ISSN 1003-8280 CN 10-1522/R 中国疾病预防控制中心 主办
Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control
• muci • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Ling-lan;et al
Online:
Published:
王灵岚; 洪朝长; 陈小彬; 陈学榕
Abstract: This paper reported the comparative study on four kinds of investigating methods for rodent population density,powdered-spot,bait expending,clip-trap capture as well as cagetrap capture.Correlation and regression analysis were engaged between the data obtained by different methods.There were great difference among different methods for determining the killing efficiency of rodenticide,which would be in verse proportion to the susceptibility of the investigating method.The repercussions of domestic rodents to the long-term traping and the suitability for different investigating methods was also discussed.
摘要: 本文报道应用配对资料设计对4种常用家栖鼠类种群密度调查方法进行比较研究,对4种方法所测得的相对鼠密度指标进行了相关与回归分析。不同鼠情调查方法衡量灭鼠效率有很大差异,测定的灭鼠效率与调查方法的灵敏度成反比。文中还讨论了家鼠对捕鼠器械长期布放的反应,以及不同鼠情调查方法的适用性。
关键词: 家鼠, 种群密度, 调查方法, 灭鼠率
Wang Ling-lan;et al. Comparative Study on Four Investigating Methods for Rodent Density[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control.
王灵岚; 洪朝长; 陈小彬; 陈学榕. 4种鼠情调查方法的比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.bmsw.net.cn/EN/
http://www.bmsw.net.cn/EN/Y1995/V06/I5/352