Original Reports

The indices correlation analysis of surveillance methods for larval and adult mosquitoes in urban areas of Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China

Expand
  • Hangzhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang Province, China

Received date: 2019-09-30

  Online published: 2020-02-20

Supported by

Supported by the General Project of Science and Technology Program from Hangzhou Health Commission (No. 2017A65)

Abstract

Objective To study the correlation between the Breteau index (BI) method, double mosquito net method, and lamp trapping method, and to explore the applicability of these surveillance methods for larval and adult mosquitoes in the urban environment of Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China. Methods We selected five urban districts of Shangcheng, Xiacheng, Xihu, Jianggan, and Gongshu in Hangzhou as surveillance points, and conducted surveillance two times, respectively, in the first and last ten days of each month from April to November of 2017 and 2018. The density of immature mosquitoes was surveyed by the BI method and the density of adult mosquitoes were surveyed by the double mosquito net method and lamp trapping method. BI, double mosquito net index(DMNI), and lamp trapping mosquito index (LTMI) were calculated. The correlations between these surveillance indicators were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation. Results During April to November, 2017, seasonal variation in BI of Hangzhou showed a single-peak pattern, with BI gradually increasing from April to June and then declining rapidly from July to November; the change in LTMI also displayed a single-peak pattern, with the peak at 2.05 mosquitoes/trap·night in June; the DMNI increased gradually from April to June, reaching a maximum of 2.93 mosquitoes/net·hour in June; in 2017, BI, DMNI, and LTMI averaged 9.28, 1.41 mosquitoes/net·hour, and 0.97 mosquitoes/trap·night, respectively; there was a positive correlation between BI, DMNI, and LTMI (BI and DMNI, rs=0.398, P=0.012; BI and LTMI, rs=0.681, P<0.001; DNMI and LTMI, rs=0.517, P=0.001). During April to November, 2018, BI in Hangzhou was generally at a low level, and there was no obvious seasonal variation; LTMI showed a single-peak pattern, with the peak at 1.06 mosquitoes/trap·night in September; DNMI increased gradually from April to July, reaching a maximum of 4.88 mosquitoes/net·hour in July; BI, DNMI, and LTMI in 2018 averaged 3.83, 2.39 mosquitoes/net·hour, and 0.53 mosquitoes/trap·night, respectively; there was a positive correlation between DNMI and LTMI (rs=0.478, P=0.002), but neither of the two indicators was correlated with BI (BI and DNMI, rs=0.249, P=0.122; BI and LTMI, rs=0.165, P=0.308). Conclusion There is a certain correlation between surveillance methods for larval and adult mosquitoes, and both types of surveillance methods can effectively reflect the abundance of mosquito vectors in urban areas. At the same time, mosquito surveillance methods are susceptible to external conditions, and should be used under strict quality control.

Cite this article

CAO Yang, WEI Ling-ya, WANG Hui-min, KONG Qing-xin . The indices correlation analysis of surveillance methods for larval and adult mosquitoes in urban areas of Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2020 , 31(1) : 32 -35 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2020.01.007

