Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 637-641.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2021.05.026

• Control Experiment • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The luring and trapping effect of three mosquito attractants and carbon dioxide at different flow rates on Aedes albopictus

DENG Hui1, LIU Li-ping1, XU Qi-ai2, LIAN Zhan-min3, DUAN Jin-hua1, CHEN Zong-jing1, LU Rui-peng1, SHEN Xiu-ting1, YIN Wei-xiong1, WU Jun1, LIN Li-feng1   

  1. 1. Institute of Disinfection and Vector Control, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China;
    2. Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Heshan City, Heshan, Guangdong 529000, China;
    3. Guangzhou Ximeng Jiekang Environmental Science and Technology Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510030, China
  • Received:2021-02-26 Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-10-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2020YFC1200100)


邓惠1, 刘礼平1, 许齐爱2, 廉战民3, 段金花1, 陈宗晶1, 芦瑞鹏1, 沈秀婷1, 阴伟雄1, 吴军1, 林立丰1   

  1. 1. 广东省疾病预防控制中心消毒与病媒生物预防控制所, 广东广州 511430;
    2. 广东省鹤山市农业技术推广中心, 广东 鹤山 529000;
    3. 广州市西盟洁康环境科学技术有限公司, 广东广州 510030
  • 通讯作者: 林立丰,
  • 作者简介:邓惠,女,博士,主管技师,主要从事病媒防控研究,
  • 基金资助:

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy of three mosquito attractants (Attractant A, B, and C), carbon dioxide (CO2) at different flow rates and attractant combined with CO2in attracting Aedes albopictus, to screen out the optimal combination, and to provide a scientific basis for the application of chemical pheromone monitor in the field work of Ae. albopictus surveillance. Methods A remote-controlled chemical pheromone mosquito trap monitor was used to perform the trapping test. A total of 200 Ae. albopictus mosquitoes were placed in the simulation room, and the trapping test was conducted for the three mosquito attractants, CO2 at different flow rates, and attractant combined with CO2, and efficacy was observed after 24 hours. The Chi-square test and the logistic regression analysis were used to compare and analyze the efficacy of different attractants and CO2 flow rates in trapping Ae. albopictus. Results CO2 at a flow rate of 80, 150, and 200 ml/min had mean trapping rates of 50.42%, 64.67%, and 74.33%, respectively, and attractant A, B, and C had mean trapping rates of 66.40%, 70.30%, and 53.00%, respectively. Attractant A combined with CO2 at a flow rate of 80, 150, and 200 ml/min had mean trapping rates of 66.67%, 67.33%, and 79.67%, respectively, and attractant B combined with CO2 at a flow rate of 80, 150, and 200 ml/min had mean trapping rates of 70.67%, 78.67%, and 82.33%, respectively. Conclusion In the simulation test, the remote-controlled chemical pheromone mosquito trap monitor with the application of mosquito attractant and CO2 has a marked effect in trapping Ae. albopictus, which is better than the use of attractant or CO2 alone. The surveillance method can be used for field surveillance and control of vector Aedes mosquitoes.

Key words: Aedes albopictus, Mosquito attractant, Carbon dioxide, Trap, Simulation test

摘要: 目的 通过模拟试验测试3种蚊虫引诱剂(诱思达引诱剂A、B、C)、不同流量CO2及其组合诱集白纹伊蚊的效果,筛选出最优的组合,为化学信息素监测仪在媒介伊蚊监测现场的应用提供科学依据。方法 用远程控制化学信息素诱蚊监测仪进行诱集试验,在模拟室投放200只白纹伊蚊,分别进行3种蚊虫引诱剂、不同流量CO2、引诱剂与不同流量CO2组合对媒介伊蚊的诱集试验,24 h后观察结果。采用χ2检验和logistic回归统计方法,比较分析不同引诱剂、不同流量CO2对白纹伊蚊的诱集效果。结果 CO2流量为80、150和200 ml/min的平均诱集率分别为50.42%、64.67%和74.33%,引诱剂A、B、C的平均诱集率分别为66.40%、70.30%和53.00%。引诱剂A与流量为80、150和200 ml/min的CO2组合诱集率分别为66.67%、67.33%和79.67%,引诱剂B与流量为80、150和200 ml/min的CO2组合诱集率分别为70.67%、78.67%和82.33%。结论 在模拟试验中,远程控制化学信息素诱蚊监测仪组合蚊虫引诱剂与CO2,对白纹伊蚊的诱集效果明显,优于单独使用引诱剂或者CO2。该监测方法可用于媒介伊蚊的现场监测与防治。

关键词: 白纹伊蚊, 蚊虫引诱剂, 二氧化碳, 诱捕, 模拟试验

CLC Number: