Objective To establish a risk assessment indicator system for cross-border imported dengue fever in Yunnan province, and to provide scientific evidence and reference for the prevention and control of cross border transmission of dengue fever. Methods Qualitative and quantitative research combining the first literature retrieval research, group discussion and expert consultation tentatively set the original indicator system framework, and then through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Delphi method constructed the risk assessment indicator and its weight. Results The positive coefficient of the 2-round of expert consultation was 100%; the average expert authority indices were 0.836 1±0.074 3、0.861 1±0.055 7; the mean coefficient of variation was 0.297 3±0.169 7, 0.158 6±0.052 3; expert opinion coordination coefficient was 0.678 (χ2=573.694, P<0.05) and 0.691 (χ2=577.390, P<0.05). After two rounds of expert consultation, the risk assessment indicator system for imported dengue fever in the border areas of Yunnan province was established, including 4 of first level indicators, 10 of two level indicators and 41 of three level indicators. Conclusion Preliminary establishment of the risk assessment indicator system for cross-border imported dengue fever in the border areas of Yunnan. The indicator system provides a reference for carrying out risk assessment of dengue transmission, and provided a scientific basis for the prevention and control of dengue fever in border areas.
HUANG Tian, JIANG Li, LI Qiong-fen, ZHENG Er-da, ZHENG Yan, HE Ji-bo
. Risk assessment indicator system for cross-border imported dengue fever in Yunnan border area[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2018
, 29(6)
: 594
-597
.
DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.06.010
[1] 徐天和. 中国医学统计百科全书-统计管理与健康统计分册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:36-44.
[2] Cancela J,Fico G,Arredondo Waldmeyer MT. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to understand the most important factors to design and evaluate a telehealth system for Parkinson's disease[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2015,15 Suppl 3:S7. DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-15-S3-S7.
[3] Li X,Liu T,Lin LF,et al. Application of the analytic hierarchy approach to the risk assessment of Zika virus disease transmission in Guangdong province,China[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2017,17:65. DOI:10.1186/s12879-016-2170-2.
[4] Mohr O,Hermes J,Schink SB,et al. Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport:a Delphi consensus approach[J]. BMJ Open,2013,3(10):e002939. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002939.
[5] 余向华,胡蔡松,魏晶娇,等. 浙江省温州市登革热公共卫生风险评估[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2016,27(5):491-493. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.05.018.
[6] Kikuti M,Cunha GM,Paploski IAD,et al. Spatial distribution of dengue in a brazilian urban slum setting:role of socioeconomic gradient in disease risk[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2015,9(7):e0003937. DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003937.
[7] Gardner L,Sarkar S. A global airport-based risk model for the spread of dengue infection via the air transport network[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(8):e72129. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0072129.
[8] 廖如燕,陈胤瑜,毛琛. 构建输入性登革热风险预警量化指标体系的研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志,2009,13(3):337-341.
[9] 吴烽,钟玉清,陈胤瑜. 登革热传入性风险评估指标体系的研究[J]. 现代预防医学,2006,33(10):1964-1966. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-8507.2006.10.097.
[10] Wijayanti SPM,Sunaryo S,Suprihatin S,et al. Dengue in java,indonesia:relevance of mosquito indices as risk predictors[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2016,10(4):e0004683. DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004683.
[11] 李美青. 伊蚊诱捕器效果指标和传统登革热监测指标之间的相关关系研究[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2013. DOI:10.7666/d.Y2405731.
[12] 张令要. 登革热媒介监测方法研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2010,21(6):631-634.
[13] Louis VR,Phalkey R,Horstick O,et al. Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping-a systematic review[J]. Int J Health Geogr,2014,13:50. DOI:10.1186/1476-072X-13-50.
[14] 沈纪川. 媒介和气象因素对广州登革热流行的影响及其预测模型的建立[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2015. DOI:10.7666/d.Y2910627.
[15] 王金娜,陆烨,郭颂,等. 气象因素影响登革热传播研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2014,25(6):594-596. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2014.06.033.