References

[1] 刘起勇. 新时代媒介生物传染病形势及防控对策[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2019,30(1):1-6,11. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.01.001. Liu QY. Epidemic profile of vector-borne diseases and vector control strategies in the new era[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2019,30(1):1-6,11. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.01. 001.
[2] 史书路,于长友,王雪嵋,等. 蚊媒传染病传入我国风险及防控策略[J]. 口岸卫生控制,2015,20(1):5-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5777.2015.01.002. Shi SL,Yu CY,Wang XM,et al. The risk of mosquito-borne infections diseases importing to China and its prevention and control strategy[J]. Port Health Control,2015,20(1):5-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5777.2015.01.002.
[3] 高强,曹晖,周毅彬,等. 成蚊密度与蚊幼孳生状况的相关性研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2014,20(4):323-325,328. Gao Q,Cao H,Zhou YB,et al. Correlation analysis between adult mosquito density and larvae breeding conditions[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2014,20(4):323-325,328.
[4] 吴海霞,刘小波,刘起勇. 我国病媒生物防控现状及面临的问题[J]. 首都公共卫生,2018,12(1):4-6. DOI:10.16760/j.cnki.sdggws.2018.01.002. Wu HX,Liu XB,Liu QY. Current status and problem of vector prevention and control in China[J]. Capital J Public Health,2018,12(1):4-6. DOI:10.16760/j.cnki.sdggws.2018.01. 002.
[5] 刘起勇. 病媒生物监测预警研究进展[J]. 疾病监测,2018,33(2):123-128. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2018.02.005. Liu QY. Research progress on the vector surveillance and early-warning[J]. Dis Surveill,2018,33(2):123-128. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2018.02.005.
[6] 刘起勇. 我国病媒生物监测与控制现状分析及展望[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2015,26(2):109-113,126. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.02.001. Liu QY. State-of-art analysis and perspectives on vector surveillance and control in China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2015,26(2):109-113,126. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692. 2015.02.001.
[7] Tangena JAA,Thammavong P,Hiscox A,et al. The human-baited double net trap:an alternative to human landing catches for collecting outdoor biting mosquitoes in Lao PDR[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(9):e0138735. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0138735.
[8] 韦凌娅,孔庆鑫,王慧敏. 双层叠帐法与BG-trap诱捕器法在登革热应急蚊媒监测中的捕蚊效果比较[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2019,30(1):65-68. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280. 2019.01.014. Wei LY,Kong QX,Wang HM. Effectiveness of double mosquito net and BG-trap for emergency vector surveillance during dengue fever epidemics:a comparative study[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2019,30(1):65-68. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003. 8280.2019.01.014.
[9] 秦芝旭,杜慧,吴凡,等. 伊蚊的监测与防治[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2017,23(6):575-580. Qin ZX,Du H,Wu F,et al. Surveillance and control of Aedes[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2017,23(6):575-580.
[10] 中国疾病预防控制中心. 登革热媒介伊蚊监测指南中国疾病预防控制中心关于印发登革热防治技术指南的通知(中疾控传防发[2014]360号),附件3[Z]. 北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2014. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for surveillance of Aedes mosquitoes in dengue,notice of the Chinese center for disease control and prevention on printing and distributing technical guidelines for dengue fever (national institute for communicable disease control and prevention Chinese center for disease control and prevention,[2014]No.360[Z]. Beijing:Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,2014.
[11] 郭玉红,吴海霞,刘小波,等. 2018年全国媒介蚊虫监测报告[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2019,30(2):128-133. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.02.003. Guo YH,Wu HX,Liu XB,et al. National vectors surveillance report on mosquitoes in China,2018[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2019,30(2):128-133. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003. 8280.2019.02.003.
[12] 茌静,古文媚,陈戊申,等. 3种媒介伊蚊监测方法在登革热疫点中的应用及相关性研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2015,26(5):495-497,508. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692. 2015.05.016. Chi J,Gu WM,Chen WS,et al. Study on the correlation of three monitoring methods and application in epidemic area of dengue fever[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2015,26(5):495-497,508. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.05.016.
[13] 冯笑,申同洋,刘国涛,等. 3种方法对白纹伊蚊的监测结果分析[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(5):472-474. Feng X,Shen TY,Liu GT,et al. Aedes albopictus monitoring with three different methods[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2018,24(5):472-474.
[14] 林立丰,段金花,李荣彪,等. 现场比较诱蚊诱卵器与传统幼虫监测效果的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2006,17(6):454-457. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2006.06.007. Lin LF,Duan JH,Li RB,et al. Comparative study of the monitoring results of the mosq-ovitrap method and the traditional larval index surveys in the field[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2006,17(6):454-457. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2006. 06.007.
[15] 刘华,曲建强,王学军,等. 2种监测方法在登革热媒介监测中的应用效果评价[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(3):243-246. Liu H,Qu JQ,Wang XJ,et al. Evaluation of the application effect of two monitoring methods in dengue media monitoring[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2018,24(3):243-246.
Outlines

/