中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 172-174.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.02.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

云南省野鼠鼠疫疫区处置中溴敌隆灭鼠效果评价

刘正祥1, 高子厚1, 段兴德1, 梁云1, 张正飞2, 段炳华3, 浦恩念1, 苏超1, 李玉琼1   

  1. 1 云南省地方病防治所医学动物昆虫防制科, 云南省自然疫源性疾病防控重点实验室, 云南 大理 671000;
    2 丽江市疾病预防控制中心, 云南 丽江 674100;
    3 大理白族自治州疾病预防控制中心, 云南 大理 671000
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-25 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2018-04-20
  • 作者简介:刘正祥,男,副主任技师,主要从事鼠疫及病媒生物控制,Email:lzhx522@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81660554);卫生行业科研专项(201202021)

Evaluation on the effect of rodent control by bromadiolone in the plague epidemic area

LIU Zheng-xiang1, GAO Zi-hou1, DUAN Xing-de1, LIANG Yun1, ZHANG Zheng-fei2, DUAN Bing-hua3, PU En-nian1, SU Chao1, LI Yu-qiong1   

  1. 1 Yunnan Institute of Endemic Disease Control and Prevention, Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Natural Focal Disease, Dali 671000, Yunnan Province, China;
    2 Lijiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
    3 Dali Prefecture Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Received:2017-10-25 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-04-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 81660554)and the Special Fund for Health Sector, People's Republic of China(No. 201202021)

摘要: 目的 评价溴敌隆在云南省野鼠鼠疫疫区处置中的灭鼠效果,为鼠类控制及鼠疫防治提供基础数据。方法 2017年4-5月选择云南省丽江市玉龙县、古城区和大理白族自治州剑川县、鹤庆县居民区及耕地两种生境,使用0.5%溴敌隆母液配制0.005%的小麦毒饵,采取"回合式"投药,采用不设对照区的鼠疫流行疫点区和设对照区的非疫点区分别进行灭鼠效果试验。利用Excel 2010和SPSS 18.0软件对调查数据进行统计分析,灭鼠率的比较采用χ2检验。结果 鼠疫流行疫点居民区灭鼠率为77.67%~100%,耕地为88.89%~100%;设对照区的非疫点居民区灭鼠率为88.48%~100%,耕地为85.72%~97.74%。疫点区和非疫点区同一生境不同县(区)及4个县(区)不同生境灭鼠率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.800、0.863,均P > 0.05),两种试验设计方法计算居民区和耕地的灭鼠率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.507、0.050,均P > 0.05)。结论 溴敌隆杀鼠剂对云南省家栖和野栖鼠类仍具有良好的毒杀作用,且适口性较好,在鼠疫疫区处置过程中可有效降低鼠密度,防止鼠疫疫情蔓延。目前仍可用于云南省家、野鼠两型鼠疫疫区及大面积控制鼠害。

关键词: 溴敌隆, 鼠疫疫区, 灭鼠效果, 评价

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of rodent control by bromadiolone in the plague epidemic area, provide basic data for rodent control and plague prevention. Methods In Yulong county, Gucheng district,Jianchuan county and Heqing county residential area and cultivated land in two habitats, 0.005% wheat bait was prepared with 0.5% bromadiolone and applied to project area of the plague epidemic area and non-epidemic area of the control during April to May 2017. Results The killing effect of plague epidemic residential area was 77.67%-100%, cultivated land 88.89%-100%; In control of non-epidemic residential area, killing effect was 88.48%-100%, cultivated 85.72%-97.74%. As to the same habitat in epidemic area and non-epidemic area in different counties, there were no statistical differences in the efficacy of different habitats in 4 counties and cities(χ2=0.800, 0.863, P > 0.05). Two kinds of experimental design methods were used to calculate the effect of residential area and cultivated land, and there was no statistical significance (χ2=1.507, 0.050, P > 0.05). Conclusion In Yunnan provincial residential area and wild animal habitats, bromadiolone still has good effect as poison baits. In the process of plague epidemic disposal, the population density of rats can be effectively reduced, and the spread of plague epidemic can be prevented. It can be utilized in control of commensal and wild rodents to prevent the two types of plague epidemics.

Key words: Bromadiolone, Plague epidemic area, Poison effect, Evaluation

中图分类号: