Evaluation of nested PCR and real-time PCR in host surveillance of Lyme disease

Expand
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;
    2 Xinjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Received date: 2018-04-09

  Online published: 2018-10-20

Supported by

Supported by the Thirteenth Major Project (No. 2017ZX10303404-006-003) and Pathogen Monitoring Ability Construction Project (No. 131031102000150003)

Abstract

Objective Nested PCR and quantitative real-time PCR were applied to identify the infection of Borrelia burgdorferi in rodents in this study, so that application of these two methods in host surveillance of Lyme disease can be evaluated. Methods The rodents were collected from Guertu, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region during July to September in 2017. The rodents were examined for the presence of B. burgdorferi by nested PCR and real-time PCR. Results In total of 134 rodent samples, the positive rate by nested PCR was 13.43% with 18 positive samples identified, whereas 17 samples were identified positive by qRT-PCR assay and the positive rate was 12.69%. The cycle threshold(Ct) value was 33.49-37.89. There was no significant difference between the two assays (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). All the positives were detected from Spermophilus undulatus. Conclusion The results suggested that both nested PCR and real-time PCR could be used in identifying B. burgdorferi in rodents. Combination of these two assays could increase the positive rate. The results of nested PCR could provide local-predominant genotypes; however bacterial loads can be estimated by qRT-PCR assay.

Cite this article

ZHANG Lin, MIAO Guang-qing, HOU Xue-xia, LI Bo, HAO Qin . Evaluation of nested PCR and real-time PCR in host surveillance of Lyme disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2018 , 29(5) : 425 -427 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.05.001

References

[1] Piesman J. Strategies for reducing the risk of Lyme borreliosis in North America[J]. Int J Med Microbiol,2006,296 Suppl 1:S17-22. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.11.007.
[2] 张哲夫,万康林,张金声,等. 我国莱姆病的流行病学和病原学研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,1997,18(1):8-11.
[3] 万康林,张哲夫,窦桂兰. 中国莱姆病螺旋体主要生物媒介的调查研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,1998,19(5):263-266. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:0254-6450.1998.05.002.
[4] Hao Q,Hou XX,Geng Z,et al. Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in China[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2011,49(2):647-650. DOI:10.1128/JCM.00725-10.
[5] 李博,阿扎提·热合木,王信惠,等. 新疆乌苏古尔图鼠疫自然疫源地监测分析[J]. 疾病预防控制通报,2014,29(6):30-31,34.
[6] Wilske B,Fingerle V,Schulte-Spechtel U. Microbiological and serological diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis[J]. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol,2007,49(1):13-21. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-695X. 2006.00139.x.
[7] 黄海楠,丁壮,何静,等. 吉林林区动物莱姆病螺旋体感染的调查研究[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,2006,22(8):785-788. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2006.08.026.
[8] Cerar T,Ogrinc K,Cimperman J,et al. Validation of cultivation and PCR methods for diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2008,46(10):3375-3379. DOI:10.1128/JCM.00410-08.
[9] 张琳,侯学霞,耿震,等. 巢式PCR与LAMP方法在蜱的莱姆病螺旋体检测中的应用[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,2014,30(12):1192-1195. DOI:10.3969/cjz.j.issn.1002-2694.2014.12.04.
[10] Wang GQ,Liveris D,Brei B,et al. Real-time PCR for simultaneous detection and quantification of Borrelia burgdorferi in field-collected Ixodes scapularis ticks from the Northeastern United States[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2003,69(8):4561-4565. DOI:10.1128/AEM.69.8.4561-4565.2003.
[11] 耿震,侯学霞,张琳,等. 一种莱姆病螺旋体real-time PCR方法的建立及其在鼠标本检测中的应用评价[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,2015,31(9):812-816. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694. 2015.09.006.
[12] Zhang LL,Hou XX,Geng Z,et al. Combination of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay and nested PCR for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in human serum samples[J]. Biomed Environ Sci,2015,28(4):312-315. DOI:10.3967/bes2015.044.
Outlines

/