中国媒介生物学及控制杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种剂型驱避剂驱避效果比较研究

师鉴1;周立强1;刘文彦1;刘继敏1;崔相林2;曹庆2;孙克岭2   

  1. 1河北省疾病预防控制中心杀虫科 保定071000;2保定市卫生防疫站
  • 出版日期:2002-08-20 发布日期:2002-08-20

Comparison Study on the Repelling Efficacy for Two Kinds of Repellents

SHI Jian; ZHOU Li-qiang; LIU Wen-yan; et al   

  1. Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Baoding 071000, Chian
  • Online:2002-08-20 Published:2002-08-20

摘要: 目的:试验测定2种驱避剂的驱避效果及可否实际应用。方法:人体试验法测定有效保护时间和有效保护率。结果:皮肤涂抹驱避剂有效保护时间大于8h,固体悬挂式驱避剂有效保护时间小于1h。结论:目前,皮肤涂抹驱避剂比固体悬挂式驱避剂更具实用价值。

关键词: 驱避剂, 有效保护时间, 有效保护率, 白纹伊蚊

Abstract: Objective:In order to test the repelling efficacy to Aedes albopictus for two kinds of repellents.Methods:Protective time and rate were observed by means of human body's test.Results:The protect time was over 8 hours for repellent smeared on skin,and under 1 hour for repellent hung on body.Conclusion:The repellent smeared on skin was superior to the repellent hung on body in repelling efficacy.