茂3; 罗引珍1; 王士珍1. 鼠迹法检查灭鼠质量的作用评价[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2000, 11(6): 405-407.
[2]	徐仁权1; 顾文祥2; 叶苗凉3; 金兆钢4. 上海市拆迁地区灭鼠质量及防制对策研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 1997, 8(3): 164-166.