The research of bacteria carried by Periplaneta americana from different environments by cloning method

Expand
  • 1 Zhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan 528403, Guangdong Province, China;
    2 College of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University;
    3 College of Life Science Sun Yat-sen University

Received date: 2017-04-26

  Online published: 2017-10-20

Supported by

Supported by the National Quality Infrastructure Project(No. 2016YFF0203205)and International Cooperation Project of Guangdong Province(No. 2015A050502009)

Abstract

Objective Bacteria carried inside and outside the body of Periplaneta americana were studied, which were collected from different environment, and the relationship between the bacteria and the living environment of P. americana were analyzed. Methods Periplaneta americana were collected from the port, hospital and residential areas. 16S rRNA V3-V4 was selected as the target gene 4-5 individuals were collected from each area as replicates. Bacteria carried inside and outside the body of P. americana were studied by cloning method. Results Totally 139 genera, 202 species of bacteria from P. americana were obtained, including 22 genera, 44 species pathogenic bacteria, only 11 out of the 202 detected species were the same. In total, 55 genera, 65 species were obtained from the port, of which 16 genera, 21 species were pathogenic, and only 2 same species were detected among the different individual P. americana. Seventy three genera, 86 species were identified from the residential area, of which 13 genera, 19 species were pathogenic, none of the same bacteria were detected among the different individuals. Sixty eight genera, 101 species were obtained from the hospital area, of which 15 genera, 25 species were pathogenic, only 2 same species were detected among the different individuals. Conclusion Few same species of the bacteria were detected from the different individual P. americana from the same area, or the same species from different areas, so it was quite difficult to conclude the relationship between the bacteria carried by cockroach to its living environment, but more pathogenic bacteria and conditional pathogenic bacteria were detected from the P. americana from the port and hospital areas, so the surveillance of the cockroach should be strengthened in these areas.

Key words: Cockroach; Bacterial; Pathogen

Cite this article

SHAN Zhen-ju, QIU De-yi, CHEN Pei, YUE Qiao-yun . The research of bacteria carried by Periplaneta americana from different environments by cloning method[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2017 , 28(5) : 428 -432 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.05.004

References

[1] Heal RE,Nash KB,Williams M. An insecticide-resistant strain of the German cockroach from Corpus Christi,Texas[J]. J Econ Entomol,1953,46(2):385-386.
[2] 何上虹,梁铁麟,王士珍. 蜚蠊抗性测试初报[J]. 昆虫知识, 1986,23(3):127-129.
[3] 张大羽,程家安,陆永华. 杭州市区德国小蠊抗药性及增效的作用[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1997,8(2):114-118.
[4] 曾晓芃,柯海萍,胡建波,等. 北京市区德国小蠊对4种杀虫剂的抗性测定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1998,9(5):344-346.
[5] 黄钢,刘继敏,刘文彦,等. 河北省城市蜚蠊对5种杀虫剂的抗性测定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1999,10(4):285-287.
[6] 陈海婴,柳小青,郭学俭,等. 南昌市城区蟑螂种群及地区分布的调查研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2003,9(3):36-37.
[7] 陶卉英,柳小青,陈海婴,等. 南昌市蜚蠊的种群结构及优势种的防治研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2008,19(6):522-525.
[8] 吕文,晁国刚,皇甫晓中,等. 陕西省不同地区德国小蠊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2015,26(4):391-393.
[9] 张守刚,熊丽林,郑一平,等. 南京市蟑螂危害状况及抗药性分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2014,41(8):1372-1373,1379.
[10] 王学军,赖世宏,赵志刚,等. 山东省德国小蠊对5种杀虫剂的抗药性调查研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2012,18(4):332-335.
[11] 卢慧明. 德国小蠊对杀虫饵剂的抗药性监测方法及行为选择研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2013.
[12] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 26352-2010蜚蠊抗药性检测方法德国小蠊生物测定法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
Outlines

/