中国媒介生物学及控制杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

4种鼠情调查方法的比较研究

王灵岚; 洪朝长; 陈小彬; 陈学榕   

  1. 福建省卫生防疫站 福州350001; 莆田市卫生防疫站; 莆田县卫生防站
  • 出版日期:1995-10-20 发布日期:1995-10-20

Comparative Study on Four Investigating Methods for Rodent Density

Wang Ling-lan;et al   

  1. Fujian Health and Anti-Epidemic Station
  • Online:1995-10-20 Published:1995-10-20

摘要: 本文报道应用配对资料设计对4种常用家栖鼠类种群密度调查方法进行比较研究,对4种方法所测得的相对鼠密度指标进行了相关与回归分析。不同鼠情调查方法衡量灭鼠效率有很大差异,测定的灭鼠效率与调查方法的灵敏度成反比。文中还讨论了家鼠对捕鼠器械长期布放的反应,以及不同鼠情调查方法的适用性。

关键词: 家鼠, 种群密度, 调查方法, 灭鼠率

Abstract: This paper reported the comparative study on four kinds of investigating methods for rodent population density,powdered-spot,bait expending,clip-trap capture as well as cagetrap capture.Correlation and regression analysis were engaged between the data obtained by different methods.There were great difference among different methods for determining the killing efficiency of rodenticide,which would be in verse proportion to the susceptibility of the investigating method.The repercussions of domestic rodents to the long-term traping and the suitability for different investigating methods was also discussed.