Original reports

The relationship between the distribution of small mammals, vectors and plague in different landscapes in Southwest Yunnan

Expand
  • 1 Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Natural Focal Disease, Yunnan Institute of Endemic Disease Control and Prevention, Dali 671000, Yunnan Province, China;
    2 School of Public Health, Dali University

Received date: 2015-10-10

  Online published: 2016-04-20

Supported by

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30960331)

Abstract

Objective To investigate the distribution features and laws of small mammals and ectoparasitic fleas in different landscapes in domestic rat plague foci in Southwest Yunnan and their relationship with plague prevalence. Methods Yunxian, Yongde, Jinggu, Ninger, Menghai and Mengla were sampling area of our research. The systematic investigation on small mammals and their ectoparasitic fleas distributed in different landscape ecosystem were carried out. The characteristics of the spatial distribution of diversity of small mammals and their ectoparasitic fleas were analyzed using community ecological indexes. Results There were 719 small mammals captured, which belonged to 19 species (subspecies), 12 genera, 6 families and 3 orders. Rattus tanezumi (55.77%) were dominant species. A total of 229 fleas were captured, and they were classified into 14 species (subspecies) of 11 genera in 5 families. Xenopsylla cheopis (57.21%) and Ctenophtha lmus lushuiensis (17.03%) were dominated species. Diversity index and evenness index of small mammals and ectoparasitic fleas in different landscapes was, in descending order, forest area> agricultural area> residential area. But the order of dominance index was opposite. Shannon-Wienne's diversity index(H') of small mammals captured in forest area, agricultural area and residential area was 2.28, 1.60 and 0.16 respectively, and that index of ectoparasitic fleas was 1.97, 1.75 and 0.15 respectively. Conclusion Landscape played a dominant role in community structure of host animals and fleas. Forest area helped to keep natural focus in domestic rat plague foci. Residential area was an important environment of plague prevalence. Agricultural area might be an important channel of transmission and prevalence of plague. Agricultural area played a pivotal role in long-term preservation, prevalence and diffusion of domestic rat plague foci.

Cite this article

HUANG Tao-hua, LIU Lin, DU Chun-hong, HONG Mei, LIU Zheng-xiang, GAO Zi-hou . The relationship between the distribution of small mammals, vectors and plague in different landscapes in Southwest Yunnan[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2016 , 27(2) : 112 -116 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2016.02.005

References

[1] 郑宇婷,王剑,曾旭灿,等. 云南省普洱市南部山区小型兽类组成及其分布特征[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2014, 25(6):496-501.
[2] 龚正达,吴厚永,段兴德,等. 云南临沧地区蚤类群落生态学与区系研究[J]. 寄生虫与医学昆虫学报,2000,7(3):160-169.
[3] 赵春花,李保华,周虹羽,等. 2003-2012年云南省景洪市鼠疫监测结果分析[J]. 疾病监测,2014,29(10):810-813.
[4] 张胜勇,郭宪国,龚正达,等. 云南省21县市小兽体表蚤类群落生态及种多度分布[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报,2008,24(6):518-521.
[5] 刘霖,刘正祥,杜春红,等. 2007-2012年云南省居民区鼠疫宿主动物调查及其地理分布[J]. 中华地方病学杂志,2014, 33(5):517-521.
[6] 詹银珠,郭宪国,左小华,等. 云南省部分地区地里纤恙螨分布调查[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2011,32(1):13-16.
[7] 钱迎倩,马克平. 生物多样性研究的原理与方法[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994:141-167.
[8] 徐正会,杨比伦,胡刚. 西双版纳片断山地雨林蚁科昆虫群落研究[J]. 动物学研究,1999,20(4):288-293.
[9] 方喜业,刘起勇,许磊,等. 中国鼠疫自然疫源地分型研究Ⅷ. 鼠疫自然疫源地分型生物学研究基础理念[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2013,34(1):91-97.
[10] 杨春光,赵文红,董兴齐. 云南省家鼠鼠疫流行特征与强度分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2007,18(3):226-229.
[11] Ostfeld RS,Keesing F. The function of biodiversity in the ecology of vector-borne zoonotic diseases[J]. Can J Zool,2000, 78(12):2061-2078.
[12] Guo XG,Gong ZD,Qian TJ,et al. Flea fauna investigation in some foci of human plague in Yunnan,China[J]. Acta Zootaxon Sin,2000,25(3):291-297.
[13] 吴爱国,宋志忠,李天元,等. 滇西4市县居民区小哺乳动物的群落结构[J]. 兽类学报,2003,23(4):332-338.
[14] 吴爱国,李天元,冯建孟,等. 中国滇西家鼠鼠疫宿主及其媒介群落结构差异的流行病学意义[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2008,29(4):346-350.
[15] 彭尔瑞,王穗,郝莉莎,等. 云南耕地与基本农田保护现状分析及对策研究[J]. 资源与产业,2009,11(4):59-63.

Outlines

/