Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 296-297.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.03.027

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Observation on effect of a new rodenticide box

KANG Li, CAI Ting, PENG Jian-sheng, ZHANG Wei, LI Guo-zhen, HAN Si-qi, TIAN Zhan-feng   

  1. Zhengzhou Railway Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China
  • Received:2017-02-28 Online:2017-06-20 Published:2017-06-20

新型灭鼠盒灭鼠效果观察

康立, 蔡婷, 彭建生, 张伟, 李国珍, 韩思齐, 田占峰   

  1. 郑州铁路疾病预防控制所业务科/消毒科, 河南 郑州 450052
  • 作者简介:康立,男,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事卫生事业管理和社会医学研究,Email:752731784@qq.com

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of new rodenticide boxes and traditional glue boards, and search for new rodent control devices. Methods We put new rodenticide boxes and traditional glue boards in the front and back of 6 pigeon sheds in Xingyang city to compare the effect of two deratization devices. Results The new rodent control boxes and traditional glue boards showed no significant difference(P=0.690)in efficacy. After 10 d experiments, the mouse density was reduced for approximately 5.00%; 30 d later, the mouse density decreased below 1.00%, the deratization rate achieved was greater than 97.00%. Conclusion The new rodent control box is excellent, with advantages of being safe and environmentally friendly, so it can be used as an important technical means to control the rodent populations.

Key words: New rodenticide box, Traditional glue mouse board, Deratization effect, Pigeonry

摘要: 目的 比较新型灭鼠盒与传统粘鼠板的灭鼠效果,以筛选效果较好的灭鼠器械进行鼠害防治。方法 2016年6月26日在河南省荥阳市某鸽厂选取面积相同的6个棚舍,每个鸽棚前后分别放置新型灭鼠盒与传统粘鼠板,观察灭鼠效果。结果 新型灭鼠盒与传统粘鼠板的灭鼠率差异无统计学意义(F=0.168,P=0.690)。两种灭鼠方法连续灭鼠10 d后,鼠密度均下降至5.00%左右;灭鼠30 d后,鼠密度降至1.00%以下,灭鼠率>97.00%。结论 新型灭鼠盒灭鼠效果优良,同时具有安全、不易被污染等优点,可作为控制鼠类种群密度的重要技术手段。

关键词: 新型灭鼠盒, 传统粘鼠板, 灭鼠效果, 鸽棚

CLC Number: