Study on the efficacy of spinosad Natular G30 against Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus in two types of breeding habitats in Hainan, China

Expand
  • 1 WHO Collaborating Center for Vector Surveillance and Management, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;
    2 Hainan Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
    3 Haikou Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Received date: 2014-01-11

  Online published: 2014-04-20

Abstract

Objective The efficacy of spinosad Natular G30 against Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus was evaluated at different doses with comparing sewage habitat and small body of water with waste plants habitat, so as to provide evidence for mosquito control. Methods Using wild Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus larvae and water in sewage and small body of water in Haikou, Hainan province, the efficacy of Natular G30 at 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/L was tested, percentage reduction was taken as efficacy index. The pH, temperature, total solids, salinity, dissolved oxygen of habitat water were determined at any two points of time during the trial period. Results There were significant differences (P<0.05) between pH and dissolved oxygen in the two habitats, while no differences between temperature, total solids, salinity. The pH and dissolved oxygen of sewage water were (9.62±0.43) and (12.79±3.01) mg/L, and those in small body of water with wasted plants were (8.91±0.39) and (7.77±3.46) mg/L. The residual efficacy of Natular G30 at 10 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2 against Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus in sewage breeding site lasted for 12 days, while 40 mg/m2 and 80 mg/m2 in both habitats was more than 30 days. In two tested habitats, after one day of Natular G30 using, the first and second instar mosquito reduction was nearly 100%, but for the third and forth instar larvae, 100% reduction date was at three to seven days. To our surprise, the reduction of pupae was negative after one day insecticide applied. Conclusion Spinosad has high and long-lasting efficiency against Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus larvae. Its effectiveness is better when applied in the habitats of small body of water with wasted plants than that of sewage. Spinosad has a very higher efficacy to control the first and second instar young larvae than the third and forth instars larvae, but no noticeable effect on pupae. To control Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus, the spinosad rate should be adjusted based on the characteristics of habitat water.

Cite this article

ZHANG Xiaoyue, MENG Fengxia, LIU Qiyong, REN Dongsheng, LIU Xiaobo, LI Guichang, LI Yuansa, WANG Jun, ZHAO Wei, WANG Xiaohua, HE Changhua, WANG Yanbo, ZHONG Wenbing, CAI Fang, OU Tingting, SUN Dingwei, ZENG Linhai, LI Shangan, LI Changqing . Study on the efficacy of spinosad Natular G30 against Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus in two types of breeding habitats in Hainan, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2014 , 25(2) : 105 -108 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2014.02.004

References

[1] 刘慧, 孟凤霞, 鲁玉杰. 蚊虫对拟除虫菊酯的抗药性检测技术研究进展[J]. 寄生虫与医学昆虫学报, 2010, 17(1):55-60.
[2] 吴志凤, 王以燕, 顾宝根. 我国卫生杀虫剂的现状与发展前景[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2011, 32(5):16-19.
[3] 孟凤霞, 靳建超, 陈云, 等. 我国淡色库蚊/致倦库蚊对常用化学杀虫剂的抗药性[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2011, 22(6):517-520, 528.
[4] Vincent L, Salgado, Joel J, et al. Studies on the mode of action of spinosad: the internal effective concentration and the concentration dependence of neural excitation[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry Physiol, 1998, 60(2):103-110.
[5] 吴霞. 多杀菌素:以天然产物开发新农药的范例[J]. 世界农药, 2001, 23(1):24-28.
[6] 王彦华, 王鸣华. 多杀菌素的作用机理及其抗药性的研究进展[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2006, 27(11):12-15.
[7] Gary DT, Robert D, Thomas CS. Spinosad-a case study: an example from a natural products discovery programme[J]. Pest Management Sci, 2000, 56(8):696-702.
[8] Saunders DG, Bret BL. Fate of spinosad in the environment[J]. Down Earth, 1997, 52(1):14-20.
[9] Bahgat IM, El Kady GA, Temerak SA, et al. The natural bio?insecticide spinosad and its toxicity to combat some mosquito species in Ismailia Govcrnorate[J]. Egypt World J Agric Sci, 2007, 3(4):396-400.
[10] Hertlein MB, Mavrotas C, Jousseaume C, et al. A review of spinosad as a natural product for larval mosquito control[J]. J Am Mosq Control Assoc, 2010, 26(1):67-87.
[11] Cisneros J, Goulson D, Derwent LC, et al. Toxic effects of spinosad on predatory insects[J]. Biol Control, 2002, 23(2):156-163.
[12] Vinuela E, Medina MP, Schneider M, et al. Comparison of side?effects of spinosad. tebufenozide and azadirachtin on the predators Chrysoperla carnea and Podisus maculiventris and the parasitoids Opius concolor and Hyposoter didymator under laboratory conditions[J]. Bull Iobciwprs, 2001, 24(4):25-34.
[13] Duchet C, Larroque M, Caquet T, et al. Effects of spinosad and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis on a natural population of Daplmia pulex in field microcosms[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 74(1):70-77.
Outlines

/