Investigation

Comparative study on mosquito trapping efficacy between two mosquito trapping lamps

Expand
  • 1 Qingdao Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao 266033, Shandong Province, China;
    2 Qingdao Institute of Preventive Medicine

Received date: 2019-04-14

  Online published: 2019-10-20

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of mosquito trapping between CO2 and light trapping lamps and to provide a basis for effective mosquito surveillance. Methods From August to October, 2018, different habitats in Qingdao were randomly selected, CO2 and light trapping lamps were simultaneously used for mosquito surveillance, and captured adult mosquitoes were collected and classified. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the mosquito density, and the χ2 test was used to compare the proportion of mosquito species. Results Both trapping lamps were able to trap mosquitoes, and the mosquito density determined by CO2 trapping lamp (25.00/lamp·night) was significantly higher than that determined by light trapping lamp (4.50/lamp·night) (Z=-2.915, P=0.004). The proportions of mosquitoes and female mosquitoes captured by CO2 trapping lamp (94.90% and 99.68%) were significantly higher than the proportions of those captured by light trapping lamp (11.94% and 77.27%) (χ2=2 268.789, P=0.000; χ2=315.951, P=0.000), and the mosquito species compositions captured by the two mosquito trapping lamps were significantly different (χ2=18.903, P=0.000). Conclusion Both CO2 and light trapping lamps can be used for mosquito surveillance, and researchers can choose one or more surveillance tools according to the study objective to comprehensively analyze and survey the density, population, and seasonal variation of adult mosquitoes.

Cite this article

LI Bing-hui, MA Xiao-fang, WANG Wei, SONG Fu-cheng, XUE Jian-jie, JIANG Hong-rong . Comparative study on mosquito trapping efficacy between two mosquito trapping lamps[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2019 , 30(5) : 564 -566 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.05.020

References

[1] 孙洪清,肖宏,陈良. 重视蚊媒传染病[J]. 医学研究杂志,2016,45(9):1-3. DOI:10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2016. 09.001.
[2] 王亚丽,王煊,任瑞琦,等. 中国2013-2016年境外输入传染病的流行病学特征[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2017,38(11):1499-1503.
[3] 黄健华,冯孟贤,王康琳,等. 我国出国劳务人员境外发生传染病状况的研究进展[J]. 中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2015,38(6):445-448. DOI:10.16408/j.1004-9770.2015.06.018.
[4] 郭小连,杨中华. 我国流行性乙型脑炎传播媒介的研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2019,30(1):106-110. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.01.026.
[5] 王永亮,钱成,左锋. 中国内陆口岸登革热流行势态及风险评述[J]. 口岸卫生控制,2018,23(5):17-22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5777.2018.05.004.
[6] 黄秋婵,李莲娜. 登革热流行期间本地居民对登革热的认知水平及相关信息需求分析[J]. 中国临床研究,2017,30(8):1120-1122. DOI:10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2017.08.036.
[7] 龚震宇,龚训良. 2015年全球疟疾防控概况[J]. 疾病监测,2016,31(2):174-176. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2016. 02.020.
[8] 陆宝麟. 中国重要医学动物鉴定手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,1982:66-86.
[9] 艾丽云,侯娟,陈恩富. 传染病重要传播媒介伊蚊控制技术研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(5):508-511. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.05.028.
[10] 汪圣强,杨蒙蒙,朱国鼎,等. "一带一路"倡议下输入性蚊媒传染病的防控[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志,2018,30(1):9-13. DOI:10.16250/j.32.1374.2017208.
[11] 邓海平,徐友祥,王韶华. 紫外线灯诱法与CO2灯诱法捕蚊效果的比较[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2016,22(6):539-541.
[12] 任彤,刘艳华,王艺凯,等. CO2灯诱法与紫外灯诱法捕蚊效果比较[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2011,22(3):260-261.
[13] 帅淑芬,李奕基,陈晓光. 常用蚊媒监测方法概述[J]. 热带医学杂志,2013,13(10):1292-1296.
[14] 王学军,赵志刚,刘峰,等. 两种蚊虫密度监测方法实验室及现场诱蚊效果观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2011,22(6):590-591,594.
[15] 吴晓英,李玉,冯演东,等. 茂名市诱蚊灯法与人工小时法捕蚊效果的比较[J]. 中国热带医学,2015,15(1):41-44. DOI:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2015.01.015.
[16] 蔡恩茂,殷为申,王国强,等. CO2诱捕法与紫外线灯诱法在成蚊监测中的比较研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2012,18(1):11-13.
Outlines

/