Original reports

Investigation on infrastructure and service ability of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis clinics in Qingdao, China

Expand
  • Supported by the Qingdao Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission(No. 2014-WJZD160)

Received date: 2015-06-10

  Online published: 2015-12-20

Supported by

Supported by the Qingdao Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission(No. 2014-WJZD160)

Abstract

Objective To master the current situation of infrastructure and service ability of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) clinics in Qingdao. Methods All PEP clinics in municipal health institutions were investigated and over four-fifths in district or county-level institutions and more than one fourth in township health centers were randomly sampled. The contents included human resources, area settings, main necessary materials and facilities and service ability. Excel 2007 was used for data entry and Epi Info 6.04 for Chi-square test. Results There were 2 to 39 staff in each PEP clinic with the average of 12.54 of all, and part-timers accounted for 83.73%. The number ratio of doctors to nurses was 1:1.13. Surgeons and general practitioners totally constituted 90.85% of all doctors, nurses having licenses accounted for 93.07%. Of all clinics, 64.00% were within one department or single area, 100% had sterilizing alcohol and iodine tincture, 98.00% had emergency rescue medicine, 90.00% used a cold chain, 74.00% had a weight scale, 84.00% were open for 24 hours a day. All were able to treat the topical wounds and vaccinate, and 50.00% of which administered rabies immunoglobulin. The clinics in municipal health institutions were better than the other ones. Conclusion There were significant differences in infrastructure and service ability among rabies PEP clinics in different-level health institutions in Qingdao. The construction of some clinics in district, county-level and township health institutions should be strengthened.

Cite this article

QIU Bo, JIANG Fa-chun, HAN Ya-lin, LIANG Ji-wei, XIN Hua-lei . Investigation on infrastructure and service ability of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis clinics in Qingdao, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2015 , 26(6) : 597 -599 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.06.015

References

[1] 卫生部. 狂犬病暴露预防处置工作规范(2009)[EB/OL]. (2009-12-17) [2014-05-03]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/ 2009-12/17/content_1489470.htm.
[2] World Health Organization. WHO Expert consultation on rabies
[R]. Geneva:WHO Press,2010:42.
[3] 山东省狂犬病暴露处置门诊设置规范(试行)[EB/OL]. (2007-05-08)[2014-01-26]. http://www.pingdu.gov.cn/html/ 2007-05/09091510520573687.html.
[4] 王传林,张晓威,俞永新,等. 狂犬病疫苗接种程序的依从性 调查及经济成本分析[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫,2010,16(3): 254-257.
[5] Nandi S,Kumar M. Development in immunoprophylaxis against rabies for animals and humans[J]. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol, 2010,2(1):3-21.
[6] 王建英,见明智,王吉玲,等. 绍兴市犬伤门诊规范化建设状 况调查[J]. 中国农村卫生事业管理,2015,35(1):59-62.
[7] 欧志梅,刘毅,尹仲良,等. 成都市主城区狂犬病暴露处置门 诊调查[J]. 预防医学情报杂志,2012,28(10):796-800.
[8] 吕元聪,吴泰才. 影响广西狂犬病发病因素分析及防制对策[J]. 应用预防医学,2010,16(1):16-19.
[9] 邱波,姜法春. 青岛市2008-2012年狂犬病流行特征分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2013,24(6):546-548.
[10] 邱波,梁纪伟,辛化雷,等. 青岛市2009-2013年狂犬病暴露 处置监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2014,25 (6):563-565.

Outlines

/