Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control >
Survey of rodents in farmlands in Guangdong province, China and comparative study on two sampling methods
Received date: 2013-08-30
Online published: 2013-12-20
Supported by
Supported by the "Eleven-Five" National Science and Technology Support Program(No. 2012BAD19B02), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. S2011010000895), Science and Technology Plan Projects of Guangdong Province(No. 2011B031500001) and the Combination of Research and Production Projects of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education (No. 2012B091100469)
Objective Rodent infestation monitoring is the foundation for rodent management in farmlands. The current study is to evaluate rodent population dynamics in the farmlands in Guangdong province, China, to compare the rodent density indices reflected by different methods, and to provide important baseline data for population management. Methods The rodent trace method and night trapping method were successively used to determine the rodent densities in the sampling areas. Rodent trace method: Two test lines were set along the irrigation channel or ridge, with a distance of more than 50 m in between; 50 mud stations (20 cm×20 cm) were set at a gap of 5 m on each test line. Night trapping method: Three hundred traps were set at night in each month; the distance between two traps was 5 m, and the distance between two test lines was more than 50 m; these traps were placed at night and collected in the morning of the next day. Results In the farmlands in Guangdong, the annual fluctuation in the density of rodent pests presented a bimodal pattern, and there were two peaks (in August and December) and two valleys (in September and February-March) every year. The capture rate, positive rate of rodent traces, and rodent trace index reflected the fluctuation in rodent population well and showed a significant linear positive correlation between each other; the linear regression equations were as follows: capture rate (Y)-positive rate of rodent traces (X): Y=0.115X+1.119; capture rate (Y)-rodent trace index (X): Y=0.333X-1.078; positive rate of rodent traces (Y)-rodent trace index (X): Y=2.766X-16.332. Conclusion Night trapping method and rodent trace method have different advantages in the assessment of rodent populations in Guangdong farmlands and should be selected strategically according to specific circumstances.
YAO Dan-dan, LIANG Wen-li, SUI Jing-jing, LIN Wei-song, FENG Zhi-yong . Survey of rodents in farmlands in Guangdong province, China and comparative study on two sampling methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2013 , 24(6) : 509 -511 . DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2013.06.009
[1] 任领华,李晋红,赵泽文,等. 旅客列车鼠害综合防治技术研究
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2000,11(2):148-149.
[2] 邓可,张利周,李权,等. 云南天池自然保护区兽类资源调查
[J]. 四川动物,2013,32(3):458-463.
[3] 杨再学,金星,郭永旺,等. 高山姬鼠种群数量动态及预测预报模型
[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(13):3545-3552.
[4] 胡雅劼,刘起勇,钱薇萍,等. 汶川地震灾区病媒生物监测分析
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2010,21(1):9-11.
[5] 杨志俊,罗建国,徐素荣. 饵料消耗率检验口岸范围鼠类侵害程度的可行性研究
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2010,21(3):250-251.
[6] 周建伟,花立民,左松涛,等. 高原鼢鼠栖息地的选择
[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(4):647-653.
[7] 胡全林,曹怀峰,邬虎成,等. 应用洞口系数法调查长爪沙鼠数量
[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志,2011,26(6):463.
[8] 张美文,李波,王勇,等. 四川地震灾区灾后一年农村小兽监测报告
[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(19):5253-5263.
[9] 黄钢,韩晓莉,王喜明,等. 河北省不同地区住宅区鼠密度监测结果分析
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2009,20(3):216-218.
[10] 王勇,张美文,李波. 鼠害防治实用技术手册
[M]. 北京:金盾出版社,2003:179-185.
[11] 黄秀清,冯志勇,陈美梨,等. 雌性黄毛鼠繁殖特征研究
[J]. 兽类学报,1994,14(1):73-74.
[12] 黄秀清,冯志勇,颜世祥. 灭鼠后黄毛鼠种群数量回升动态研究
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1999,10(6):401-404.
[13] 赵雪松,杨福余,华国祥. 新型捕鼠夹用于下水道鼠情调查的方法研究
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2006,17(4):336-337.
[14] 付学锋,田彦林,张洪江,等. 对食饵法、鼠夹法监测结果影响因子的初步探讨
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2009,20(6):519-521.
[15] 张北鹰,魏龙江,郝雨来,等. 国境口岸鼠情监测方法探讨
[J]. 中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2005,28(1):39-41.
[16] 李鸿宝,张柳颖. 粉盒法监测鼠密度效果的现场实验
[J]. 上海预防医学,2012,24(6):341-342.
[17] 唐萌,徐峰,吴江北,等. 旅客列车鼠情调查方法
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2006,17(4):294-295.
[18] 王灵岚,洪朝长,陈小彬,等. 4种鼠情调查方法的比较研究
[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1995,6(5):352-355.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |