中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 776-780.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.06.002

• 实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

BG-home诱蚊器对常见蚊虫诱捕效果的实验测定及评价研究

邓惠1, 刘礼平1, 高可2, 段金花1, 陈宗晶1, 芦瑞鹏1, 沈秀婷1, 阴伟雄1, 秦冰1, 吴军1, 林立丰1   

  1. 1. 广东省疾病预防控制中心消毒与病媒生物预防控制所, 广东 广州 511430;
    2. 杭州维圆生物科技有限公司, 浙江 杭州 310021
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-31 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2022-12-09
  • 作者简介:邓惠,女,博士,主管技师,主要从事病媒防控研究,E-mail:dh2582@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金(B2022330);国家重点研发计划(2020YFC1200100)

Laboratory determination and evaluation of trapping effects of BG-home mosquito trap for common mosquitoes

DENG Hui1, LIU Li-ping1, GAO Ke2, DUAN Jin-hua1, CHEN Zong-jing1, LU Rui-peng1, SHEN Xiu-ting1, YIN Wei-xiong1, QIN Bing1, WU Jun1, LIN Li-feng1   

  1. 1. Institute of Disinfection and Vector Control, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China;
    2. Hangzhou Weiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
  • Received:2022-05-31 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2022-12-09
  • Supported by:
    Medical Research Fund project of Guangdong (No. B2022330); National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2020YFC1200100)

摘要: 目的 通过实验室内模拟试验测定和评价BG-home诱蚊器(BG-home)对白纹伊蚊、埃及伊蚊、致倦库蚊的诱捕效果。方法 在28 m3容积的标准测试玻璃间内,BG-home在开启蓝光、不开蓝光2种情况下,分别进行BG-homescent、BG-sweetscent、佛山钱一多诱思达伊蚊专用引诱剂(诱思达)和无引诱剂的蚊虫诱集试验。24h后观察试验组诱捕蚊虫数、空白对照组的蚊虫死亡数,采用Abbott公式对诱捕率进行校正,评价诱集效果。结果 BG-homescent联合蓝光对白纹伊蚊、埃及伊蚊、致倦库蚊平均诱集率分别为94.00%、93.33%和81.27%;无蓝光分别是90.97%、90.00%和75.67%。BG-sweetscent联合蓝光对上述3种蚊虫平均诱集率分别为86.53%、80.67%和70.57%;无蓝光分别是83.50%、76.67%和67.00%。诱思达联合蓝光对上述3种蚊虫平均诱集率分别为88.47%、66.00%和59.67%;无蓝光分别是84.75%、63.33%和52.33%。无诱饵BG-home开启蓝光对上述3种蚊虫平均诱集率分别为38.00%、22.67%和62.33%;无蓝光分别是35.33%、20.00%和22.33%。结论 BG-home使用上述3种引诱剂对白纹伊蚊的诱集效果最好,其次是埃及伊蚊;在无诱饵的情况下使用蓝光后对致倦库蚊的诱集增效显著。模拟试验表明BG-home联合使用诱饵对常见蚊虫,尤其对伊蚊的诱集效果好,可应用于登革热等防控现场的蚊媒监测与防治。

关键词: BG-home诱蚊器, 蚊虫引诱剂, 白纹伊蚊, 埃及伊蚊, 致倦库蚊, 诱集, 模拟试验

Abstract: Objective To determine and evaluate the effect of the BG-home mosquito trap for Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti, and Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus by laboratory simulation experiments. Methods In a standard glass test room of 28 m3 in volume, mosquito trapping experiments were performed using BG-home, in the presence or absence of blue light, in combination with each of the attractants BG-homescent, BG-sweetscent, and Yousida (Qianyiduo Co., Ltd., Foshan, China) or no attractant. After 24 hours, we counted the number of captured mosquitoes in the experimental groups and the number of dead mosquito in the blank control group. The capture rate was corrected using the Abbott formula to evaluate the trapping effect. Results The mean capture rates of Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti, and Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus were: 94.00%, 93.33%, and 81.27%, respectively, by BG-homescent with blue light; 90.97%, 90.00%, and 75.67%, respectively, by BG-homescent without blue light; 86.53%, 80.67%, and 70.57%, respectively, by BG-sweetscent with blue light; 83.50%, 76.67%, and 67.00%, respectively, by BG-sweetscent without blue light; 88.47%, 66.00%, and 59.67%, respectively, by Yousida with blue light; 84.75%, 63.33%, and 52.33%, respectively, by Yousida without blue light; 38.00%, 22.67%, and 62.33%, respectively, by attractant-free BG-home with blue light; 35.33%, 20.00%, and 22.33%, respectively, by attractant-free BG-home without blue light. Conclusion With the above three attractants, BG-home had the best trapping effect for Ae. albopictus, followed by Ae. aegypti. Blue light significantly enhanced its trapping effect for Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus without the use of attractants. BG-home combined with attractants shows a good trapping effect for common mosquitoes, especially Aedes species, which can be used for mosquito surveillance and control in dengue prevention and control.

Key words: BG-home, Mosquito attractant, Aedes albopictus, Aedes aegypti, Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus, Lure, Simulation test

中图分类号: