ISSN 1003-8280 CN 10-1522/R 中国疾病预防控制中心 主办
Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control
• muci • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHI Jian; ZHOU Li-qiang; LIU Wen-yan; et al
Online:
Published:
师鉴1;周立强1;刘文彦1;刘继敏1;崔相林2;曹庆2;孙克岭2
Abstract: Objective:In order to test the repelling efficacy to Aedes albopictus for two kinds of repellents.Methods:Protective time and rate were observed by means of human body's test.Results:The protect time was over 8 hours for repellent smeared on skin,and under 1 hour for repellent hung on body.Conclusion:The repellent smeared on skin was superior to the repellent hung on body in repelling efficacy.
摘要: 目的:试验测定2种驱避剂的驱避效果及可否实际应用。方法:人体试验法测定有效保护时间和有效保护率。结果:皮肤涂抹驱避剂有效保护时间大于8h,固体悬挂式驱避剂有效保护时间小于1h。结论:目前,皮肤涂抹驱避剂比固体悬挂式驱避剂更具实用价值。
关键词: 驱避剂, 有效保护时间, 有效保护率, 白纹伊蚊
SHI Jian; ZHOU Li-qiang; LIU Wen-yan; et al. Comparison Study on the Repelling Efficacy for Two Kinds of Repellents[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control.
师鉴1;周立强1;刘文彦1;刘继敏1;崔相林2;曹庆2;孙克岭2. 两种剂型驱避剂驱避效果比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.bmsw.net.cn/EN/
http://www.bmsw.net.cn/EN/Y2002/V13/I4/277