Original Reports

Methods for diagnosis of anthrax in outbreaks: application and recommendations

Expand
  • 1 Inner Mongolia Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huhhot 010031, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China;
    2 Inner Mongolia Agricultural University;
    3 State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
    4 Tongliao Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Received date: 2019-04-20

  Online published: 2019-10-20

Supported by

Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (No. 2018MS08058), Science and Technology Project in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2018 and the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2018ZX10101002-001-009)

Abstract

Objective To analyze and summarize the experiences and problems in diagnosis of anthrax in outbreaks, and to provide a basis for anthrax prevention and control. Methods Lesion exudates were collected from suspected anthrax patients using slides and sterile cotton swabs and venous blood samples were also collected from suspected cases. Smear microscopy, direct culture, and broth enrichment were used to isolate and culture Bacillus anthracis. Real-time PCR was used to amplify the genes such as pagA in the virulence plasmid, rpoB in the chromosome, and cap in the capsule plasmid. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect double serum anthrax antibodies. Results A total of 17 specimens were collected in the laboratory of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Tongliao, Inner Mongolia, China, in August 2018. The time window between disease outbreak and sample collection was 1 day at least and 16 days at most, with a mean of 6 days. In the 17 suspected patients, 15 (88.24%) received antibiotic treatment before sample collection. Bacillus anthracis was isolated from 1 specimen, yielding a positive rate of 5.88% (1/17). The real-time PCR analysis of all the specimens gave a positive rate of 41.18% (7/17). The results of ELISA showed a positive rate of 83.33% (10/12) for the protective antibody. Conclusion The optimal time to collect samples is the key to the early identification of outbreak. Real-time PCR, which is a fast and sensitive approach for diagnosis, is recommended for application in anthrax outbreak. Double serum specimens should be collected from all the suspected patients to increase the diagnosis rate.

Cite this article

HAI Yan, WANG Wen-rui, FAN Meng-guang, YUE Hua, SONG Jian, ZHANG En-min, ZHANG Hui-juan, WEI Jian-chun, NIE Li . Methods for diagnosis of anthrax in outbreaks: application and recommendations[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2019 , 30(5) : 494 -497 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2019.05.003

References

[1] 郭卫东,海岩,王文瑞,等. 内蒙古兴安盟发生在2011年的一起炭疽爆发疫情分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学杂志,2014,33(5):554-556. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4255.2014.05.023.
[2] 海岩,跃华,王文瑞,等. 2009-2013年内蒙古炭疽流行病学特征分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2015,42(14):2500-2501,2507.
[3] 梁旭东. 现代炭疽研究进展[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1996:28-31.
[4] 薛采芳,汪美先,黎梅兰,等. 酶联免疫吸附试验检测炭疽病人血清抗毒性抗体的研究[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,1986,2(1):15-18.
[5] 中华人民共和国卫生部. WS283-2008炭疽诊断标准[S]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1-5.
[6] Qi Y,Patra G,Liang XD,et al. Utilization of the rpoB gene as a specific chromosomal marker for Real-time PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2001,67(8):3720-3727. DOI:10.1128/AEM.67.8.3720-3727.2001.
[7] 魏建春,海荣,张志凯,等. PCR方法快速检测炭疽芽孢杆菌[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2002,13(2):105-106. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2002.02.007.
[8] Okinaka R,Cloud K,Hampton O,et al. Sequence,assembly and analysis of pX01 and pX02[J]. J Appl Microbiol,1999,87(2):261-262. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00883.x.
[9] 刘东立,马国柱,贺莉,等. 炭疽暴发疫情病原应急检测方法的应用与分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2016,43(19):3593-3596,3600.
[10] 李伟. 从俄罗斯炭疽疫情谈我国炭疽防控措施[J]. 疾病监测,2017,32(3):179-183. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2017.03. 003.
Outlines

/