Objective To investigate the effects of ciprofloxacin on the antioxidases activities of Musca domestica larvae and pupae. Methods T-SOD, CAT, and POD activities were detected and analyzed every day. The housefly larvae being fed with 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5% ciprofloxacin, named 0.l% ciprofloxacin group, 0.3% ciprofloxacin group and 0.5% ciprofloxacin group, respectively. Fly larvae fed with normal feed named control group. The detection kits of T-SOD, CAT, and POD were used to detect the enzymatic activity of different groups. The assay on enzymes enzymatic activity of different samples was repeated five times. The statistical methods was used for multiple comparison. Results The enzymatic activities of T-SOD, CAT, and POD were had no significant differences among control groups, 0.1% and 0.3% ciprofloxacin groups. But the enzymatic activities of T-SOD, CAT, and POD at 0.5% ciprofloxacin group were significantly higher than the other three groups. After being fed with 0.5% ciprofloxacin, the T-SOD activity of larvae and pupae were up to 30 and 40 times higher than the control groups, respectively. The activity of CAT in 0.5% ciprofloxacin group of larvae and pupae were up to 3 and 6 times higher than the control groups. In 0.5% ciprofloxacin group, the POD activity of larvae and pupae were up to 2 and 7 times higher than the control groups, respectively. Conclusion Low concentrations of ciprofloxacin had no significant impact on the antioxidase activities of housefly larvae and pupae, high concentration of ciprofloxacin did activate the antioxidase activity.
SONG Nuan, HUANG Zhen-dong, XUE Zhi-jing, WAN Qing, ZHUANG Gui-fen, ZHANG Rui-ling, XU Yong-yu, ZHANG Zhong
. Impact of ciprofloxacin on the antioxidases activities of Musca domestica larvae and pupae[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2018
, 29(5)
: 448
-452
.
DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.05.007
[1] Crotti E,Balloi A,Hamdi C,et al. Microbial symbionts:a resource for the management of insect-related problems[J]. Microb Biotechnol,2012,5(3):307-317. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00312.x.
[2] Engel P,Moran NA. The gut microbiota of insects-diversity in structure and function[J]. FEMS Microbiol Rev,2013,37(5):699-735. DOI:10.1111/1574-6976.12025.
[3] Shi WB,Syrenne R,Sun JZ,et al. Molecular approaches to study the insect gut symbiotic microbiota at the ‘omics’ age[J]. Insect Sci,2010,17(3):199-219. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-7917. 2010.01340.x.
[4] 相辉,黄勇平. 肠道微生物与昆虫的共生关系[J]. 昆虫知识,2008,45(5):687-693. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2008. 05.003.
[5] 刘婧,陈丹,庄桂芬,等. 家蝇发育过程中肠道可培养共生细菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2017,35(2):120-124.
[6] 陈勃生,鲁兴萌,邵勇奇. 鳞翅目昆虫肠道微生物的多样性及其与宿主的相互作用[J]. 昆虫学报,2017,60(6):710-722. DOI:10.16380/j.kcxb.2017.06.011.
[7] 陈丹,张瑞玲,刘婧,等. 蝇类携带病原体研究进展[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志,2016,11(8):765-768. DOI:10.13350/j.cjpb. 160821.
[8] 陈丹. 不同生境家蝇体表携带细菌的多样性研究及家蝇携菌能力评估[D]. 泰安:泰山医学院,2016.
[9] 薛志静,张瑞玲,庄桂芬,等. 家蝇携带真菌的研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2017,28(4):396-399. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.04.025.
[10] 王慧. 重金属Cu2+、Cd2+胁迫对几种蝇类抗氧化酶系统的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[11] 宋暖. 去除肠道共生细菌对家蝇发育和丽蝇蛹集金小蜂寄生作用的影响[D]. 济南:山东农业大学,2014.
[12] Livingstone DR. Contaminant-stimulated reactive oxygen species production and oxidative damage in aquatic organisms[J]. Mar Pollut Bull,2001,42(8):656-666. DOI:10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00060-1.
[13] Lopez-Martinez G,Elnitsky MA,Benoit JB,et al. High resistance to oxidative damage in the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica,and developmentally linked expression of genes encoding superoxide dismutase,catalase and heat shock proteins[J]. Insect Biochem Mol Biol,2008,38(8):796-804. DOI:10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.05.006.
[14] Green DR,Reed JC. Mitochondria and apoptosis[J]. Science,1998,281(5381):1309-1311. DOI:10.1126/science.281.5381. 1309.
[15] Felton GW,Summers CB. Antioxidant systems in insects[J]. Arch Insect Biochem,1995,29(2):187-197. DOI:10.1002/arch.940290208.
