Original reports

Clustering analysis on the regional division of the resistance levels of Blattella germanica

Expand
  • Hebei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang 050021, Hebei Province, China

Received date: 2016-05-09

  Online published: 2016-10-20

Supported by

Supported by the Key Issues of Medical Science Research in Hebei Province (No. 20150103)

Abstract

Objective The resistance level of nine local strains of Blattella germanica was divided into regions by clustering in Hebei province, providing the basis for regional control of B. germanica. Methods The method of contact with chemical cover was used in this study. The resistance ratios in different populations were categorized by clustering analysis. Results According to the theory of cluster analysis processing, the data of resistance levels were clustered to four categories to 4 groups. The first category is Shijiazhuang and Qinhuangdao strains: low to medium resistance to beta-cypermethrin low resistance to propoxur, high resistance to acephate and permethrin, medium to high resistance to deltamethrin; the second category was Baoding and Handan strains: low to medium resistance to beta-cypermethrin, acephate and deltamethrin, and low resistance to permethrin and propoxur; the third category was Zhangjiakou strain: high resistance to permethrin and acephate, medium resistance to beta-cypermethrin and deltamethrin, low resistance to propoxur; the fourth category was Cangzhou, Xingtai, Chengde, Tangshan strains: medium to high resistance to beta-cypermethrin, low to medium resistance to acephate, high resistance to permethrin: medium resistance to deltamethrin, and low resistance to propoxur. Conclusion Clustering analysis can be satisfactory tool to classify resistance levels in different regions.

Cite this article

HAN Xiao-li, GAO Wen, HUANG Gang, MA Li-hua, WANG Xi-ming . Clustering analysis on the regional division of the resistance levels of Blattella germanica[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2016 , 27(5) : 467 -473 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.05.011

References

[1] 侯威远,蔡伟,赵岩,等. 德国小蠊对5种杀虫剂的抗药性测定[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2012,18(2):150-151.
[2] 王学军,赖世宏,赵志刚,等. 山东省德国小蠊对5种杀虫剂的抗药性调查研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2012,18(4): 332-335.
[3] 葛军旗,张洪江,张政,等. 北京市朝阳区德国小蠊对杀虫剂抗性分布情况调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2009, 20(6):525-527.
[4] 杨迎宇. 德国小蠊对3种常用杀虫剂的抗性调查[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2012,18(1):36-37.
[5] 赵志刚,霍新北,王学军. 德国小蠊对9种常用杀虫剂的抗性测定[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2012,18(1):38-40.
[6] 周炯林,丁言良,胡攀,等. 国际航行船舶携带德国小蠊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2012,23(4): 337-338.
[7] 魏春清,周日辉,赵兴. 连云港市德国小蠊对常用杀虫剂的抗药性调查[J]. 医学动物防制,2012,28(11):1244-1245.
[8] Lee LC, Lee CY. Insecticide resistance profiles and possible underlying mechanisms in German cockroaches (Blattella germanica Linnaeus) (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) from Peninsular Malaysia[J]. Med Entomol Zool,2004,55(2): 77-93.
[9] 潘丽军,陈锦权. 试验设计与数据处理[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社,2008:152.
[10] Kerah-Hinzoumbé C, Péka M, Nwane P, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae from south-western Chad, Central Africa[J]. Malar J,2008,7(1):192.
[11] 邓海燕. 聚类分析与判别分析的区别[J]. 武汉学刊,2006(1):29-31.
[12] 王效华,冯祯民. 运用聚类分析法进行中国农村家庭能源消费的区域划分[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2001,24(4):103-106.

Outlines

/